I fucking hate that word 'Innovation'. It is spammed by corporatebros who think their shit doesn't smell.
this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
98 points (98.0% liked)
Ask Lemmy
37948 readers
1391 users here now
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
"XYZ company already has all my data so I don't care that they're spying on me and selling my data to advertisers"
Fucking makes my blood boil. These people have absolutely zero critical thinking skills, or self respect
The thing is though, that most people don't know why that's a problem, and privacy advocates seem to think that 'you've got a door on your bathroom' is a gotcha.
If someone is giving Google their home address and work address, and planning the route to get traffic data, they're not going to be concerned when Google Maps suggests their work address as a destination through the week. Same for their shopping data. 'Of course Amazon knows what I like, I do my shopping there!'
We need better ways to explain it to people who don't understand it, and who are not interested in it or the tech behind it. We have a big problem on Lemmy where we tend to assume that everyone understands the same issues as us, just not as well.
If someone is giving Google their home address and work address, and planning the route to get traffic data, they’re not going to be concerned when Google Maps suggests their work address as a destination through the week.
It isn't that they aren't concerned, that is actually something many people see as a benefit. Yes, I still use google maps because it remembers destinations and has traffic density alerts and a bunch of other stuff that require tracking but those are a separate thing from google selling that tracking data to third parties. The former is a benefit and the latter is a problem.
If you’re entering or exiting the tram, heads the fuck up.
People with no technical background insisting that “AI” is taking over and is sentient, even when I try to explain how it actually works. They refuse to believe that maybe all of those breathless “news” articles are clickbait hype-mongering.
“You just don’t like it because it’s gonna take your job!” Keep believing that, imbeciles.
I hear a lot of people worrying about this being the case in the future but I don't remember hearing anyone claiming that about our current LLMs.
Linux nerds screeching about how Linux desktop works perfectly out of the box and with less time and effort then Windows/OsX.
It's entirely counterproductive to adoption.
It works out of the box - if you do nothing at all to it and just browse.
But to do anything like getting all of your favorite programs, that's going to take effort.
Not even. I need custom scripts for audio, can't turn my display off and on I need to pull the HDMI cable, and Bluetooth is basically unusable.
“I got my 107 year-old great grandmother running Arch from the command line in 20 minutes! Now she browses with Lynx and hosts a Matrix server.”
Something I absolutely hate is when people say shit like "do you sell an apple charger?" The complete ignorance of what port your device uses or even what it's called is infuriating. Look, you either have a usb-c or lightning port, and you only have a lightning port if your phone is from like a decade ago or something. You should know by now to look for usb-c cables. It's especially frustrating when they get angry at me when they don't understand what I'm talking about.
People need to learn innovation is not always progress, and that some paths forward are dead ends.
Not exploring the Settings menu of a new device. That should be the first thing you do when you first power on a new device. Most people just go with whatever the default settings are. Hell, some have never even seen their settings menu beyond the wifi connection.
I would love to see a majority of people stop considering 'new tech' as the magical wand/solution to all their problems, and see them stop considering 'new tech' as a necessity in their lives. Whatever their age.
My favorite is when someone tells me that they are too old to learn about new technology, or that they can’t use a device because they aren’t very tech-y. No, you just refuse to learn.
Beware of that kind of shortcuts, they often can be very wrong.
Also, do you think old people not wanting to use whatever new app or service is more of an issue than younger people not be willing to not use same app or service?
Totally. There's old duffers at work that struggle to open a word doc, but are strangely adept at Navigating Facebook...
And then there's my girlfriend, wanting help with some arcane bullshit on Facebook because I'm 'good with computers' ... but I've never used Facebook before, never even seen the page she's messing with, and I only half understand what she's trying to accomplish.
To be fair, what being "good with computers" actually means is being adept at figuring out a new thing you haven't seen before.
Computer literacy is about synthesis, not rote memorization. I like citing this interview, talking about software as "building blocks with which you can create things," as a great example of what knowing how to use a computer properly is really like. (Note that the point isn't the specific detail of the UNIX CLI, but the principle that he can imagine a novel workflow and make it happen.)
Speaking of which, that's my "something about how people view or use technology that needs to die:" the notion that you can be "computer literate" without understanding how to program, at least a little bit. The entire difference between a computer and any of the technologies that came before it is that a computer doesn't have a fixed function, and you can make it do whatever you want it to do as long as you have the imagination and skill to figure out how to describe it.
Clicking OK without reading the box.
It won't work, I get an error.
What's the error say?
Let me try again. Ok it says enter a time.
Did you enter a time?
No.
Except that there are about 100 questions on the page and there is no prompt to go to the question you missed.
Many sites are just poorly designed.
dear god, if people actually read the screen, most Helpdesk jobs would be gone. read the damn screen, put that into your favourite search engine. bam. profit.
And an actual search engine... Not an LLM prompt. A plain regular search engine!
Put the error wording in quotes. Scroll past the AI LLM response they force at the top. That first result under there almost certainly gives you the answer.
Or someone on Reddit with the ever-useless, "That never happens to me".
You've met my mother in law, I see. And my dad. Why do they do that? It must be an age thing.
It's a "can't be bothered" thing: age is irrelevant.
That transcends all ages, it has to be related to the irresistibility of big red buttons.
Being completely uncritical of it. This ties into being unwilling to learn, if they're introduced to word processors via MS Word, many people are completely unwilling to move to something else like LibreOffice Writer, even if it's not actually that different.
Back to the first sentence, too many people just aren't willing to consider the ramifications of living in a walled garden made and maintained by foreign far-right groups, or if they are generally aware and critical of it, it usually still not enough to actually do something against it. That includes people who are generally tech savy, most of my millenial-or-younger friends and relatives aren't on Signal, including one who is a software developer and vocally critical of Trump and US tech companies. Meanwhile my parents and grandparents have no issue using Signal.
And what makes so many people so willing to look at ads? I know way too many people who could easily use adblockers if they wanted, but just don't.
My parents are older, in their late 60s and 70s, neither of them are particularly tech-savvy. They're not totally helpless, they'll usually do an alright job of basic troubleshooting like making sure things are plugged in, turning it off and on again, even look around a bit for settings and try to Google their problems before calling me.
They'd been using a copy of office 2003 or something like that age since that was new, they had the disk and didn't feel any need to upgrade to a newer version. At some point they "upgraded" their computer to windows 11 which finally seemed to break compatibility with that old version of office.
Of the two of them, my mom is slightly more technically savvy. They had started using Google docs at her job before she retired, so she was able to switch to that with no major issues.
My dad couldn't quite get the hang of that. I put libre office on their computer and told him it was just like Microsoft but free, and he's been using that just fine since then.
Their computer, while technically compatible with Windows 11, seems to really struggle with it. They're old retired people, they watch YouTube, do basic word processing and spreadsheets, check their emails, and go on Facebook. It's not a beefy computer and they don't need one, I'm pretty sure there are smart toasters or something these days that can do everything they need.
On a whim I stuck a bootable USB flash drive with Linux Mint on it in their computer about a week ago, and have had them test drive that. It does everything they need, they've had no issues with it so far, and even running off a flash drive it's been running smoother than windows 11.
So when I go visit them tomorrow I'm gonna be making some backups and installing Linux on their computer.
Pretty much the one program they use that's not a web browser or office software they use is Hallmark card studio (2007 I think) to print their own cards. Not gonna be the end of the world if they can't use that anymore, but fingers crossed I'll be able to get that running in wine. Wine HQ lists its compatibility as garbage but I don't think anyone has tried to do it in a few years and wine has come a long way recently, so I'm cautiously optimistic.
So if these two old people can learn to use libre office and Linux, no one has an excuse.
Honestly, Linux is great for two groups:
A) People who extremely tech-savvy.
B) People who aren't tech savvy at all.
It's the people in the middle, the people who know just enough to get themselves in trouble, who want to screw around with things and do weird custom stuff, but aren't good enough at it to handle learning a new OS, those are the people in the middle Linux isn't well suited for. But the two opposite ends of the technical ability spectrum are perfect for Linux.
I think Linux has a peculiar learning curve. If someone else installs it for you and does basic tech support once in a while, and installs a beginner-friendly distro, and the users only use very basic stuff like word processors and browser-based social media, it's really easy, even easier than Windows. For people who know just about enough to install new software and reinstall Windows, Linux can be fairly difficult since a lot of the system plumbing just works quite differently, and these users are also tempted to install more difficult-to-use-and-maintain distros. Then once you're very tech-savvy, Linux becomes easier than Windows again because it mostly does what you want and doesn't fight you like Windows, and it's often a first class citizen when it comes to software development.
Yeah, it's absolutely a weird curve like that
I'm kind of in the second batch where things get hard, I've managed to keep myself from diving headfirst into some crazy hard to maintain distro and biting off more than I can chew, but it's really weird not knowing how things the way I did on windows.
load more comments
(4 replies)
WAY too many people don't realize "AI" is just marketing bullshit, and genuinely think that LLMs and shit are literal intelligence in a computer.
For one, it's driving every company under the sun to shove it into every product under the sun; and two, if we ever do create a true AI (what we're calling "AGI" now, at least until marketing drives that one to meaninglessness too and we have to move the goal posts again), it's going to be humanity changer in par with shit like discovering fire... and people will be confused as all hell becuase "wE've hAd tHAt foR yEArS!" cuz they'll think its the same spell-checker-that's-wrong-occaisionally-and-generates-nudes that we have today.
LLMs are AI - always have been. The term “artificial intelligence” has always been broad in computer science: it covers anything that performs a cognitive task normally requiring human intelligence. A chess engine from 1999 is AI. A spam filter is AI. An LLM is AI. Narrow AI, sure, but still AI.
The confusion comes from people equating “AI” with sci-fi AGI (human-level general intelligence, HAL/JARVIS/Skynet/etc.). That’s a specific subset, not the whole category. When companies say “AI-powered” they’re not claiming AGI - they’re saying the product uses machine learning or pattern recognition in some way. Marketing inflates the language, yes, but the underlying tech is real and fits the definition.
If/when we reach actual AGI, it will be a civilization-level shift - far beyond today’s spell-checker-that-sometimes-hallucinates. People will look back and say “we had AI for years,” but they’ll mean narrow tools, not the thing that can invent new science or run a company autonomously. The goalposts aren’t moving; the hype is just using the broad term loosely.
LLMs are AI - always have been. The term “artificial intelligence” has always been broad in computer science: it covers anything that performs a cognitive task normally requiring human intelligence.
On the contrary, it's not "AI" unless it's a fuckton of hand-programmed if statements. I dunno what this newfangled "neural network" shit is, but it's way too brain-like to be AI! \s
Paying for everything, especially things you can be getting for free.
The idea that if you're not paying for something then you're the product is rhetoric for suckers so they don't recognize how they're being fleeced.
Troll. Smiling and sunshine is free, all other things require some sort of payment in this world.
Some stuff is indeed free, although, some other stuff seems free because you're paying with something else that is not money.
A lot of tech evolves and changes quickly, and a whole lot of people just dont like change, especially as they get older. It is also harder to learn new things as you get older. While it doesn't apply across the board, the "can't teach an old dog" addage generally holds true. This is not something that will go away. If you dont want to become that person, continue to exercise your brain as you age, and learning new tricks will be easier.
As someone in the "older" crowd, I can learn just about anything, I'm just sick and fucking tired of lazy ass devs who can't be bothered to write proper fucking docs.
Note: I've been writing docs for going on 40 years as part of my job. It's fucking tedious to do it well, to verify what you wrote actually works.
No, it's not that it's harder to learn (it may be) it's that I have other shit to do too, and some dumbass has made using whatever tool way fucking more obtuse than it needs to be and hasn't bothered to even explain their approach, their paradigm, in the all but non-existent docs.
Github's website is an example - it leads with changes, the intro is halfway down the page, even then most descriptions are terse. Tech writers the world around are having strokes every time they have to look at it.
My dwindling interest in the the new hotness for tech is due to diminishing returns and how frequently it is change for the sake of change with zero additional benefit. I still learn new stuff, but only after it has been out long enough to find out if there is an actual benefit involved.
Seriously, the amount of things that are just repackaged stuff that already existed but now it is cheaply produced and unreliable is overwhelming. Brands don't even stick to their purpose for a decade before selling out and letting quality slip.
Somehow, most changes I've seen in the last ~10 years seem to be enshittification ...
It's hard to motivate yourself to make an effort when the hot new tech is stuff like LLMs.
load more comments
(1 replies)
The problem is that you often can't learn because the app's instructions are a year behind.
Or, for my pet hate with FOSS, the instructions assume that you understand the underlying technology.
'Hey, we've made this fantastic new program for Linux newbs, it's so easy that even your grandma can use it! To install it, clone the repo and pipe the results of awk through sed using grep. You can add flags in the usual way!'
Generative algorithms, and the people intent on replacing artists with them.
Also everyone labeling and/or peddling these things as "Artificial Intelligence".
Also all of the corporations trying to shoehorn them into every product and service and ram them down user's throats.
Also every user that patronizes these things voluntarily.
I think we're coming to the end of a 50 year cycle of rapid technological improvement that's been a parasitic host for capitalistic predilections. Shareholders ride tech companies hard and put them away wet, fucking over workers and squeezing consumers in the process. Innovative and awesome companies end up getting subsumed into a shit whirlpool where the product gets worse, more expensive, and steals your data. So I guess the people in my example are the tech investors and MBAs feeding them, and their abuse of tech is what needs to die.
I'm tired of people breaking software. If your software broke because of a dependency then next time maybe you shouldn't introduce one.
Or it is poorly documented. Like what, you think you've made a quantum kind of software that is so special you felt you didn't need to jot any notes down of it?
view more: next ›