An actual useful court should've made this ruling on day 1
this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
763 points (99.7% liked)
World News
54020 readers
2848 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
So let me get this straight, the companies that raised their prices based on Trump's tariffs get to apply for a refund with no requirement to lower prices and pass that refund on to the consumers who actually had to pony up the money at the 'cash register' every day. Once again, corporations get an undeserved bailout while the American consumer gets shafted. Typical.
...and those refunds will flow through Howard Lutnick (and son's) business.
Just more crime. When will Americans stop bending over and taking it from these criminals?
It was supposed to be once the bread and circuses became unaffordable, but we're all so overworked that we don't have the energy to punch up.
Don't worry, it will trickle down.
Like... piss... from an overfilled adult diaper...
Even better than that is all the shit that he implemented claiming that the tarrifs would pay for them aren't going anywhere
The Supreme Court took his toy away
As if that'll stop the orange nonce.
While him and his enablers suffer no consequences then he is defacto above the law
He came back with another one.
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/02/20/us/trump-tariffs-supreme-court
“They have made their ruling, now let us see them enforce it.”
Now several companies will sue my government for damages.
yaaaaay
Bwahahahahahahahaha what a fucking toooooooooooooool !! And yet- dementia patient doubles down on MoAr TaRRiffS and I cAN DeStRoY aNy CoUnTrY 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
At his White House news conference, Trump announced alternative options, including an immediate 10% global tariff.
Lol, the US is a clown show.
Not a serious country. Just a pedo haven for reality tv stars.
I'm shocked! SHOCKED I tell you!
I am. Sincerely, I'm shocked. This is quite the surprise.
Why? Lutnick's kid had a financial benefit in the tariffs getting overturned. The Epstein class helps each other
It's not the 6-3 ruling I expected at all. Was fully thinking would be 6-3 that it was okay for him to do it not saying he can't
I mean it's such an incredibly unambiguous 9-0 on a legal basis and he still got three nonetheless.
It's not like this court is known for actually following legal basis or the constitution so 3 against not at all surprise
Understand that this is SCOTUS believing they're helping Trump by removing the unpopular tariffs while handing out huge amounts of cash in an election year
Same here, they enable everything else he's done.
The Supreme Court sided with business over the US government. No surprise there. According to the law this whole action was illegal. I am surprised it was not unanimous and had three dissenters.
Where in the fuck do companies get off thinking the tariffs, paid by consumer, is going to be refunded to them!?
Good, but prices continue to rise every time the orange dumbfuck yaps about tariffs.
So the Supreme Court finally found out what we all already knew?
But a few of them clearly still haven't gotten the memo?
I mean I'm trying to be happy about this news, but it's kind of just more proof how pathetic and corrupt our SC is.
What is he going to do with all the imaginary revenue from the tariffs now lol?
Don’t you know the US debt went down?!
If down, really means up. To the tune of adding $2.25 TRILLION since the orange dementia fat fuck took office for the 2nd time.
Another illegal {insert thing here}?
Oh, wow, is it time to arrest and charge?
Or, will you do nothing just like the 7456 times the fat cunt broke your laws in the last year and you did fuck all?
This seems like a job for drumroll+horns CHUCK SHUMER & HAKEEM JEFFRIES
Dynamic duo of incompetence extraordinaire!
This criticism makes no sense. Articles of impeachment require a simple majority in the house and then a 2/3rds majority in the Sentate.
The dems don't have the votes. Jeffries likely couldn't even get it to the house floor for a vote. Johnson wouldn't allow it.
Like we can critize them for giving the Republicans their budget or about 1,000 other issues within their power, but this isn't something they can deliver. Unless a lot of Republicans suddenly grow a conscience
At this point I'd prefer if people stopped ignoring the entire reason all this shit is going on- every single last Republican.
load more comments
(2 replies)
An illegal executive order isn't a crime, it just doesn't count.
load more comments
(1 replies)
So the only thing they rule against Trump on is the issue with almost zero human rights consequences. Everything else that is immediately endangering and killing people, no worries!
It doesn't matter. Remember all those times when Trump & Co set a tariff percentage, then lowered it a few weeks later? I wonder why? Maybe somebody made a "donation" to his bitcoin account. He got what he wanted.
load more comments
(1 replies)
He ignored the court ruling, keeps all the tariffs in place AND he raises them 10% just because the supreme court made him angry.
Think about how batshit crazy that is.
Also, funny some of you think they will refund the money. That won't happen because they will refuse to do it. Very simple for the EPSTIEN administration to just refuse legal orders. He's immune by the same supreme court.
So they are going to pay it back right?……….Right?
So...
... yeah...
According to the Fed, as of early-mid Jan 2026, you're looking at $287 billion dollars of total Trump tariff revenue.
Also, over the last year, into this one, the Treasury has been massively expanding its General Account, which is functionally the checking account of the Federal Government.
Its around $900 billion right now.
Normally its more like several hundred billion, 200 b, 300 b.
Why is it so large right now?
Well, because the Treasury (Bessent) has decided to just massively shift as much of the Gov's debt refinancing as possible, over to... short term debt issuance, like, 1 Year T bills and even shorter duration notes.
Like uh, just a few days ago, the Gov issued (refinanced) around $212 billion of debt.
So yeah, we had a one day debt rollover that... rivals the entire size of the Treasury General Account basically pre-covid.
Every 5 days (business week), the US Gov is refinancing roughly $600 billion of debt.
... what I am trying to say is that even if the treasury were to somehow pay back around $300 billion of illegal tariff revenue...
Well, that would take a while.
Because the Treasury doesn't have the margin to do that.
... It could very well be the case that Fed would have to print money, to buy the T Bills, so the money in the TGA... could repay the ... tariffs.
That latest $212 billion rollover ?
The Fed had to print, poof into existence, $8 billion of it. And thats without the Fed Gov trying to add another $300 billion into... some... kind of... payment plan?
I don't know man, I'm an econometrician by training, but... to my knowledge nothing comparable to this has ever happened before.
This is not looking so good.
Pay who back? All the citizens this administration fleeced?
If corporations are paid back they aren't going to give refunds to all of their costumers they directly forwarded these costs to.
We all got fucked. Trump fucked us, as well as his own supporters.
There are already lawsuits filed for refunds of tariff payments. Of course the money will go to the companies that made the payments. All of us who actually paid them by paying more for basically every consumer good are out of luck.
Some of us paid it to import companies prior to delivery (DHL charged us an extra $40 bucks for a couple items my wife bought online).
Companies that made the payments already sold their rights to this refunds to investment funds for cents on the dollar. Now the funds will make shitload of money. And guess who invested in all of it? Yes, people connected to Trump!
https://www.wired.com/story/cantor-fitzgerald-trump-tariff-refunds/
They straight out robbed everyone.
Yet another outrageous wealth transfer... It's almost like a game to them at this point - how many ways can they export the American taxpayer before they either run out of ideas or we put their heads on spikes?
load more comments
(5 replies)
Wealth transfer from labor to the ownership class.
Yup. This is exactly what these tariffs did.
This was the highest tax increase on the American people in decades. And MAGA idiots cheered the entire time they lost money. Fuck all of them.
Sounds like the system is working as intended.
load more comments
(6 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
Important to note that the ruling just says Trump exceeded his authority in setting the tariffs, not that the tariffs themselves were illegal/unconstitutional. That means that Congress can authorize Trump to continue doing this. The question is whether Mike Johnson and John Thune have the numbers to pass that law. They already both quashed efforts to curb Trump's authority before.
Any other ruling wouldn't have made sense. The issue was not about if tariffs are legal, but rather if the President has the authority to unilaterally set them.
load more comments
(5 replies)
view more: next ›