this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
909 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

83251 readers
4338 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 238 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Who'd have thought that warrant-less mass surveillance that treats every citizen like a potential criminal would eventually hit a tipping point where people began to fight back against it?

[–] SpezCanLigmaBalls@lemmy.world 84 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Along with it incorrectly labeling people as a criminal so cops harass innocent families

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 89 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That's a feature, not a bug.

The whole point of warrantless mass surveillance where you collect a person's entire life history from birth to death is to be able to go back through that history at any point they become an inconvenient person, whether because they are protesting or are a whistleblower or anything else that endangers the existing power structures. They can and will use your history to fabricate a "reasonable" narrative to turn you into whatever type of criminal they claim you are.

This is exactly why they're pushing the "antifa is an organized terrorist organization" so hard.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

And they wonder why people have anxiety disorders

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 month ago (4 children)

"You'd have anxiety too if you knew that entire government organizations were dedicated to watching your every move while everyone told you that you were crazy."

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I watched a video last night. Some guy was banned from a casino. All they had was a blurry surveillance camera photo of him.

The AI tagged some other guy as him. Cops came and arrested him. Said the man's ID must be fake, or he used a fake ID last time because there's no way their high-fallutin AI could be wrong! It was >99% certain!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What’s funny is someone at flock is likely seeing this as a business opportunity. “With flock+ we will detect downed cameras and send a technician out to replace them instantly. Subscribe now!”

Meanwhile, municipalities are less than thrilled about defending throwing money at something literally no taxpayer wants.

This problem might solve itself really. Let the buisness majors sell the hangman their own nooses.

[–] privatepirate@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Sadly some people do want flock cameras because they think it's worth it to have a better chance of catching criminals even if our personal liberties get taken away. It's the age old freedom vs safety discussion.

[–] Kellenved@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago

Those who sacrifice liberty for safety deserve neither

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe a year or so ago, but now those same people are starting to understand the definition of criminal is flexible.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CatZoomies@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Meanwhile, new age Glassholes Flock to their new Meta glasses.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's because they want to be the ones doing the surveilling. There's loads of disgusting threads you can find online about them discussing ways to disable or hide that their devices are recording so they can surreptitiously record others while claiming they're not. Most often filming vulnerable women.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 128 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There's nothing more American than destroying a Flock camera

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago

I was almost gonna say something about killing nazis, but..

nah, not as american

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 73 points 1 month ago

Stealing them is felony grand theft.

Vandalizing them is a misdemeanor (typically, check your local laws and also don't do crimes).

If they were all stolen, it's an easy PR 'woe is us, think of the children' win for Flock.

If there's a bunch of social media posts that are showing chopped down flock cameras just laying on the side of the road then it has better optics from the point of view of 'We don't want country-wide surveillance networks'.

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 59 points 1 month ago
[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 47 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Couple dead pixels from a particularly bright light might well make them unable to do their plate reading job efficiently. Might make for an interesting study.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lasers tend not to be good for camera sensors, I've heard.

[–] Quexotic 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think you'd need pretty high powered lasers to do sufficient damage. I think a class 3 wouldn't be enough, or so I've heard.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That might actually work, but it's probably easier and safer to just use a can of spray paint

[–] mjr 15 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Paint seems easier to detect and remove.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Paint can be seen by passers by. A fried sensor can’t.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What shall we do with an angle grinder (3x) early in the morning?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago

If we won’t defend our 4th Amendment rights the sold out politicians sure as hell won’t

[–] SpezCanLigmaBalls@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ive thought about getting a stick with a cardboard sign that says fuck flock and putting it right in front of all the cameras around me that i know of

[–] cranakis@reddthat.com 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Been awhile since I checked out this website and only now just found out there is a new one right next to the office I work at.

[–] officermike@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

that i know of

I was quite surprised to see how many there are.

https://deflock.org/map

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I could've sworn 2 weeks ago there was an article about people breaking into them to steal the wires and components.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I hear tell them cameras is full of valuable minerals like gold and copper!

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

ANYTHING cloud-connected - your doorbell, your security system, even all f**king post-2006 vehicles, regardless of manufacturer - are suspect.

And are highly likely to be actually spying on you.

I’ve been working with computers since 1982, on the Internet since 1988, on the Web since 1992, and in the IT industry since 1997. The proportion of average people who don’t realize how much of their stuff is exposing them, and by how much, is frankly astounding. It’s almost 100% of normies who are woefully ignorant. Even IT people who have no clue is in the majority.

And the security on this stuff that tracks you tends to be - except in rare circumstances - absolute dogshite. Sometimes it comes without any security at all, such as all devices sold having admin creds baked in, or all remote-access credentials being identical and non-user-editable.

This is why almost all of my stuff is hardlined, I have no IoT devices at all, and the wifi for my family’s devices is physically separate from everything else.

Don’t get me wrong, as IT for almost three decades I love all the new shinies. But I’m not blind, and I’m not stupid.

[–] Mynameisallen@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago

Much later into the career than you but honestly in the same boat. I don't fucking let any of that shit into my house, I don't use any of the big tech companies software, FOSS on everything I own and I honestly have become so disillusioned with mainline consumer tech because it's honestly mostly trash imo. The older I get the more I realize I just want a fucking laptop with a decent keyboard, decent screen and good battery life.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But but but...the internet told me that Americans welcome this with open arms! /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

It's every American's duty as an American to do so.

[–] omnioki@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

hell yeah they are 🤘

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

Tech crunch indeed.

load more comments
view more: next ›