this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
631 points (99.8% liked)

News

35962 readers
2855 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/43334510

The Department of Justice spoke four separate times to a woman who credibly accused Donald Trump of having sex with a minor he met through Jeffrey Epstein—but most accusations against the president appear to have been removed from the government’s documents on the alleged sex trafficker. 

21-page slideshow buried in the massive trove of Epstein-related documents included allegations that sometime between 1983 and 1985, Trump forced a woman to give him oral sex when she was in her early teens. When the woman bit down on Trump’s exposed penis, he allegedly punched her in the head and kicked her out. That same woman told the DOJ that Epstein had introduced her to Trump in 1984.

Yet last week, Attorney General Pam Bondi insisted that there was “no evidence” that Trump had committed any crime—adding to the growing pile of denials from Trump officials that constitute a sweeping cover-up of the president’s alleged wrongdoing. 

Justice Department records indicate that the FBI spoke to this woman not once but at least four separate times, according to independent journalist Roger Sollenberger. Now those records appear to have been removed from public viewing—despite the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires all documents relating to the alleged sex trafficker to be made public. 

Sollenberger discovered a record of four separate interviews, which took place in the summer of 2019, in a separate database of documents downloaded from the government’s public files on Epstein. That document indicated that the first of the four interviews was conducted on July 24, 2019, and the last conducted on October 16, 2019. That document was given to Ghislaine Maxwell’s lawyers as part of her trial, though the specific allegations predated Maxwell’s involvement with Epstein, Sollenberger wrote.

The woman’s first interview was entered into the FBI’s case files on August 9, 2019, just one day before Epstein was found dead in his jail cell. FBI agents typically have a deadline of five working days to file interview write-ups, indicating an abnormal 16-day gap, Sollenberger noted.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 18 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Is there anyone from this administration that doesn't deserve to end up mulched and chummed?

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 30 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

Welcome to fascism. Just couldn't vote for Harris? You did this.

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 57 minutes ago (1 children)

The capitalist class did this to us. Blame the people who allowed fascism to rise...which absolutely includes Biden and Harris!

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 2 points 23 minutes ago

The people still voted for trump in greater numbers than Harris. No ifs or buts about that fact. It is the people's responsibility to stay educated and to actually go vote. It's been shown that nations with compulsory voting gain more support for the left. Yes, there is a problem with the Epstein class and capitalism, but that doesn't absolve non-voters and those who voted for fascism from blame.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Bro the people that didn't vote for harris ain't here. Not enough of them to realistically blame, anyway.

[–] suddenlyme@lemmy.zip 11 points 10 hours ago

Trump should never have been on the ticket.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 6 points 9 hours ago

America still hates women too much for that.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

But Harris didn’t say she was going to solve all the world’s problems immediately! She wanted to personally murder every single Palestinian person. Or something.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 2 points 33 minutes ago

She had a funny laugh.

But realistically she had a vagina and voters aren't super fond of that. If she'd have been a man, she'd have won. I'll get downvoted and accused of being misogynist but it's voters who are, especially women.

And now she's running again and god help us if the party makes the same mistake in 2028, if we have real elections.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 16 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

So the FBI had an interview about the then president sexually assaulting/raping a child and them punching her in the face when it didn't go his way. The interview evidence gets mishandled and instead of taking 5 business days required to file it took 12 business days. The next day the person who connected the President to these charges is found dead. With his brother requesting a secondary otopsy because he believed his brother was murdered, and the review showed they did not believe the death to be suicide. And the footage mysteriously having issues as well. And the people who moved the body had no recollection of removing a noose.

This is nothing but a conspiracy, lol

[–] Safetyshaft@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

I’m convinced that kiddiefucker is alive and well

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

So Jeffrey Epstein is pretty much just another partner or employee Trump threw under the bus. And I'm beginning to think it's more the *latter.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

More evidence tampering

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 173 points 21 hours ago (7 children)

Who wrote this shit, "...Trump forced a woman to give him oral sex when she was in her early teens.." so a teenager or child and not a woman then?

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 1 points 39 minutes ago

Depressingly common. “Had sex with an underage woman”. So, raped a child

[–] Daviino@lemmy.world 19 points 14 hours ago

Always the same language. Same deal with underaged black versus white kids. One is called a young man, the other a kid. Guess who is who.

[–] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 109 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

US media keeps calling the children in the Epstein files women for some reason. It’s been an ongoing theme. German speaking media will occasionally use the German word for minor, but they often also just lazily translate from US sources and use the German word for women/woman.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 66 points 20 hours ago

It's called sane washing. The US media is owned by people who are likely in the files too.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 22 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

We need to have a simple check in the government and media. Everyone who thinks a 13 year old is a woman please stand on this side of the room. Everyone else please leave the room. Then we drone strike the room with the earthquake bomb.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The 13 year ol side of the room opens up into a pungee pit and they all fall inside and have to slowly bleed out.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Into a gaint woodchipper running at 1/4th the speed?

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Actually ome of those metal shredders works better.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

I used to run the wood chipper in an old saw mill in Ontario. It would take an 8' log 15" in diameter and chip it before you could say one-one thou ...

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 38 points 18 hours ago

Yes. The allegation should be phrased that he beat and raped a child.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

She's a woman now, and was when the interviews occurred over 30 years after the sexual assaults.

The woman was sexually assaulted when she was in her early teens.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Loterally says "Forced a woman"

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 34 minutes ago

As opposed to "forced a a teenager to have oral sex with him when washed was 30 years younger?"

It literally specifies that she was a teenager when the crime occurred in the same sentence you're criticizing.

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I think the intended meaning is that she was a woman when the allegations were made but the (alleged) events took place when she was in her early teens.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I know we're all programmed to give people the benefit of the doubt. To try to find sense in any situation. To use Hanlon's razor.

When it comes to Trump, please stop. He doesn't deserve this excess of leniency. He's a child rapist and murderer running the country. Do not try to find sense when there is nothing but cruelty and abuse. It makes a lot more sense when confronted by evidence of cruelty and malice at such a staggering scale to use a reverse Hanlon's razor with Trump.

They're called women to purposefully obfuscate the fact Trump beat and raped a little girl. One of many.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I certainly wouldn't give trump the benefit of the doubt, but that's not what you're talking about. You're saying we mustn't give the people writing these reports the benefit of the doubt. I'd guess you'd also say we shouldn't give any republican supporters the benefit of the doubt (they might well echo the reporting after all), so that really it rapidly becomes only giving those the benefit of the doubt who are on your side.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

When it comes to stories about Trump, any evidence that he's being portrayed as anything but a child raping felon implies that the story is purposefully biased to help him.

No reasonable person would hold a differing opinion.

Now whether I give those same people the benefit of the doubt concerning non-Trump matters is a different story.

Reverse Hanlon's razor applies to Trump and has a transferable property regarding anything related to Trump to at least 1-2 connections.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 52 minutes ago

Well, you can think what you like but you're going to draw wrong, unhelpful conclusions more often with that attitude. 🤷

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

god help me my dad will huff and puff about biden this and biden that and some made up 'good' shit trump did whenever more trump shit comes out.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

"Well at least Biden wasn't a pedophile or a rapist."

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 77 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

mOsT tRanSpaReNt PreSiDeNt EvEr

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 80 points 21 hours ago

Despite his efforts it's looking pretty transparent that he raped children.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 59 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I don't even know what to say about how ham-fisted and just plain dumb this attempt to rewrite history is. What's depressing is that for far too many people, it'll still work.

If we make it through this, history textbooks are going to need to have chapters on what cult-think does to people, and like half of it will be about MAGA.

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 37 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

You mean like Hitler and Germany?

We already have history textbooks about this..... there's even a pretty popular book that is a great allegory for what's going on. Based sometime in the 1980s I believe.

[–] joker125@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Sadly too many idiots in America do no read.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 24 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

The internet has given us a nice archive of the thoughts of brainwashing victims that didn't exist in Nazi Germany.

Personally I think Brave New World is a better representation of our dystopia than 1984. People aren't trying to avoid thoughtcrime because they're afraid of a boot to the neck (yet) but are instead lulled into complacency by a "keep your head down" culture and lulled into complicity by a "choose your own truth" media landscape.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 28 points 20 hours ago (15 children)

Sometimes I wish I could be a believer in religion so that I might have solace that evil people will at least face divine justice in death even if they received no Earthly justice in life. Alas, the depressing truth is that evil coasts through life without facing justice all the time, and the good just as often fall victim to the machinations, crimes, and sadism of the evil and never find any justice, retribution or closure after it. It's one of the reasons that I don't believe unfortunately.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 20 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Where's the defamation lawsuit, Mr. I Sue Everybody?

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Even Trump's attorneys know that truth is an ironclad libel defense

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Oscar Wilde has entered the chat

load more comments
view more: next ›