this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
284 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

81534 readers
4404 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

California’s new bill requires DOJ-approved 3D printers that report on themselves targeting general-purpose machines.

Assembly Member Bauer-Kahan introduced AB-2047, the “California Firearm Printing Prevention Act,” on February 17th. The bill would ban the sale or transfer of any 3D printer in California unless it appears on a state-maintained roster of approved makes and models… certified by the Department of Justice as equipped with “firearm blocking technology.” Manufacturers would need to submit attestations for every make and model. The DOJ would publish a list. If your printer isn’t on the list by March 1, 2029, it can’t be sold. In addition, knowingly disabling or circumventing the blocking software is a misdemeanor.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cantaloupe@lemmy.fedioasis.cc 8 points 12 hours ago

This is true and very underreported.

[–] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 30 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Just when I think California couldn't possibly come up with dumber laws, they deliver yet again.

There's genuine concerns they could be addressing but instead go after something that's going to be near impossible for them to enforce.

Blueprints for homemade 3D printers exist that can be built with a pretty short list of parts from Digikey.

[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It’s not law yet, and may never be.

[–] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 3 points 10 hours ago

That's comforting to hear. Thank you.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I was going to say, I thought open source 3D Printer designs/kits have been a thing for awhile. My friend just built his own last year using his original 3D printer to help in the process, lol

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The entire hobby is built on open source, it’s only very very recently that commercial hobby level printers were worth a damn

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

...And even then, they're leveraging the open source under the hood. Even your locked-down Bambu piece of shit uses slicing software based on Slic3r.

[–] meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Wait so far these things are relatively trivial pieces of equipment in terms of software, no? Read instructions, move stepper motors/control heating elements.

So realistically what we're looking at is hash based block lists for known firearm and parts designs, which would be trivial to circumvent by adding the equivalent of noop instructions to the .gcode files 🤷‍♂️

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

They'll do anything but adopt firearm laws that are relevant and sensible.

[–] iggy@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair, California has some of the strictest gun laws in the US. That's a low bar though.

[–] SalamenceFury@piefed.social 3 points 10 hours ago

And most of those laws are either stupid, out of touch, racist, or multiple of those. In a fair amount of times it's all three.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

No, realistically what we're looking at is a full ban on 3D printing as a whole because anything the printer does "might" be a gun part.

And then shortly after, a ban on property rights as a whole, because anything you own with a circuit board or a stepper motor in it "might" be modified to create an illegal 3D printer.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 4 points 12 hours ago
[–] SalamenceFury@piefed.social 13 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (3 children)

HEY CALIFORNIA DO YOU KNOW WHO IS LEADING THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE RIGHT NOW????? WHY ARE YOU COMING UP WITH THIS AT ALL, LET ALONE WITH THIS ADMINISTRATION IN POWER????

Oh wait, Gavin Newsom is the governor, that explains everything. Of course the DINO who's only mad at Trump for stealing his spotlight would try to push a stupid law like this.

[–] iggy@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

This law is stupid, but it's coming from some nobody in the bay area trying to get her name out there, not Newsom

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] eli@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
  1. The printer doesn't know what it is printing, the slicer does, and at that point just use an open source slicer
  2. Just drive to Arizona, Nevada, or Oregon, buy a printer, and drive back, The MicroCenter in Phoenix just opened up.
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 15 hours ago (6 children)

I could make a working metal gun in a day with hand tools and a trip to home depot. Guns aren't magical complicated devices. It's a handle and a tube and a pin that smacks a bullet.

This bill is the epitome of stupid and one of the reasons the left has had so many issues becoming the party leaders. Stop trying to play "big brother" and stop trying to fuck with the 2nd amendment.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 3 points 10 hours ago

They wanna plug their ears and pretend slam fire pipe shotguns aren't a thing. Like seriously all you need is two short pipes, a cap and a bolt for the firing pin. You can use the sidewalk to grind down the bolt so you don't even need another tool.

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Shovel AK is still a thing, but this is not about guns. That is just the cloak of fear (ie - protect the children!) for legislating away your right to own things. Corpos are pissed you can make and/or repair the things they'd rather you buy again.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

What are they going to do? Put IoT DRM in every stepper motor?

[–] freshcow@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

Already contacted my assembly person to oppose it. I get the intent behind it, but theres no way im going to ask the government for permission to use my own hardware.
I dont even own a 3D printer yet, but I wouldn't want to be subject to such a bad and dumb law if and when that changes.

[–] skip0110@lemmy.zip 4 points 14 hours ago

But….if someone sold a manually operated plastic extruder, that’s fine?

And if someone separately sold CAM software that’s fine too?

Just sayin’

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›