this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
714 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

19700 readers
2338 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] redbr64@lemmy.world 175 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I always thought it looked cooler with the orange tank anyway

[–] neuromorph@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Cooler with white, but heavier.

[–] guy@piefed.social 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Cooler depends on the amount of sunlight available

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 102 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Orange makes it go faster. Not the fastest color but it's up there.

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 59 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 164 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Back when NASA was flinging things into space for the first time, the tolerances that were even possible were extremely tight. Every pound mattered (every pound still matters, but because we have other things to do once we get to space nowadays, plus every pound is expensive).

600 pounds of white paint for the fuel tank was considered unnecessary, once the engineering team figured that it didn't actually protect the special foam covering of the fuel tank anyway. Thus the distinctive orange color!

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 99 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (10 children)

For all the people in the world except the ones from Liberia, Myanmar and the United States, 600 freedom units = ~272 kg

[–] wieson@feddit.org 23 points 2 weeks ago

Thank you, finally something sensible

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 14 points 2 weeks ago

That's 4 and half men. Or a minivan's worth of kids. Or 100 buckets of KFC

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Dicska@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Tsss, it's barely 1/6th of a skateboarding rhino.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] slampisko@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago

Oh, I thought the pictures were backwards. The orange being the natural color and the white being paint is really critical information for it to make sense lol

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 32 points 2 weeks ago

Oh my eyes glossed over the word "paint". Thanks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 48 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

High end bicycle equipment has weight specs in grams.

[–] excral@feddit.org 51 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

It's always hillarious to me to see boomers on expensive bikes that aim to save every gram while they could save 20kg on themselves.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Perhaps that's why they are on a bike?

[–] RaisinCrazyFool@kopitalk.net 5 points 2 weeks ago

If the point is to burn calories, then shaving weight off your equipment is counterproductive.

But if it makes you want to ride more, then great!

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 weeks ago

Or skinny dudes with enormous ballsacks wearing tight Spandex on 15 pound carbon fiber bikes, but a 20 pound motorcycle lock.

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

If you are trying to lose weight, you should be using the worst, heaviest bike possible.

[–] SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org 19 points 2 weeks ago

Well, not if you still want to have some fun while doing so.

But I agree, that a regular bike should suffice and you don't need to worry about optimizing gear weight if you're not competing for anything and just ride it for your own well-being.

[–] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Well, not necessarily. A bike that's got a full carbon frame also absorbs shock and vibration from the road better. This means you can ride longer distances without getting fatigued in places like your wrists or ass. Longer rides = more exercise.

But once you have a carbon frame, chasing grams on other components gets to be a bit silly.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

In the cycling community we call those guys Freds.

And it's more of a light ribbing than a condemnation, since at least they've got themselves on a bike.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 7 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

But, why ? You drink a bit more water that day and it’s void.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

But what if you drank more water and you didn't have the weight savings?

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's a competition between brand. They're at the point where decrease a single gram is incredible task and are all racing to become the lightest weight and aero-est bicycle and get to claim that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm too dumb for maths because I have dyscalculia, but i am always amazed by the engineering crowd on how they could improve efficiency by finding and tweaking just the little things.

[–] neuromorph@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Its simple rocket math. Every lb of weight must consume fuel.

Si.pky. 1 lb of weight needs 1 lb of fuel to escape orbit. But the fuel has weight also. So the effective fuel you need to lift the rocket and payload is exponential.

The harder stuff is orbital mechanics. Getting things into orbit is easy. Having thwm go where you want is the hard part.

[–] Town@lemmy.zip 27 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
  • Artemis tanks were 10m wide and 30m tall.
  • Cylinder surface Area = (2.pi.r^2^) * (2.pi.r.h) ^[curved area plus top and bottom circles]
    • 2 * pi * 5 * 30 ~ 1100m^2^ to paint
  • Paint paints about 10m^2^ per Litre paint
  • Need 1100 / 10 = 110 Litres of paint
  • 1L of paint weighs about 2kg
  • 110 Litres of paint weighs about 220kg
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Fun fact: Columbia, pictured with the white tank, was the heaviest shuttle and was not modified to have the airlock necessary to dock with the ISS because the performance losses compared to the other shuttles made it difficult to use for ISS operations.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] saturn57@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The real question is why the default color is orange and not white or gray.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 54 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The polyurethane spray foam insulation is orange.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's the default skin. It costs 100,000 doubloons to unlock the sick neon green and black skin.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

SIX HUNDRED EL BEES? HOLY FUCK THAT'S A LOTTA PAINT.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's why American Airlines had the "cheat line" livery. Bare hulls saved them enough weight to carry like an extra 2 passengers.

Plus, polished metal on airframes looks sweet IMHO. Real "DC3 golden era of aviation" vibes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Remove all the tanks and shit on the bottom to really save weight and just let the shuttle fly? It's not rocket science.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Found the Kerbal Space Program player?

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

If it's just the shuttle, the odds of the wrong part disconnecting when you hit spacebar go way down.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Lower the inertial mass." -- Miles O'Brien, Star Trek Deep Space Nine, Season 1, Episode 1.

[–] AffineConnection@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Lower the inertial mass

—what to say when you want your obese Trekkie friend to take care of their health

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Though isn't that decreasing the aerodynamics and increasing the friction?

[–] Atropos@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Probably, but the slowest part of the trip is in the most dense air. Probably still a net benefit!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›