this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
177 points (98.4% liked)

Lord Of The Rings Memes

1497 readers
211 users here now

A comm for Lord Of The Rings Memes!

Rules:

  1. Follow the ToS of Piefed.social

  2. Don't be too rough with each other! We're here to appreciate, and sometimes lightly rib, Tolkien's fantastic creation, and all of its derivative works. Arguments happen, but remember, in the words of Tolkien, that food and cheer and good song are what make a merrier world!

  3. AI content will be removed at moderator discretion. We ultimately want to keep AI content in this comm to a minimum, so while unknowingly sharing an AI meme might not always merit a removal, things like AI videos and the like will generally be removed.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Meanwhile I don't accept any downside lol

"Makes player literally a god, removes one potion from inventory."

Welp, not using that one then....

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Couldn't they have just attracted the ringwraiths to an ambush? I know the witch king is supposed to be unkillable, but there's 8 others...

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Maybe they could have worked with the wraiths to form some sort of wraith financial sectors and eventually join the Middle Earth Union through corporalization.

Neoliberalism to bind them.

[–] RedStamp@piefed.social 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The witch king was absolutely not unkillable, just hard to kill. Eowyn slew him after Merry stabbed him in the leg with a barrow blade. There is no indication that, had Frodo and Sam failed, the witch king would have risen again.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If I recall correctly, it had been prophesied that he could not be killed by a man, which the people in-setting took to mean he couldn't be killed by a person. It's only after he died that people realized it meant he'd be killed by a woman.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 9 points 3 weeks ago

Everybody gangsta till they get stabbed in the face.

[–] RedStamp@piefed.social 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You are correct regarding the implication, but I think it's a bit different than that. The blade Merry uses to stab the witch king was from the barrow downs, and was enchanted to be able to harm the witch king. So it was less "oh duh she's not a man, problem solved" and more "his magic shield is busted, stab him quick!"

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I know all that, I'm saying they would have planned under the assumption they couldn't kill him.

Which answers my initial question, I guess. They never tried to use the ring to lure the ringwraiths into an ambush, because if the witch king takes the ring and gets away, they're done.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I loved giving my players items with obvious drawbacks. I presented the wizard this item (heavily inspired by Crawl: Stone Soup) :

Hat of Pondering

  • Advantage on wisdom, charisma, and intelligence saves
  • Advantage on saves against effects that move you against your will
  • Intelligence, Charisma, and Wisdom increase by 2 to a maximum of 22
  • Disadvantage on dexterity saves
  • Cannot use reactions
  • Speed is reduced by half and cannot be increased
  • Cannot take the dash action

His reactions as he read each line item were pretty great. "Oh? Oh! WOW. Oh. Hm. Hmm."

Of course he used it for several sessions, and of course it almost got him killed.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Put it on when you need to figure something out, take it off when it's fightin' time.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Ah, but implicit from my understanding of D&D standard magic items (and I should have been explicit) is the effects persist so long as it's attuned to you. Good thinking, though.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago

Ah, I wasn't actually familiar with that mechanic. Good way to balance magical items!

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Nah, you need to be wearing the item. Most often require attunement as well (so you can't just stack a ton of magical items on someone, generally you can only attune to three items). So if you take it off, generally the effects go away.

That said, you could easily make the item give you a permanent debuff while attuned and a buff only while wearing it.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Good feedback. The intent is to prevent hot swapping it in combat, so if I used it again I'd probably write something explicit like the benefits require attunement and wearing the hat, and the penalties persist while attuned.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

Could just toss on it that it takes an action to put it on or take it off.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I dunno why, but I have the hunch that this Sean is a real wangrod. I mean he even stole the characters Background from Viggos character!

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I didn't even make the connection until now that the Fellowship had two Seans in it.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

yeah. And in any case I can recommend this video wholeheartedly: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkXMxiAGUWg

Thanks for sharing. That was great!

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

The ring turns Hobbits invisible. Men become something stronger.