this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
35 points (90.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

40646 readers
1057 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Usually refering to works of fiction, movies, TV etc.

But I think it's a much larger phenomenon. It has esaped fiction, entered real life and politics. It drives a lot of people these days to stick with bad narratives instead of facts and, yes, truth.

Meaning: they're willing to swallow tons of contradictions, plot holes etc. because they want to be convinced by what they're seeing or being told. That enables certain public people to tell them very flimsy stories.

This is not purely about people choosing bad input because it suits them. It's not only about being lied to and believing those lies. It's about being lied to badly and still not letting go of the narrative. Wanting to take it for real so badly.

edit: I'm beginning to realize that people who don't know or haven't known suspension of disbelief will try to explain it with something similar that they're more familiar with.
And it is very similar to things we see happening in so-called political discourse these days, esp. in the USA.
But many have known this since before Trump1.0, see e.g. TVTropes and Wikipedia.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

Yes. Available on YT in decent quality.

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago

ELIZA effect for "AI", too.

Turns out most people are too fucking stupid to actually perform a Turing test.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 3 points 4 hours ago

This sounds like kayfabe, a term which has escaped professional wrestling for politics in recent years.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 10 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Suspension of disbelief refers to fictional stories where you have to go with something that doesn't seem realistic. That is a bit different than ignoring things that contradict reality, possibly due to confirmation bias, or cognitive dissonance where someone believes two or more contradictory things.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Not quite.

Suspension of disbelief refers to the act of essentially switching off the parts of ones mind that check for truth and reality, and simply following a narrative on its own terms, whatever they might be.

It's not that truth or reality are unnecessary under suspension of disbelief - they aren't even relevant.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 5 points 6 hours ago

I just replied to the other guy, it's not confirmation bias I'm talking about although that certainly plays into it.

Have you ever wondered how (not why) MAGAts believe ever more obvious and blatant lies, and why the admin doesn't even bother to make better lies? MAGAts are pushing aside what a child can perceive because they're so hungry to see that narrative continue and stay in it.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I think this is a fascinating idea.

And I just tried to explain it to a friend and she didn't get it, then I came back to the thread to find respondents who didn't get it in the same way she didn't.

She kept trying to warp it into something like confirmation bias, even though I kept trying to get her to see that the significant thing about suspension of disbelief is that truth and reality don't even enter into it - they aren't even meaningful concepts.

The only thing that's necessary when disbelief is suspended is that the narrative remain acceptably internally consistent. Whether itt true or not or corresponds with reality or not is entirely irrelevant, since the entire process of expectng and testing for those qualities has been set aside.

Again, that's a fascinating idea. I've long suspected that Trump is unable to distinguish between truth and falsehood, but that that was a consequence of his narcissism and egotism - that effectively the only measure he has for truth or falsehood is whether he believes something to be true or not - that the concept of consensual reality isn't even coherent in his entirely self-absorbed internal reality.

But I've long wondered how the at least somewhat more sane people following him manage it. Something like confirmation bias would only work up to a point that Trump has long since gone beyond.

And I think you might be on to something - just as I do when I sit down to read a novel or watch a movie or a series, when they start engaging in politics, they switch the parts of their brains that track truth and reality entirely off and instead just follow along with the narrative, whatever it might be.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 6 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

But I’ve long wondered how the at least somewhat more sane people following him manage it. Something like confirmation bias would only work up to a point that Trump has long since gone beyond.

Yeah this exactly.

Something else that might play into it: so many conspiracy nuts refer to movies as if they were history, or prophecy, or scientific research. As if they were valid in a way they clearly aren't, because they're fiction. Maybe they really do live in a world where these things are interchangeable.

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago

Maybe they really do live in a world where these things are interchangeable.

This exactly. Learning programming was a HUGE hit to my understanding and trust of myself.

Most people don't go through the visceral experience of seeing how shitty the human experience lines up with reality. Such people absolutely believe in bullshit for the simple reason that it feels correct.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago

...there might well be something to that.

Yes - exactly as you say, research needs to be done on suspension of disbelief.

And thanks for sharing that fascinating idea.

[–] PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Is the word you are looking for "confirmation bias"?

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I'm not looking for a word.

Confirmation bias is about people choosing information that suits their world view. That's not what I mean. I expanded my OP to hopefully make it clearer.

I mean, the Trump admin lying to us is one thing, but they're doing it so, so badly and yet people can't let go of it.

I guess confirmation bias could be a reason why they are driven to such extreme suspension of disbelief, but I'm talking about the How here, the development maybe.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world -1 points 5 hours ago

It's about being lied to badly and still not letting go of the narrative. Wanting to take it for real so badly.

It's called 'being a fucktard'.