I would have loved this option like 10 years ago – when it wasn't clear what a toxic company facebook is.
this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
136 points (95.9% liked)
Technology
73833 readers
5459 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It was pretty clear what a toxic company facebook was 10 years ago. I'd say it was already becoming increasingly clear by the time The Social Network released in 2010.
Would've caught zero traction then lol. You can only do this if you have a very established and dedicated userbase already. Trying this from scratch with little users is a death sentence.
I'd take this over ads any day
Same here, but only if its reasonably priced. Otherweise I probably should stop using it.
In Instagram I only habe one Person I'd Miss from the family. In Facebook it's friends and family from other countries and so many that it's still practical to habe a facebook account. But let's see.
€9.99/month if paying on the Web, €13/month if you want to pay from within the Android or iOS apps. Not worth it IMO, especially since they say nothing about not collecting your data.
E: pricing correction
Those companies are fucking delusional. Not even on it's height would that be worth it to me. Just goes to show how much money they extracted from you via ads before.
Yeah, too much for me.
(I don't think that's it - it's 9.99 if you're paying on desktop and 12.99 with the Apple tax (also applied to Android), but applies to your whole account.)
I see that now, I'll edit. Thanks
Maybe if they hadn't already harvest my data for decades. Now that it's no longer as profitable they want me to pay to just avoid being nagged?
Hopefully the EU makes an example of them for providing an extreme drawback to opting out for users. They know full well that this isn't how data protection is intended.
It's telling that this is omly for GDPR countries. They don't want YOUR money, they want advertisers' and data analysts' money. A subscription isn't as profitable as selling your personal data. How fucked up is that?
Honestly - as much as Facebook is a horrible behemoth, this makes sense to me. How do you pay for the service? By watching ads. Or you pay a subscription.
Someone made this point above, but if that were true this would've been implemented in every country, not just the ones with GDPR.
The relevant reasoning [of how this makes sense in terms of alternative to privacy and regarding GDPR compliance]:
The option for people to purchase a subscription for no ads balances the requirements of European regulators while giving users choice and allowing Meta to continue serving all people in the EU, EEA and Switzerland. In its ruling, the CJEU expressly recognised that a subscription model, like the one we are announcing, is a valid form of consent for an ads funded service.