this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
60 points (90.5% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

16223 readers
24 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Will the current turbulent situation lead to a third world war?

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 4 weeks ago

No.

IMO 2026 is the turn around year for europe/russia already and europe will slowly provide enough stability to the world to prevent WW3.

Lots of stupid wars and conflicts lay ahead though.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 32 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Things are looking pretty fucking bleak, but not in a "Spanish flu in the trenches" kind of way.

The US is turning into fucked up Gilead.

Water shortages are about to be a thing.

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Drove past Glen Canyon dam the other day. Everything in the area has high water due to early snow melt, and yet powell lake and glen canyon are noticeably low. Gonna be bad year for anyone downstream.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 4 weeks ago

It's gonna be a bad entire foreseeable future. The laws governing how much water can be used from the Colorado River were all made during an unusual wet spell that they mistook for normal; it can't actually supply that much. Unless the politicians manage to get their shit together and reduce the allocations, levels are just going to get worse and worse and worse until there's nothing left, even if the weather isn't bad.

[–] EpicFailGuy@lemmy.world 22 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I would argue that we have been in WW3 for a while ... since this whole "de-globalization" started.

World wars are hard to define ... what started WW2? Is there a single moment in time? Was it Pearl Harbor? Was it the invasion of Poland? By the time the Germans Invaded the conditions for world war had already been around for a while.

I'd argue that we're currently in the "appeasement" phase of WW3 ... I just hope that it's a cold and mostly economic war .... and not one with global drafts and attrition (altho Russia and Ukraine already have broken that barrier)

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

“Was it Pearl Harbour?” Tonnes of countries were involved already, it was already WW2 for a while. The blitz of London was started and ended by the time the US was attacked at the very end of 1941. They were plenty happy to let everyone else fight it out and then when they got attacked suddenly they were the altruistic heroes of man.

[–] EpicFailGuy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

our history books (Every country's honestly) are choke full of propaganda. I only noticed because I got formal education from 3 different countries.

I found it very interesting for example ... that Spain does not teach about the inquisition or the spanish american war.

Flip side, in the US there's nothing in our books about any of Europe's history at all.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

US history sounds even worse than our Canadian history classes. Just complete garbage. And then you see what people are learning in other countries and you have to wonder why we act like 10-12 years isn’t enough time to fit in any reasonable amount of our, honestly, very short history.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 22 points 4 weeks ago

Maybe. We won't really know its WW3 until we are very much in it. Terms like first world war and WW2 were used within months of each war starting, but until you know the scale it becomes you can't really be certain where it will escalate to.

[–] graycube@lemmy.world 19 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I think by "WW3" you are really asking, will countries start lobbing nukes at each other? Unlikely, although I wouldn't put it past Trump to try one at least once. Rumors are that he has asked the military to use nukes more than once already and they refused or talked him out of it.

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Just gotta convince that FEMA tRump appointee that hurricanes exist. Then tRump will try to direct its path with a Sharpee marker. When that fails, he'll suggest we nuke the hurricane. That's when we dance!

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Short of China invading Taiwan, this is probably the closest we will get. Multiple world powers fighting each other, proxy wars, etc.

[–] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 weeks ago

China invading Taiwan

which won't happen for so many reasons. honestly, china seems to be the thing holding the global economy together

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago

No. This is one demented pedophile and a criminally indicted zionist radical doing pirouettes and backflips while lining their coffers.

It will further radicalise the Middle East to be sure, but everything they can do from the air is already done.

There is no plan, and bibi probably never thought he would get this far.

Trump can’t afford to keep this going whilst maintaining the rest of global security and keep persuading his other hobbies in Greenland, Venezuela, Mexico and Canada.

Also, the domestic situation inside USA and the Epstein files not going away may soon divert his attention away again. As you’ve probably seen, the dude and his circle is all about market pump and dump for all the insider trading and hit and run military operations so to make his weak ass look big bold and strong. If they were serious about Iran they wouldn’t be doing it like this.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 12 points 4 weeks ago

Iran has been stirring shit for too long for anyone with military credibility to step in on its behalf. It’ll be a regional conflict at most.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 10 points 4 weeks ago

No, Russia and China don't give a shit. Russia is too busy with losing to Ukraine, and China isnt happy with Iran bombing places that actually give China more oil than they do.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 weeks ago
[–] guy@piefed.social 6 points 4 weeks ago

No, this is just Iraq again, but with the victim throwing bombs at everyone close this time

[–] Vinylraupe@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 weeks ago

Probably not because Iran has no atomic bomb.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

No.

While the Trump admin is idiotic, the Iran conflict is just a repeat of the events in the later half of the 20th century.

Russia has exhausted itself trying to obtain some paltry mineral resources.

China is highly aggressive and will continue to expand into neighboring countries like they have already been doing, they're the most likely cause of a widespread global conflict, but judging by their incompetent handling of Venezuela, Cuba, and Iran as well as their rapidly declining population due to irresponsible governing (they executed or exiled most of the social policy experts a century ago and put a missile defense scientist in charge of the bureau that tracks population trends resulting in the One Child Policy) I doubt they will be confident about any longterm wars. Still, they constructed a mostly underground military city near beijing 10x the size of the pentagon, so they're definitely planning something.

Fact of the matter is, for all competent leadership, war is less efficient means to obtain things you want than trade. War has become too expensive in the 21st century. Only idiots wage war.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

Xi understood that 10 years ago, but he's purged or fired everyone near him that would tell him that now.

The US understood that 4 years ago. But then we elected Taco for a second go round.

I'm not saying they will, I'm saying that dictators and fascist assholes don't always do that makes sense.

I forsee America entering a debt crisis and China might see that as an opportunity.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The odds just got higher. If China goes for Taiwan, and the US goes all out to defend them, I'm willing to say thats it, WW 3.

It won't be as cinematic as the second, but that's my line.

[–] mr_anny@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

US would help Taiwan just as much as Russia is helping Iran.

They are tied to elswhere atm.

We all know what happens to countries trying several fronts at once.

War is about logistics, logistics and logistics. Remote wars bring more logistics in play. And they are burning munitions fast in Iran.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

If China invaded now, the US would help Taiwan as much as we are helping Ukraine.

We could defeat China in a few months by blocking the Malacca straight.

Unless Xi cut a deal with Trump.

[–] Sarothazrom@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

No, WW3 won't happen until China goes for Taiwan, and even then that's just another step, dunno if that would explode into a bonafide world war.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 4 weeks ago

We're already at a two front war.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

If China and Russia had come to Iran’s aid then it would be WW3.

But they didn’t so it’s just going to be dusty Vietnam. Again.

[–] DoomGuy_e66@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

From what I've gathered from the comments, I think we're safe so far

Depends. Can the galling regime in Iran motivate a Shiite revolution across the world and can they do gorilla warfare from tunnels in Iran's mountainous regions for a long time. And distrupt the flow of oil sufficiently thus causing the us dollar to collapse and thus the global markets along with it (Rothschild banks USD as international reserve currency etc etc).

The us is distracted so China might take the opportunity to take Taiwan. That will herold in the end of the consumer driven economy enjoyed by the western world cos trade with china drives everything.

When markets and quality of life collapse this bad u either get a populist revolution (eg Hitler, Stalin, etc) or the government starts an economic rejuvenation project (war driven economy).

The economy is essentially just a function of how effective a population is at turning resources into product. Wealth concentration has got so heigh we are approaching the point that people can no longer consume the GDP. Thus u need a product sink else the economy stops. Thankfully the war driven economy already proves an excellent resources sink (war itself). Orwell predicted this yet nobody listened.

We might get to be the ones to witness the death of liberty, but then again the pots boiling so slowly their is little chance we will know when that happens. Who's to say the final blow to liberty hasn't already been dealt and we just can't see it yet.

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world -2 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)
[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 13 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

China = "Asia"

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Hey, maybe whoever created this map just has a really thick London accent. Although that wouldn't explain all the other mistakes.

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

It's cheap-ass AI. Just to put a visual onto the current status. Not meant to be quality.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 13 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Holy ai map, batman. What the shit is that?

[–] Opisek@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 weeks ago

At least New Zealand is on it I guess?

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 weeks ago

Don't forget to add Cuba, Greenland, and Canada that Trump has threatened to take over.