But does the software still work?
this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
200 points (91.0% liked)
Opensource
5851 readers
267 users here now
A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!
⠀
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 24 comments
sorted by:
hot
top
controversial
new
old
> entire product loudly denigrated because of new tool used
Yeah can't imagine why they'd remove the 'come have an argument at me' label.
I want the bubble to burst so this moral panic will end. Programs can code, now. That's not going away. Make your peace. We can either leverage this new ability to describe code into existence, and improve all the ways where it demonstrably works okay - or we can pretend that wasn't the goal of compilers and high-level languages the whole time.
Oh but this new thing is different; yeah it's always different, that's what new means. Neural networks sounded great for decades but had a hard time existing. We finally accepted the bitter lesson that power scales better than cleverness - and hey presto, 'what's the next symbol?' is as smart as a junior developer.
If you think these fumbling efforts are the best this tool will ever be, we can still extract useful work from it. It's already a punchline in videos that build some crazy thing the hard way, then have an LLM effortlessly switch languages for speed. Or fight integration hell on their behalf. We're not doing anyone favors by pretending the problem is the tech. Or by harassing people who work for free on things you like.
You know, as much as I dislike the way llms and other models have been made and used by capitalists, I agree with you that the moral panic around it has turned into a form of slop itself.
It isn't like people haven't been dreaming of what the technology could be for decades. And it isn't like it wasn't inevitable that something would be created like the various generative models. The only part that's bad is the execution. Which is extremely fucking bad, and it's disgusting that it is happening. But that's not the same thing as the underlying concept and technology being bad.
load more comments
(1 replies)
this is some real 2022 style complaint
most developers are using ai in 2026 in some way, it’s simply too good
People malding but its the truth.
You are living under a rock if you think any major software now doesnt have AI written pieces to it in some manner.
Its so common now its a waste of time to label it, you should just assume AI was involved at this point.
Where I work, the company has a ChatGPT contract that's used as a coding assistant tool in VS Code and I imagine also for the admin/contract/legal people doing what they do. Every contracting company developer I've worked with, their company has some enterprise ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini/etc. I've talked to software developers at large companies that raved about what they could do with enterprise Claude and enterprise Cisco AI coding tools
Pretty much everyone I know at the minimum uses the Gemini Google search summary for coding questions/dockerfile/kubernetes/open shift/docker compose/helm/terraform/ansible/bash script/python script/snippets/...
edit: Ineffective activist hive mind people here don't like hearing people using AI. The first person I knew that made regular use of ChatGPT before I ever opened the webpage was an electrician. Like 2 years ago. He used it to write up his emails to customers. The second I met was a person that did marketing for a local restaurant chain. They used ChatGPT to draft marketing text for emails and mailers. Been doing that for like 2 years now as well
I remember in the news Level 5 using generative AI to create early idea. Beloved video games Expedition 33 and Arc Raiders use/used generative AI
2024 article
2025 article
If you're fighting against AI usage in development of anything, strategies of the last few years need to be revisited to determine where improvements can be had
I appreciate your comment, even when many others downvote it. Honest experiences like this provide context and should always be upvoted in my eyes.
You didn't even make any claims about effectiveness or usefulness. Downvotes like these make me sad and make me feel like this is an unwelcoming community in general, where you can't have open and honest discussions.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(7 replies)