this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
299 points (95.2% liked)

Games

24488 readers
87 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jyk0L8eLs7jd7es.png

I'm completely speechless. This looks so terrible I thought it was a joke, but apparently Nvidia released these demos to impress people. DLSS 5 runs the entire game through an AI filter, making every character look like it's running through an ultra realistic beauty filter.

The photo above is used as the promo image for the official blog post by the way. It completely ignores artistic intent and makes Grace's face look "sexier" because apparently that's what realism looks like now.

I wouldn't be so baffled if this was some experimental setting they were testing, but they're advertising this as the next gen DLSS. As in, this is their image of what the future of gaming should be. A massive F U to every artist in the industry. Well done, Nvidia.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh look, DF prostituting their audience to make a buck from NVIDIA. Britain, how far you have fallen to behave just like yanks...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Stuff Id expect and maybe even interested in from a small indie open source dev and absolutely glad their being shit on for doing as one the world's richest and scummiest companies for doing

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

To be fair though, this is the kind of AI enhancement that could be an actual enhancement.

Most AI solutions are a race to the bottom strategy. They claim to reduce a little of the quality of the product and also massively reducing cost (where in reality it’s a massive reduction in quality and costs a decent bit).

This is what I imagined the AI revolution would look like 10 years ago, having AI enhance the product on top of the same level of quality as before, not really trying to get rid of the artists and developers.

Having said all that, the faces looked kind of creepy…

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I agree, but also I see the other side. This is actually a neat usage of AI, it's not slop in my book, it's akin to upscaling.

That being said, those limitations are what drove the original artwork. The artists used those limitations to make the styles and characters we now love.

Master chiefs classic armor was just as much designed my the polygon limitations as much as what they imagined could be done

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Romkslrqusz@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This seems like it’s intended as a texture and lighting improver, not an “AI Slopificator”

Among the other screenshots, a lot of them seem to have a marked improvement.

Aspects of that Grace image comparison definitely look bad, but this is a work in progress that we’re getting a glimpse into. I really hope that bimbofication doesn’t make it into the final product.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I wouldn't have called this generative AI, but Jensen did. Great for stills, uncanny valley for motions. People are claiming it generates completely new images, but in this instance it keeps the same geometry and texture and just processes motion and color vectors to create a hyper-rendered version of the characters.

Ignoring the obvious problems of the hardware it requires and supporting the AI bubble feeding monopoly that is NVIDIA, it is interesting technology that doesn't actually seem to act as a medium for IP theft, my beef with what I call AI slop. It might only be practically good for photo mode in games, but it will be interesting to see how it works out. It could kickstart interest in making Let's Play in a more Machinima style.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip -3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Meh, progress on graphical realism basically stalled out in the last 10 years. It was a matter of time before AI became the tech that pushes it to the next level. I personally don’t think it looks terrible. It looks more realistic if anything. If you don’t like this particular case or the beautification filter, that is one thing, but I don’t see it as refuting the use of the technology as a whole.

Edit: yep, I clicked the post and watched the promo clip. I gotta say, it looks great. I think if you’re saying otherwise, you just aren’t being honest. Lemmy has an ax to grind about a lot of weird shit. It’s odd as hell. I could not careless about the downvotes. Doesn’t change my view.

"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." — George Orwell

The Lemmy mob is no different.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›