this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
28 points (96.7% liked)

PC Gaming

8914 readers
50 users here now

Rule #1: Be civil

Rule #2: No spam, memes, off-topic, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #3: No advertisements

Rule #4: No streams, random gameplay videos, highlights, or shorts

Rule #5: No erotic games or porn

Rule #6: No facilitating piracy

Rule #7: No duplicates

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Why yes (loading screen) we're in fact (loading screen) utilizing an (loading screen) updated version (loading screen) of (loading screen) the creation engine for (loading screen) TES6. We don't want (loading screen) to change much (loading screen) about how the game is (loading screen) created because (loading screen) we rely on modders (loading screen) to actually make (loading screen) our games enjoyable.

[–] _hovi_@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

For anyone else who got rage baited by starfield 2: it's just him saying they're gonna add content to the game, NOT starfield 2.

ES6 in another decade maybe?

[–] themoken@startrek.website 8 points 1 month ago

Yeah, big difference between "Starfield 2" and "Starfield 2.0", one is a sequel, the other is a version.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Lol, yeah I was confused at first considering how much of a flop starfield was. The only thing keeping it alive is the star wars mod community it seems

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Is anyone expecting anything else than a broken mess at release at that point from them?

[–] CidVicious@piefed.zip 6 points 1 month ago

I don't think Starfield was ridiculously broken at release? It was just boring.

My prediction:

Starfield was so far behind the current standards i have zero faith this will be in a playable state before 2033 and it will still barely look as good as currently available games.

[–] howler@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Starfield 2? Lol