this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
486 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

83500 readers
2970 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Users of Meta's AI smart glasses in Europe may be unknowingly sharing intimate video and sensitive financial information with moderators outside of the bloc, according to a report from Sweden's Svenska Dagbladet released last week. Employees in Kenya doing AI "annotation" told the journalists that they've seen people nude, using the toilet and engaging in sexual activity, along with credit card numbers and other sensitive information.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 140 points 1 month ago (5 children)

lol what kind of weird nerd is wearing smart glasses while having sex lmao

imagine you're over at some dudes house, about to get dicked down, and he comes out with nothing but these big fat blinking glasses on

[–] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 73 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I assume it's people making (hopefully consensual) POV videos.

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 41 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I know why they’re doing it. I just think it’s something only a doofus would do.

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Or someone making OF content for example.

[–] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago

Agreed 👍

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You think only a doofus would make POV sextape with their partner?

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

with these, absolutely

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

Only a doofus would buy these glasses.

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 month ago

I think only a doofus would spend money on smart glasses from facebook

[–] skrlet13@feddit.cl 10 points 1 month ago

Yea, it sounds more confortable than wearing just a camera tied to yourself. POV porn is popular afaik

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I feel like people using these glasses, instead of a good camera setup WHICH CAN COST LESS, which look more incognito, are likely not doing it consensually...

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It doesn't even need to be fancy or expensive

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Believe it or not but not all sex starts with walking into the bahtroom, closing the door, disrobing, and hopping under the covers.

And while it likely applies less to the folk with camera glasses: If your vision is poor enough, it is always a tradeoff between them getting in the way and constantly squinting at your partner.

[–] TALL421@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why do you have blankets in your bathroom

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No it's the "Baht Room". Like you've been Baht. You need to be punished. *wtsh *wtsh

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

Exactly. This obviously wasn't a brain fart + typo.

The kink shaming of some people.

[–] EdgeOfDistraction@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Let me gobble you up like a Türkiye

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

omg can I just make fun of techbros wearing Facebook smart glasses without everyone doing an 18-point analysis on it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I hate making out wearing glasses. That said, it is a porn category 🤷‍♂️

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Glasses are like lingerie: They’re not for during, but before

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Really? I think it's way more natural than wearing a go pro.

Bedroom is a very reasonable realm for smart glasses if they aren't connected to the internet and are used for local recording.

The really weird part is wearing them in public and either recording people without their consent or even giving the clear impression of recording people without their consent. Wearing smart glasses in a public place is just an asshole move.

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

According to recent events, some fucked up people are willing to be filmed like this. Here's link to the video if anyone is interested.

[–] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world 60 points 1 month ago

Reading this headline all I can think is "Are y'all really surprised?"

[–] decapitae@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why um, why do "smart" glasses have moderators? 🤔 Am I too far 'offline' to be asking? 😬

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Am I too far 'offline' to be asking?

This is surveillance phobic... and I'm down for it

[–] decapitae@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It may be time to train some llms to be anti llms... 🤔

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

AI training. They have the tag the videos for model consumption.

[–] decapitae@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

Egads! AI - the new asbestos. They're putting it in everything! B🤦

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So, hypothetical, if I bought these, put a spare laptop in a closed, filled with the worst shock movies from the internet, and set these glasses so that they continuesly watch these videos. Would that be against the EULA?

[–] Rodancoci@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

You'd just be ruining a minimum wage worker's day and possibly traumatizing them. They typically outsource content annotation/moderation so no one important at Meta would be affected.

The better course of action is to continue to ridicule anyone you meet wearing these poorly-disguised surveillance instruments and raise awareness among your peers.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

you're punishing those poor guys that are doing the job for $10/month. zucc doesn't care at all as they are already giving ptsd to thousands of moderators tasked of watching the reported gore videos

[–] recked_wralph@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I know that bandwidth isn’t hardly the finite resource that it used to be, but I still can’t get over how amazingly wasteful it is to continuously stream live video halfway around the world just so you can… ask your glasses to describe what’s in front of you?

[–] MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It must be incredibly useful for blind people, but for everyone else it's a pure wank.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lydon_Feen@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

I mean... If you can't trust underpaid workers in Kenya's sense of privacy, who can you trust?

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Dicking down Riley Reid. Meta style.

Or being dicked down by Johnny Sins.

The glasses have potential. But anything with Zuck I don't trust. (I have to be inclusive here)

[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All Johnny Sins needs is a GoPro and a suction cup.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

I've already seen plenty of POV porn where the guy has two free hands, so I'm sure it's a gopro and head strap. Which I'm sure looks ridiculously goofy for anyone else in the room.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'll say it. It Zucks.

[–] MushuChupacabra@piefed.world 13 points 1 month ago

Nice to know that when you're standing at the urinal, some schmuck at Meta has seen your hog.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't think I could get off if my partner was wearing these hideous things.

Or anyone else in the room for that matter.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

I always make sure to tell my audience to remove any smart glasses. It's just creepy doing it in front of them otherwise.

[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I won't have sex unless my partner is holding one of these

[–] dil@piefed.zip 7 points 1 month ago

Some idiots be sharing nsfw stuff when asked to upload stuff for the ai companies, they have hella warnings telling you that isnt the kind of content they want lol

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

Sex while a corporation has access to your footage sounds like a kink for libertarians

[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Any camera/audio device with a wireless connection in your home is recording and storing your intimate moments.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago
[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Finally, a way to indulge in exhibitionism without having to leave the house!

load more comments
view more: next ›