this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
904 points (99.0% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

6889 readers
641 users here now

/c/TenForward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. Use spoiler tags in comments, and NSFW checkbox for posts.
This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!theorville@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 80 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

TOS came out at a time when people still talked of Columbus discovering america.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 51 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

TOS came out at a time when Columbus was still being held in high regard. :)

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Quick search suggests that the people of Columbia are still pretty happy with the name.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Meanwhile the people of Ohio's capital aren't

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 28 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I live in NYC and no one is actually pushing to get rid of Columbus Circle.

otoh, Trump has a Building right on Columbus Circle, so maybe we should ask Mamdani to rename it Obama Circle.

[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's the part of the story I can find funny. Columbus made four trips to the New World, set up colonies, and explored. He never set foot on the American mainland but he saw it with his own eyes, sailing up and down the Mexican coast looking for the Singapore Straight, which he obviously never found because it was busy being on the other side of the planet. He went to his deathbed believing he'd visited Asia. It wasn't until Mr. Vespucci made it all the way to Argentina before going "Dudes...there's no fucking way we're in the Philippines. There isn't a landmass thousands of miles long in the Philippines."

And he was right, which is why AMERICA! FUCK YEA!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 46 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

To be fair, it would be a boring show if they didn’t.

Ship enters orbit of a planet

‘Spock, what do our scans show?’

‘Intense geologic activity, no atmosphere, no life signs.’

Ship spends the next 3 months in orbit collecting data, moves on to the next target

‘Spock, what do our scans show?’

‘Planet is frozen, no geologic activity, no life signs.’

Ship spends the next 3 months in orbit collecting data

Realistic sci fi is waaayyy too boring for a general audience.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world 24 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I choose to believe that it's usually like that, and we're just seeing the days where something interesting happens.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 13 points 3 weeks ago

I mean it has to be.

They age and have discussions of things we don't physically see.

Talking about the first encounter of the Q being 3 years ago not 1000 episodes ago

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah, it kinda feels like you could do a very ‘boring’ science series just showing all of that. But I feel like that’s just ‘sci’ with no ‘fi’.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Event_Horizon@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)
[–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I'm glad you made this comment because I was about to.

Starfield, a surprisingly great framework for a game from Bethesda, but they forgot to put the actual game inside it

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

realistic scifi can be fun for general audiences still. they just have to focus on the right bits.

look at the early seasons of for all mankind. it's about the realistic process of achieving space flight goals. it spends 60% of its runtime on how the launch even comes to happen. then it shows the bits that go wrong and the ways they manage fix them and the political/personal drama of the decision making process on all sides.

now, that's a very dry show for people that like science, politics, and history, but the realistic scifi could just as easily be wrapped in a funny show about dumb politicians and crazy rich people. use the same strategies, but make it about the engineers at space x having to work under musk. show them having to suddenly pivot away from lidar for no reason other than musk's ego. show them trying to talk about space flight with a podcast bro. create drama when one of the main character's lives is actually on the line because no one trusts the new valve gasket supplier musk brought in for political clout.

the parts stat trek glosses over are the parts realistic scifi focuses on. like how they decide what planet to go to next. the episode always starts with them already there or randomly being drawn somewhere. or like what actual physics would matter in what they're doing and not "plasma phase inverter coils" needing to be "degaussed of subspace radiation".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 40 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I mean the original line was "where no man has gone before" which at least made sense, although it didn't represent the female crew very well.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 72 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

English uses 'man' and 'mankind' interchangeably.

Grammatically, 'no man' makes more sense than 'no one.'

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world 25 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

I've always thought it was an odd change. I get why they did it, but the original clearly wasn't being used in the way the change implies.

It has the same energy as saying that you can't use the term "whitelist" and must substitute "allowlist", or "master bedroom" to "primary bedroom", or that time they changed "monkeypox" to "m-pox".

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"Master bedroom" being changed is such a silly one. That term wasn't even used until the 20th century and referred to the master of the household. It has nothing to do with slave masters.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It speaks to a larger cultural ignorance or poor literacy to even consider it, in my opinion. I've seen similar reactions to talking about "plantation-style" home architecture. It's as if many people have only ever heard these words in connection with slavery from their lessons in school.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (18 children)

Yeah it’s be hard to argue TOS was excluding women in that sentence given the presence of female bridge crew members.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 18 points 3 weeks ago

"I am no man!" Says the female crew, who proceeds to stab the space Nazgul in the eye.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, it did though. Women, too, are human.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lakemalcom@sh.itjust.works 32 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

It was a list:

  • to explore strange new worlds
  • seek out new life and new civilizations
  • boldly go where no one has gone before
[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

Boldly yes, but It's been a long road gettin' from there to here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] silver_wings_of_morning@feddit.dk 31 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Where no MAN has gone before. Therefore plenty of space chicks

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 19 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Just watched an episode where they literally went to a section of space completely absent of all energy and matter and still somehow met this

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

TBF in the ToS it was ”Where no man has gone before”, not “Where no one has gone before.”

So if it was aliens then the statement was correct, we’d just have to skip all the weird human populated worlds they found.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, it was supposed to be where no 'man' has gone before, but people had to whine about it, and here we are.

[–] kieron115@startrek.website 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm just realizing that the wording change made humans seem REALLY pretentious!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] s@piefed.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The people who were already there didn’t go there if they were always there

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

There wasn't even coffee in the nebula

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

I mean, isn't this basically what every European did in the Americas and Africa?

Columbus: "Look, I'm the first human being ever to set foot here!"

200 Taíno people staring at him wondering WTF was going on

Columbus: "Look, I planted a flag, that way if anyone else ever comes here, they'll know this is Spanish land now."

[–] Cattail@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

There are parts where no one has gone, but landing on a barren rock probably isn't a good story

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

As progressive as the show was for its time, it is informed by narratives of the settler imperialism that helped Europeans "conquer the new world".

There's a reason why the intro casts space as "the final frontier." The frontier myth and its accompanying ideology of Manifest Destiny still formed the widely accepted version of U.S. history. Not the land-grabbing, genociding, slavery-spreading version we know today.

Bonus thought: Exploring space was obviously a big thing back then so it's understandable how Roddenberry came up with this line. But when you really think about it, time is the final frontier that we haven't managed to break through yet. Not space.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

And not just natives (who are invariably human shaped), they often have entire databases of info on them from presumably when they were "discovered".

Mass Effect was a better sci fi universe and I'll die on that hill.

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 weeks ago

I don't even think many people will disagree with that. The appealing thing about Star Trek was always the utopia, the idealism, the philosophical questions, and (in some cases) the sciency details. Most attempts to make Star Trek into some kind of uber-galactic-struggle-between-alien-races or quest-to-avoid-the-destruction-of-the-universe that were the focus of many later sci-fi shows ended up making it worse.

As fully fledged sci-fi universes that were explicitly written with these "big" stories in mind, Mass Effect or The Expanse are clearly ahead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kieron115@startrek.website 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They said no "one". They can go places as long as there are many things there.

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 weeks ago

Just empire things.

[–] ShaunKL@startrek.website 6 points 3 weeks ago

The further we go the more we find ourselves.

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 weeks ago

Look, they are trying.
They just keep getting distracted on the way and where overtaken.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Eh. You don't have to be the first person to discover something to discover it. This is what people always miss with the vapid line about Columbus not discovering the Americas. Sure, there were already people there. But the vast majority of the human population in 1492 was ignorant of the very existence of the American continents. And their discovery instituted an epochal change that upended both the Americas and the old world.

We can condemn genocide and displacement without becoming pedantic gotcha warriors.

If all that matters is the first person to discover something, no scientist in human history has ever discovered anything. After all, relativity was probably first discovered 5 billion years ago by some alien physicist living several galaxies away.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ConstantPain@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You wrote Starfield wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›