this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
117 points (92.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

38925 readers
1555 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Everybody knows about the backstory, there was a civil war, KMT fled to Taiwan creating two Chinas sort of, maybe, neither recognises the other, whole thing. ROC (Taiwan) ended up transitioning from military rule to a multi-party democracy, while the PRC (mainland China) didn't do that (they did reform economically, "socialism with Chinese characteristics" and all that, but still a one-party state, not a multi-party democracy). The status quo right now is that Taiwan is in the grey area of statehood where they function pretty much independently but aren't properly recognised, and both sides of the strait are feeling pretty tense right now.

Taiwan's stance on the issue is that they would like to remain politically and economically independent of mainland China, retaining their multi-party democracy, political connections to its allies, economic trade connections, etc. Also, a majority of the people in Taiwan do not support reunification with China.

China's stance on the issue is that Taiwan should be reunified with the mainland at all costs, ideally peacefully, but war is not ruled out. They argue that Taiwan was unfairly separated from the mainland by imperial powers in their "century of humiliation". Strategically, taking Taiwan would be beneficial to China as they would have better control of the sea.

Is it even possible for both sides to agree to a peaceful solution? Personally, I can only see two ways this could go about that has the consent of both parties. One, a reformist leader takes power in the mainland and gives up on Taiwan, and the two exist as separate independent nations. Or two, the mainland gets a super-reformist leader that transitions the mainland to a multi-party democracy, and maybe then reunification could be on the table, with Taiwan keeping an autonomous status given the large cultural difference (similar to Hong Kong or Macau's current status). Both options are, unfortunately, very unlikely to occur in the near future.

A third option (?) would be a pseudo-unification, where Taiwan becomes a recognised country, but there can be free movement of people between the mainland and Taiwan, free trade, that sort of stuff (sort of like the EU? Maybe?). Not sure if the PRC would accept that.

What are your thoughts on a peaceful solution to the crisis that both sides could agree on?

edit: Damn there are crazies in both ends of the arguments. I really don't think giving Taiwan nukes would help solve the problem.

I think the current best solution, looking at the more reasonable and realistic comments, seems to be to maintain the status quo, at least until both sides of the strait are able to come into some sort of agreement (which seems to be worlds away right now given their current very opposing stances on the issue)

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago

I don't think it matters what I think. Like everyone else chiming in on this thread, I have zero expertise on the subject - so whatever I say is just my personal preferred outcome, not a realistic one.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Peaceful or fair?

For peaceful, I think that China needs to make it so the world doesn't depend on them for high end chip manufacturer, so the USA stops caring about them because they're not a critical strategic national interest.
Then they just invade.

The world isn't doing shit about Gaza, the world is barely doing anything about Ukraine. I think the world sits by and watches it happen, if they're not a critical strategic interest.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Give the Taiwanese people Alabama and move them there. Then give China an empty island

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Modern day winning the peace is a matter of reaching some mutal benificial agreement between the hegonoimic classes in a society.

The best case imho for them would be PRC democratises to the point the average person in the countries political rights are respected and Taiwan socializes enough that corperate interests dont run to hard counter to the unified states interests.

Equally possibly though is they continue to corparatizing (though trends seemed buck of that) to the point where corperate interest agree and are unimpeded enough to merge regulations of the two countries.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

A third option (?) would be a pseudo-unification, where Taiwan remains as a separate country, but there can be free movement of people between the mainland and Taiwan, free trade, that sort of stuff (sort of like the EU? Maybe?). Not sure if the PRC would accept that.

Theres already free movement from Taiwan to Mainland China IIRC.

The PRC's current take is "Taiwan is an autonomous part of China", the only sticking issue would probably be Taiwan having its own foreign policy as they aren't going to accept having a US military base right off their coast.

Genuinely the best "solution" is reunification at an indeterminate point in the future (maybe next century, maybe the one after that, etc), avoiding anything that could disrupt the status quo.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

mostly a distraction from internal problems, realistic they will never capture taiwan intact, if they want those chip factories, plus its not like hong kong where the govt is chosen by CHINA.

[–] OppaGundamStyle@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

China should be balkanised and people given freedom to live independently without fear of imperialist invasion.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] btsax@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They do like in that Starfleet Academy episode where they fake a war to satisfy everyone's honor and just pretend everything is OK

[–] OriginEnergySux@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

From Australia's POV: China blockades Taiwan (or economically chokes them a different way) and Taiwan gives in. We don't step in coz we want lithium from our China daddy so we can build our own AI data centres.

Social media complains about it until either something distracts us or it lasts over a month and everyone gets over it.

[–] NaibofTabr 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Forty-Six

When the Tao is present in the universe, The horses haul manure.
When the Tao is absent from the universe,
War horses are bred outside the city.

There is no greater sin than desire,
No greater curse than discontent,
No greater misfortune than wanting something for oneself.
Therefore he who knows that enough is enough will always have enough.

Sixty-One
[...]
Therefore if a great country gives way to a smaller country,
It will conquer the smaller country.
And if a small country submits to a great country,
It can conquer the great country.
Therefore those who would conquer must yield,
And those who conquer do so because they yield.

A great nation needs more people,
A small country needs to serve.
Each gets what it wants.
It is fitting for a great nation to yield.

Thirty
[...]
Force is followed by loss of strength.
This is not the way of Tao.
That which goes against the Tao comes to an early end.

from the Tao The Ching (by Lao Tsu), as translated by Gia-Fu Feng and Jane English

Book 14 #3

The Master said: 'When the way prevails in the state, be enterprising in speech and enterprising in action; but when the Way does not prevail in the state, be enterprising in action but prudent in speech.'

from The Analects (of Confucius), as translated by Raymond Dawson

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›