this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
361 points (98.9% liked)

politics

29165 readers
3044 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In another round of late-night social media posts, Donald Trump attacked the Supreme Court for not overturning his loss in the 2020 presidential election — and tried to pressure the court to rule his way in future election cases.

Flurries of angry social media posts are not unusual for Trump, but this one was particularly alarming for its scope and the criticism it directed against the nation’s highest court, where six out of nine justices are conservatives and three are Trump appointees.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 140 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Why does this site use cookies?

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago

I wondered that, too!

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Says right there... lol

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh it's to help me! No further questions then.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Honestly his being alive might be a net positive at this point. Republicans have now seen how far they can push the base. Once they get a slightly more competent psychopath in place we'll be five shades more fucked than we are already

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I honestly hope he lives until October 2028.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 96 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Flurries of angry social media posts are not unusual for Trump

Anybody who's ever had to deal with someone with fronto-temporal dementia knows the symptoms.

[–] joekar1990@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Can't wait for the Jake Tapper book to come out later on all this.

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I really hope Jake Tapper isn't related to Trump. He's had enough tragedies in his life.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tomiant@piefed.social 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I hate how much he reminds me of my late dad. Except my dad was well read and smart. Ah shit that's not fair. My dad was generally well intentioned. But the narcissistic bullying and emotional volatility and the blaming and the gaslighting tho...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 43 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

There has to be some point where the congress critters decide this guy is just too unhinged to be in power, right?

[–] ryokimball 79 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The fact that this line appears not to be crossed already is the single most damaging aspect for the US

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Exactly. Can you imagine getting in the Obama tan suit days and having an administration try 1/100th of the crap this one is doing? It's amazing how trump has normalized high treason and rampant corruption.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He's just highlighting what was already true. Rich people can do what they like because they control the government and they have class solidarity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] errer@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The line was absolutely crossed a few months into his first term.

[–] Tower@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

Emoluments Clause at 12:01 PM ET on January 20th, 2017.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 39 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

We can excuse the sexual assault (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the racism (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the child rape (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse hating the poor (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the ableism (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the corruption (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the misogyny (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the ineptitude (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse another pointless Middle East war (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse destroying the social fabrics (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the backstabbing on long standing allies (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse dragging the country into economic turmoil (in fact we encourage it)
We can excuse the violations of the Constitution (in fact we encourage it)

  • Republicans
[–] orlyowl@piefed.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago

Needs to be a full page spread in every major newspaper.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

In other words, "Principled Conservatives".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Problem is most of the congress has empowered Trump too much, so if they step out against him, they are going to be equally implicated.

At this point, it is ride or die for them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Traitors gonna treason.

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Surely that point has long passed?

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Literally no, he could start dragging congress people out and shooting them dead in public and the GOP would cover him for it. Say it's too soon to discuss between rounds. Especially if he leaves the GOP for last, at which point the dead are declared RINOs and ignored.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 39 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If they overturned the 2020 election would that make his current term illegal?

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 38 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I think January 6 makes his current term illegal.

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

His knowing collusion with Russian agents makes his first term illegal.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 10 points 2 weeks ago

His 34 felonies makes it illegal.

You'd think but Americans took a poll two years ago and they decided it didn't really matter much to them.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There is literally no mechanism by which that happens.

Practically speaking, the next President has to go through and undo all of this asshole's changes on paper, by signing new EOs and (in some cases) asking Congress for a law to sign. Most of it is administrative, so easy to undo without Congress.

We can't do anything about anyone he pardoned. They stay pardoned. Can't get around that, Constitutionally.

The fun thing about his pardonees is their general tendency to commit more crimes.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The Supreme Court actually DID steal an election.

They stole it from Gore and gave it to another war criminal shitbag W.

In hindsight, it's insane how little the Democrats / Left complained about it... They just went like "Oh, you stole this election? Ok I'll try again in 4 years. Have a good day."

Now compare that with this orange lunatic who's screaming about an election he LOST and tried to steal.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

There was a good bit of complaining (for whatever that was worth) and W's approval rating was in the shitter just like trump's. Along came 9/11 which was definitely just an intelligence failure even though it was the best possible thing that could have happened for Bush.

One of the many forgotten things about November 2000 was that the Supreme Court -- before its final ruling awarding the Presidency to Bush -- issued an injunction stopping the recount in Florida on the grounds that it would call into question the legitimacy of Bush's win.

[–] PetoniousRex@lemmy.zip 30 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

He is a putrid, lice-ridden tuft of anal pubic hair that’s been transplanted atop a grimy, tattered Egyptian mummy, that’s oft mistaken for a dried-up 6 foot tall, spray-tan colored toilet brush.

[–] human@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

Is that Dickinson?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago

If there were any justice, Donny, you'd get impeached in November and put up against a wall with your entire family on Christmas Day.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

It's always projection with this tiny dick chucklefuck pedo. He's trying to sow some chaos so he can call on them to come in clutch when he pulls fuckery during the midterms and take a "you owe me one" approach.

[–] SirMaple__@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A child trapped inside an adult's body.

No wonder conservatives identify with him.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago

Pretty sure it was Trump's body that was inside the child.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Someone said it would be nice to be able to filter news for things Trump actually did than what he's said.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Major aside, but every time I Wikipedia information about the justices, I’m struck by how young some of them look, despite being in their 70s. Wikipedia just uses 20+ year old photos, which I also rediscover every time.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Eventually we'll get his second term declared invalid, and roll back all of his EOs, legislation, etc., including pardons. Those people will be expected to return to prison to serve out their sentences, or they'll be declared fugitives, and an additional 10 years added to their sentence, no matter what the original sentence was.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

And we'll finally figure out cold fusion and faster than light travel and a unified field theory and everyone will get a pony

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 2 weeks ago

I don't want a pony. I wouldn't mind a small dog or sweet kitty.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] entropiclyclaude@lemmy.wtf 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

That would require Dems to do something.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Eventually we'll get his second term declared invalid, and roll back all of his EOs, legislation, etc., including pardons.

Let me fix that for you:

Eventually he'll get his second term declared invalid, and use that as his reason for running for his third term.

load more comments
view more: next ›