this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Chicago Bears

2 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Fields and Mahomes are not the same.

[–] Draker-X@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Fields only played well because their defense is shit.

Fields mostly played well (for three quarters) because their defense is shit.

Take away the 70-burger Miami dropped on them, and the Broncos are still allowing 24.5 PPG: almost 3 above average, and good for 23rd between the Raiders and Giants.

They've played two really good defensive games vs. KC this season. Why? I'm sure there are reasons, and we'll hear about some of them.

Fields mostly played well (for three quarters) because their defense is shit, and he's not good enough to be a starting QB in the league.

[–] AfterMany7239@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Fields is un ironically H1M

[–] In-the-bunker@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

I guess you wouldn't trade fields for Mahomes?

[–] Doctor_IanMalcolm@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Division games are typically closer and have more upsets than non-division

[–] 10justaguy@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

The broncos were missing some guys on defense like Justin Simmons.

I thought Justin’s been sacked 115 times cuz of the line and coaches?

Bagent has taken 3 sacks in 2.5 games, one of those against a pass rush that includes both Bosa and Mack.

[–] FunkyCannaHigh@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Just because Bagnet is not a franchise QB doesn't make Fields one! πŸ€£πŸ˜‚