this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
644 points (99.7% liked)

World News

55154 readers
2671 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

UK and Japan among countries that are considering options but yet to commit warships to blockaded shipping route

Countries including the UK, Japan, China and South Korea have said they are still considering their options but without making commitments after the US president, Donald Trump, urged them to send warships to the strait of Hormuz to secure the vital shipping route.

The effective closure of the strait of Hormuz by Tehran, in retaliation for airstrikes by the US and Israel, has proved catastrophic for global energy and trade flows, causing the largest oil supply disruption in history and soaring global oil prices.

However, the international response to Trump’s call for the dispatch of warships has so far proved vague and reluctant, with countries unwilling to commit to a military response that could prove treacherous for their navies.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 216 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

This seems to suggest that shitting on our allies, behaving erratically, and stabbing them in the back (and front) isn't the best way to build a broad coalition devoted to mutual interests, to say nothing of a narrow coalition devoted to obvious imperialism. I look forward to learning more about this hypothesis in The Art of the Deal 2.

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 73 points 2 weeks ago

Also suggests Trump floated the idea with the press before discussion in detail with, you know, the actual people who would be sending the boats

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 42 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Everyone is heavily incentivized to watch Trump sweat a bit more.

I imagine there are very few leaders who wouldn't be happy to see Trump replaced.

Why would we come to his aid to mitigate this catastrophic unforced error.

The US has fucked everyone. I've literally been angry about it for a decade now.

The dildo of consequence rarely arrives lubed.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] null@lemmy.org 20 points 2 weeks ago

Even Bush had a coalition of the willing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Paragone@piefed.social 65 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

NO country should side with Trump unless Trump is open to negotiated-ceasefire/settlement.

Otherwise, they're just backing baldfaced imperialism.

& the minute that Trump decides that negotiated isn't on the table anymore?

Withdraw support.

Principles are what no political-gov't can have the spine to have, though.

_ /\ _

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 79 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I have to respectfully disagree. There is no such thing as "negotiation" with Trump and his admin. Serial bad faith actors with no checks and balances from courts or congress. They have no rule of law. It's a tin pot dictatorship where no deals are ever honoured.

It is pointless to engage at any level. They act and react, everyone else acts and reacts. That's it. When Trump is dead, the same rules apply because the courts and congress are still populated with the same people that enabled him.

We can save a lot of time and money and just eject US embassies worldwide for at least the next 20 years. US Diplomacy is dead.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

NO country should side with Trump. Doesn’t need to be more reason.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 59 points 2 weeks ago (21 children)

This is really stupid, just from a strategic point of view, let alone from a moral or political perspective. Sending ships into the Strait just puts those ships in the line of fire...so, why would anyone actually agree to send ships there?

Iran has the "high ground" here. There is no way for ships to take back control of the Strait this way. All the US is doing, is asking allies to take losses for no reason.

[–] Teknikal@anarchist.nexus 30 points 2 weeks ago

My opinion is he knows ships will be sunk so he wants it to be someone else's ships. Let's not forget Iran has a ton of mini submarines probably sitting quietly waiting.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Or… he’s asking them to take losses because he doesn’t consider them allies. World conquest would be easier with the Chinese and UK navies out of the way.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 22 points 2 weeks ago

The fact he included China is the funniest part. Chinese ships are already passing through the strait with Iran's blessing, why the fuck would they ever help lmfao

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 57 points 2 weeks ago (21 children)

As it should. NATO is a defense alliance, not a pedoking/kingbibi distraction gone bad. I hope the EU can keep holding on, because the influx into far right parties and EU election tampering has become noticeable enough to possibly change this in the future.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why isn't the Orange ShitGoblin using the 'Board of Peace' to sort this trifling issue out?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 52 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Good. Fuck the US, Israel and Trump. And fuck anyone and everyone that supports this pedophilic nazi piece of shit.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The United States needs a regime change

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And a system change to boot. This is a symptom.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 44 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Were we not in a trade war with everyone all year? Why would they help us? Should have got the details worked out before starting shit if you were going to need help you stupid orange fuck.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He is just looking for someone to be left holding the bag that he has already filled with shit.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Israel.

Israel is the perfect scapegoat on this, all trump has to do is pull his ships back and stop being a defense for Israel.

That's literally what the American Christian right has always wanted with their support of Israel too.

Their doomsday prophecy is:

  1. Jewish ethnostate in Israel

  2. War in the Middle East, started by Israel

  3. Israel getting wiped off the map which causes the rapture

  4. Nonbelivers have to experience Armageddon

Which was cool with Israel up to step 2, but we just passed that a few weeks ago...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] West_of_West@piefed.social 39 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Damn, wasn't it like 5 days ago he said he didn't need the Royal Navy?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Foni@piefed.zip 39 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If he had consulted his allies BEFORE starting this mess, he would now receive more than indifference and contempt.

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 weeks ago

He pooped on his allies so they’ve turned their backs on him.

[–] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 38 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

Never has it been more obvious how important it is to get fossil fuels out and invest in solar, wind and nuclear power.

I hope everyone else leaves the U.S. and every petro state with their garbage oil and go their own way by investing in green energy, E.V.s and mass transit.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] ccunix@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago

I thought he didn't need any help with the war he had already won?

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Iran has already offered all countries the out of kicking out the US and Israel embassadors so that their ships are allowed to pass the Straight.

Further, my impression is that at least in Europe and especially after the Greenland affair, most of the public opinion thinks Trump is an untrustworthy liar AND because they attacked Iran unprovoked, America and Israel are the ones to blame for the increase in fuel and gas prices they're already feeling.

(There's enough independent press in most of Europe that the "blame Iran" messaging is far from dominant)

The idea of sending European ships into Trump's war is incredibly unpopular and whilst I don't think we're quite yet at the stage were kicking out the American embassador would be popular, the more fuel and gas prices go up the more acceptable it looks.

Then the whole Epstein files thing throws suspicion in people's minds on any European politician that's a little too eager to do what America or Israel wants.

At the very least the offer from Iran introduces doubt and confusion making it far harder for blackmailed European politicians to find a way to justify the incredibly unpopular idea of putting European ships and military at risk because of a war of pure aggression started by America and Israel.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works 36 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The US has the largest military navy in the world, by far. They can very well choose to "escort ships" on their own, if they're ready to accept the risks that comes with it.

The US is essentially looking for a sucker to stick his neck out for them. The British would be smart to keep out of this one, but again, they're British.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

American here.

Our asshole government started this fucking war and is fully responsible for the consequences. Other countries should embargo us until we agree to pay reparations to cover the economic damage caused by the war. Or better yet - seize any assets of American oligarchs to cover damages.

It sounds like I'm ignoring the human cost of the war, and that's because the human cost isn't a concern for those behind Trump. The billionaire class running this country doesn't care about how many innocent people suffer, so they need to be attacked economically.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] asg101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The world should say "Drop the tariffs and we will talk"

Then say "No".

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tirateimas@lemmy.pt 34 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

After mistreating all of his allies, after humiliating Ukrainians in the Oval Office, and after saying he already won this thing multiple times, he keeps requesting others to take risks for him.

Other countries should wait for his navy to get there first before risking their ships and people.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 weeks ago

Remember the Greenland thing?

Europe remembers!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago

Once again, the USA being the only NATO member to ask 'allies' for help, only to later call all of them freeloaders.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Why should any sane country even respond? This is an American-Israeli undertaking. They started it out of folly, they deal with it.

Maybe he should ask his "Board of Peace" for support. There are more than enough bootlickers.

Or the ships should simply follow the law of the seas: the country responsible for the ships' security in such cases is the one they are sailing under. Let's see how Panama, Nigeria, Philippines (or whatever is the cheapest flag of fancy at the moment) run to help.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Redacted@piefed.ca 27 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

He's spent the last year alienating all of the United States' allies and in some cases, directly threatening their sovereignty. So of course nobody wants to get involved in his mess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daannii@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago

Not completely muted. Spain and italy made it very clear how they felt.

[–] maxxadrenaline@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So we’re out of nato but we expect nato to help? Eat a brick trump

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago

There's a very simple solution to it. The US fucks off. They've made things a lot worse for themselves and everyone else as it is, so pull out now and we'll all try figure out how to clean this mess up over the next year or two.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

"CLEAN my MESS! CLEAN my MESS!"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 24 points 2 weeks ago

So far, the US has not sent its own navy ships to escort tankers through the strait.

Then why would other countries send ships to help in a war that the United States of Israel started without consulting them??? Trump, again, shitting himself and expecting others to clean him.

[–] Jaybird@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

Calling us is lovely, but what exactly would you like us to do?

We warned you that they would close the strait and that the world would be powerless. Now you went and did it anyway.

So.. Exactly WHAT would you like us to do?

There are mines in that narrow gap now. We need to clear them while Iran is taking potshots at us. Clearing mines takes weeks. Even when NOT being shot at.

No Trump. You break it, you own it.

[–] JMorningstar@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I thought he had already won the war? Why does he need help again? We wouldn't be any help any way. We wouldn't be anywhere near the front lines according to him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AmazingSUPERG@thelemmy.club 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This looks like a job for the Board of Peace!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 19 points 2 weeks ago

Trump’s attitude towards the entire world has been nothing but arrogant disrespect. He deserves the same in return.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 19 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Apparently it’s illegal for US ships to escort foreign vessels. Seems hard to believe but if it is the case then Trump is really begging.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Apparently it’s illegal for US ships to escort foreign vessels.

And now the Trump regime suddenly cares what is and isn't legal!?!?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mghackerlady@leminal.space 17 points 2 weeks ago

Japan isn't considering it. "We'll think of it" is japanese for "No, but saying no directly is rude"

load more comments
view more: next ›