this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
559 points (95.6% liked)

Fuck AI

6568 readers
2032 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lutris maintainer use AI generated code for some time now. The maintainer also removed the co-authorship of Claude, so no one knows which code was generated by AI.

Anyway, I was suspecting that this "issue" might come up so I've removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what's generated and what is not.

sauce 1

sauce 2

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 11 points 3 weeks ago

Otter slop?

Damn, I really liked having the same app for my games & same type of settings UI for all (eg switch monitors off & TV on for this game etc).

I don't wanna support AI tho.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Tangent: crediting Claude with co-authorship? wtf?

I can totally see the mega-techs trying to push that in EULAs, but for an individual to do it seems strange, even though there's a kernel of honesty behind it. It also seems risky as far as OpenMetaMicroogleAI finding future loopholes to steal your shit.

This dev talks like they are doing everything else the right way, as far as reviewing and understanding the code regardless of its source. In that situation I'd look at blocks of LLM-generated code the same way as ones copy/pasted from stackoverflow or 3rd party example code. At BEST you have "here's something that might work" which is nowhere close to actually being done if you're any good. (insert joke about "it compiles, ship it!)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I hope the developers respond to this.
Maybe i might just use the Steam Client lol.

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 7 points 3 weeks ago

If AIgen cannot be copyrighted, can it be covered under open source licenses?

[–] neclimdul@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I could never get lutris to even install its flagship games with explicit "support“ and had better luck following online documentation or wine directly.

So I guess I'm saying, that makes sense. No big loss other than it would be nice I'd there was the tool lutris purported to be to help new Linux converts that had the ideals and quality the Linux community strives for.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

I agree with "it's facebook's fault for laying off" etc.

But I also believe they alone wouldn't use it responsibly. Eliza effect would cloud their judgement and cause problems at some point, no?

Hell it already makes them not recognize the moral problems with funding data warehouses.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] crypt0cler1c 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Lutris was always trash

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›