this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
117 points (92.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

38943 readers
1549 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Everybody knows about the backstory, there was a civil war, KMT fled to Taiwan creating two Chinas sort of, maybe, neither recognises the other, whole thing. ROC (Taiwan) ended up transitioning from military rule to a multi-party democracy, while the PRC (mainland China) didn't do that (they did reform economically, "socialism with Chinese characteristics" and all that, but still a one-party state, not a multi-party democracy). The status quo right now is that Taiwan is in the grey area of statehood where they function pretty much independently but aren't properly recognised, and both sides of the strait are feeling pretty tense right now.

Taiwan's stance on the issue is that they would like to remain politically and economically independent of mainland China, retaining their multi-party democracy, political connections to its allies, economic trade connections, etc. Also, a majority of the people in Taiwan do not support reunification with China.

China's stance on the issue is that Taiwan should be reunified with the mainland at all costs, ideally peacefully, but war is not ruled out. They argue that Taiwan was unfairly separated from the mainland by imperial powers in their "century of humiliation". Strategically, taking Taiwan would be beneficial to China as they would have better control of the sea.

Is it even possible for both sides to agree to a peaceful solution? Personally, I can only see two ways this could go about that has the consent of both parties. One, a reformist leader takes power in the mainland and gives up on Taiwan, and the two exist as separate independent nations. Or two, the mainland gets a super-reformist leader that transitions the mainland to a multi-party democracy, and maybe then reunification could be on the table, with Taiwan keeping an autonomous status given the large cultural difference (similar to Hong Kong or Macau's current status). Both options are, unfortunately, very unlikely to occur in the near future.

A third option (?) would be a pseudo-unification, where Taiwan becomes a recognised country, but there can be free movement of people between the mainland and Taiwan, free trade, that sort of stuff (sort of like the EU? Maybe?). Not sure if the PRC would accept that.

What are your thoughts on a peaceful solution to the crisis that both sides could agree on?

edit: Damn there are crazies in both ends of the arguments. I really don't think giving Taiwan nukes would help solve the problem.

I think the current best solution, looking at the more reasonable and realistic comments, seems to be to maintain the status quo, at least until both sides of the strait are able to come into some sort of agreement (which seems to be worlds away right now given their current very opposing stances on the issue)

(page 3) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 0 points 1 month ago

Or there is the “send a bunch of PRC soldiers to the ROC and let’s see what will happen”

They won’t run out of people for the meat grinder, that’s fò xiù as would sunglasses-man say

[–] ZMoney@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I think it would be a lot easier for China to cooperate peacefully with countries it perceives within its sphere of influence if there wasn't a hostile global military hegemon maintaining a bunch of military bases and naval fleets within striking distance.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] neutronbumblebee@mander.xyz -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not too serious a suggestion, but if migration worked once to escape the PRC why not do it again. Move all your industries offshore to an enclave or possibly several in friendly neighboring countries and then your population. I mean the population isnt so large that it's not technically impossible to relocate. it's not much more than some of the largest world cities. Then when invaded withdraw entirely. Anyone happy to live under Chinese rule can stay. Given climate change humanity is probably going to have to get used to massive migrations anyway. Horrible as that could be culturally being a semi independent part of another democracy would fix their declining population, plus being a massive economic stimulus all round. I suspect something like this may be happening informally anyway. Their main strength is economic and organizational so why not build on that.

[–] xxam925@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Very simple really…

China hasn’t finished their revolution yet. That’s their internal business and absolutely none of mine.

It will end up resolving and I’m pretty sure which side will end up winning but ya never know.

Not sure why anyone thinks they get to have an opinion.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

My maternal grandma was born in the mainland, back when it was still ROC in it's waning days in 1949 just months before the proclaimation of the PRC and CCP took over

is the revolution finished yet? Where the egalitarianism? Why are there zero women out of the 28 members of the politiburo?

Grandma is about to die lol, kind weird how this revolution takes so long... its almost like we never gonna move past this Vanguardism stage...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

Reunify all the islands leading up to Taiwan back with mainland China like they did with Hong Kong, and eventually Taiwan itself. Problem solved.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›