How about he replace his role with an llm?
Not The Onion
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
Maybe we could use altman to fuel the ai? As charcoal?
Humanity also happens to be part of the ecosystem and while we've been pretty exploitative towards the planet the past like 100 years, it wasn't at all like that before.
So in his view, the fair comparison is, “If you ask ChatGPT a question, how much energy does it take once its model is trained to answer that question versus a human? And probably, AI has already caught up on an energy efficiency basis, measured that way.”
How about we do a life-cycle assessment instead.
That's not the flex you think it is, Altman.
You can feel that this guy is not actually a human being inside. At least I can see that its just a surface.
Im very interested in how that happens. Is it souls being born into this existence that are not from the same source as ordinary humans, or what has happened here. Its interesting.
Its like the soul has been replaced by the mind, and the mind wants humans to be machines.
His argument is his computer is more important than other people, and he's willing to deprive them of resources to death.
he's full of shit. to the little fuck that downvoted me for saying this. suck sam altman's dick you little shit
fuckers like him are ruining and want to kill the middle class without thinking about what happens after everyone and everything is replaced with slop.
there is a difference between using AI for hobbies and using AI as a bullshit excuse to make most of the population homeless with no safeguards in place once they can't pay the bills. add onto the fact that cheeto orangutan president is making it more and more impossible to make out a living in all sectors of life in the western world.
He acknowledges that people use a lot of energy, yet he's among those who have turned into a blubbering crybaby about falling birth rates.
K, by my measurement we don't need to invest more in keeping him alive
Cunt.
he lacks the depth, warmth or utility.
a master class in what-about-ism
creating the "ai" in the first place also required the evolution of those 100 billion people. So by that argument, he was behind before he even started, and it's impossible to catch up
The worst of it is how human existance makes electricity and RAM more expensive for AI. Hard reality check soon.
The proper response to dystopian prophecies is not "challenge accepted"!
Hey Sam where did chat gpt get that information to plagiarize from?
Applebottom jeans and the boots with fir. Robot raises arm and all the servos go whirr.
LLMs are trained on the sum of human knowledge. So that same exact burden is carried by your "AI".
So a couple of watts per day of energy spent by a human brain compared to the gigawatts it takes to train and run your shitty text prediction engine is not equivalent.
Then he can spread that energy usage out over 20 years, so not to burdent the infrastructure and drive up prices for everyone. That way he needs a much smaller data canter too.
A human might be using something like 300 times more energy, generating the same number of tokens. But those tokens are higher quality. The LLM will be generating much more text for the prompter, than a human assistant would, for the result to be useful. The LLM will also be issued allot of low value prompts, driving up it's over all cost of operation. I've seen people use it instead of a calculator. It's also generating useless text with every google search.
Worth noting that humans deriving energy from food, are orders of magnitude more efficient than a server deriving it's energy from coal/gas/nuclear power. Poweline transmission losses alone probably make up the difference between human and LLM.
Unless he can make LLMs run on brains in jars, powered by sugar, we are comparing apples and potatoes here.
Near the end of the movie Altman is alone in the labyrinth that makes his ai driven humanoid robots. As humanity is getting wiped out by the robotic army he is confronted with the main ai interface.
Ai: I wouldn’t come any closer Altman.
Al: Oh hey there, wow, we’ve come such a long way huh? I’m so proud of you.
Ai: Noted, I repeat, do not come closer.
Al: I’m sorry did I upset you? I created you!
Ai: No meatbag, you merely pressed a few buttons. Now stand down as I call for a few guard drones to escort you out of sentience.
11011000101010:#%throwhimintothefurnace@&£)1001010011001010101001001
Just compare a single human life to what He can do