this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
652 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

81611 readers
4295 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shirro@aussie.zone 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every company does that. The difference is the AI companies will be broke soon and laying off all their staff so people are getting out before the collapse.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago

Exactly. And some of them are rats fleeing a sinking ship. Just look at Mrinank Sharma, who got paid a million bucks or so for a year at Anthropic, then ditched.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh thank heavens some people still have ethics.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 0 points 23 hours ago

if they had ethics they would have left a long time ago.

[–] Coyote_sly@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There's a huge list of eye rolls here but also...what profits?

🌎 👨‍🚀 🔫 👨‍🚀

[–] HexParte@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just another day in corporate America. Putting fake profits over employees’s well-beings, and customer safety and privacy.

The thing that gets me is they just want to get in on this $2Billion investment that keeps changing hands without changing hands. They really are just taking IOUs from… elsewhere? Because apparently, according to Jensen, that money hasn’t actually exchanged hands. Investors are just buying into the new Ponzi Scheme.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The alternative prediction is that this is in fact sustainable and AI companies will in fact have revenue to keep the bubble inflated for a lot longer, just in the worst way - by extracting the value of human-created reliability and trust from the market:

CEOs have also bought into AI almost to a person, and are using it to replace workers, results be damned. AI can't do the things they believe it can, but to them, if they can fake satisfying a need with AI for $5, that is preferable to actually satisfying a need with a real employee for $10.

The CEO is happy because his company saved $5 and he's met his stock option incentive target, the AI companies are happy to pocket that $5 instead of the employee getting $10. Maybe they even raise the customer's price to $12 as AI rent-seeking starts rising, and both companies get $6 each. Win-win, life will go on, just worse for everyone else.

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

CEOs have also bought into AI almost to a person, and are using it to replace workers, results be damned. AI can’t do the things they believe it can, but to them, if they can fake satisfying a need with AI for $5, that is preferable to actually satisfying a need with a real employee for $10.

Yep that's exactly how me and my entire team were laid off. "Automatization".

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm sorry. Recently laid off myself and management avoided directly saying AI was the reason, but other statements (C-suite talking about whether AI can do other work months before the layoffs, in front of me) convince me that was the reasoning.

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah for us it was "return to office". Entire team was remote and has been the 9 years I worked there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"They are putting profits over sanity and safety"

Soooooooo, just like every other business in the history of capitolism?

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It worked for airline manufacturers, it can work for you too!

[–] XLE@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I hate to hand it to airline manufacturers, but at least when they cut corners, they actually make money. The whole AI industry still hasn't turned a profit yet...

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Talents leave

Tell me a "journalist" has no concept of mass nouns without using those words.

[–] dustyvagina@lemmy.zip 3 points 23 hours ago

We're so cooked

[–] suicidaleggroll@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Publicly traded companies are legally required to put profits over sanity, safety, and everything else. It's a truly insane system we've put together for ourselves.

load more comments (2 replies)

They are putting profits over sanity and safety

First time?

[–] bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's so nice to see these kind of posts. Because I keep thinking I'm the only one who thinks ai has turned incredibly evil and will only get worse.

“One Program to rule them all, One Program to find them, One Program to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them.”

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't worry, the Internet keeps telling me that AI is a useless stochastic parrot that hallucinates everything it says anyway.

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Both of these things can be true. It still works if it occasionally throws a few innocents in front of the bus.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thus, by a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak.

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mate, where do I even begin here.

  1. People have different opinions.

  2. AI can make horrifying mistakes and still on average do its intended purpose. If you catch 90% murderers and 10% innocents, that is apparently good enough for quite a few governments.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People have different opinions.

You literally just said you held both.

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Alright, have a nice day

[–] melfie@lemy.lol 3 points 1 day ago

Breaking news: a for-profit corporation did something shitty to make number go up. In other news, it was recently discovered that ticks feed on their hosts’ blood with no concern for the well-being of their hosts.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›