this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
644 points (99.7% liked)

World News

55154 readers
3161 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

UK and Japan among countries that are considering options but yet to commit warships to blockaded shipping route

Countries including the UK, Japan, China and South Korea have said they are still considering their options but without making commitments after the US president, Donald Trump, urged them to send warships to the strait of Hormuz to secure the vital shipping route.

The effective closure of the strait of Hormuz by Tehran, in retaliation for airstrikes by the US and Israel, has proved catastrophic for global energy and trade flows, causing the largest oil supply disruption in history and soaring global oil prices.

However, the international response to Trump’s call for the dispatch of warships has so far proved vague and reluctant, with countries unwilling to commit to a military response that could prove treacherous for their navies.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 15 points 2 weeks ago

I thought it was "already won" and he didn't need anybody else's help?

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

The strategy has been to turn allies against us in every way possible. Gee I wonder why they're not clamoring to risk life and limb for trump now. And lol, his first instinct is to threaten them to get their help.

He simply cannot fathom how to handle a situation where he doesn't hold all the cards. He was born rich and through his entire life he's only had any success because of combining that unearned wealth with psychopathy. He holds no cards right now.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Wtf would China, of all countries, join us? That's just fucking stupid.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

UK, Japan, China and South Korea

Hum... A month ago UK was preparing for a war against the US with the rest of NATO.

And China?! Really?!

Japan barely has a navy, I'm not sure South Korea even has ships on theirs.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

Mission accomplished! We won the war!…Now everyone help me out with this war! 🫲🍊🫱

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In Plane interview last night, Trump threatened NATO members to join the war. "We will remember their inaction/US has a long memory" after a year of threats and extortion against all allies. There is no known offer to allies to "be paid" to help. Meanwhile, Israel has authorized, for first time in history, to pay for its own weapons. Trump's threats come with declaring it a victory if oil prices increase for allies, because US oil companies getting richer is "good for America".

Despite "ahead of schedule on plan" claims, this is all obvious defeat. Every other country in the world is much better off getting Iran's permission to cross without military escorts. They need to extort and threaten the US to get them to declare victory and lift sanctions on Iran. Just buy Iran's uranium, and STFU. US would need to pay more to allies for their help than they'd pay Iran to save face.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The US has a demonstrated very SHORT memory. Who came through for them after 9/11 by landing US bound flights, then fed and sheltered those stranded folks and finally sent their troops to die in Afghanistan?

Only to be ridiculed, tariffed and threatened now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Moron calls for aid. Crickets

[–] chosensilence@pawb.social 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

yeah no fucking shit lol. why would anyone comply? it's only a matter of time before some iranians 9/11 us and our allies are not itching to prevent something we 100% started at their expense.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

if there is a 9/11 style attack, I would bet good money that it would be a false flag from the US. they have many many many instances of false flag attacks in the past.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

I’m a tyrant, why won’t anyone play with me.

[–] stumu415@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe FIFA can step in with the 'straight out of Hormuz' award. Also does anyone seriously think that China will assist the US after the way they have been and still are being treated?

[–] joan@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Lol what a child

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago

He'd get more help if he resigned.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›