this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
6 points (63.6% liked)

Apple

20377 readers
3 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Never thought I'd see the day that an iPad can be used like a Mac, and a Mac can be used like a MacBook.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] franzbroetchen@feddit.org 11 points 1 month ago

Touch screen MacBook Pro rumors are exciting

No, they aren't

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] ytsedude@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You know it's going to be insufficient!

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

If it’s less than 16gb, then they will have totally changed direction on AI.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 2 points 1 month ago

article doesn't state

[–] IllNess 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

However, one key feature that apparently won’t make the leap to the Mac is Face ID, despite it being a vital part of the iPhone’s Dynamic Island. Gurman’s report makes no mention of Face ID, and it looks like Mac users will have to stick to Touch ID for the time being – especially considering Gurman previously claimed that Face ID on the Mac is “years away” from being realized.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

I like Touch ID better. I wish iPhones still had Touch ID.

Well, that will have taken long enough.

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No clickbait titles please

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I just used the title of the article, as suggested by lemmy. A lot of communities require the article title to be used. I will keep that in mind in future for this sub