this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Data Hoarder

221 readers
1 users here now

We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time (tm) ). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] damocles_paw@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

When progress forces you to change technologies, you can't always win. But I guess you still have to try.

[–] Provia100F@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Understandable, flash memory is a dead technology that doesn't have any future

[–] zeronic@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Sarcasm aside, this news is absolutely baffling unless they're merely trying to dump the sandisk name and then make their own in-house flash instead for a "clean slate" to the less technically inclined. Which, given how scummy and deceitful they've been over the years, wouldn't surprise me at all.

Flash is the future. HDDs still have the best $/TB now, but that's absolutely not going to be the case forever unless we start seeing collusion where flash and spinning disks "stay in their lane" so to speak with flash continuing to get useless sequential speed increases at the cost of capacity while HDDs stay the course they always have been.

[–] TaserBalls@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

In related news, WD is looking to aquire an incandescent lightbulb factory.

[–] wickedplayer494@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Their shareholders that were asking for this are dumb as fuck. As much as a merger with Kioxia would've sucked even more, at least it would've appeased that crowd that was calling for a spinoff.

[–] Captain_Starkiller@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is it? I thought flash was going to be the replacement for hdds?

What's going to be the replacement storage technology?

[–] Provia100F@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Code talkers

[–] reercalium2@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Didn't... Didn't it LITERALLY JUST buy a flash memory company???

[–] endo@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

"Literally"? I'm not sure what you mean.

They bought a flash memory company in 2016. Literally vs figuratively? Not sure what you mean.

[–] NXGZ@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

You mean merge with kioxia? In this article it says it was rejected

[–] nothxshadow@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Ah yes buy high sell low.

[–] brianly@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Anyone know about the actual attrition here? When companies get acquired they usually try to force a bunch of people out that are hard to replace. What intellectual property and manufacturing they can take can is also a big factor.

[–] gnartung@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

WDC’s flash is manufactured through a joint venture. Flash-related IP isn’t really at risk of being retained by WDC since it is owned by the JV itself…

[–] DaveR007@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

A recent Synology DSM update changed from showing WD NVMe drives as "WD WD_ " to now show them as "Sandisk WD_ ".