this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
716 points (99.7% liked)

World News

54020 readers
3281 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary
Police say King Charles's brother is in custody and officers are carrying out searches at addresses in Berkshire and Norfolk - read the police statement in full

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 34 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

I did not expect this.

Sadly, this proves that even the infamously evil ROYAL FAMILY has more integrity than Trump and our politicians (including Democrats).

Which is fucking terrifying, really. Brace yourselves, keep your chin up, and all of that

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Note that he didn't got arrested for the pedophilia part.

Also, this being Britain, best wait until the end of the trial to see if he gets convicted and if the sentence is in line with that for similar situations

When comes to nobles over there using the Justice System as a form of whitewash is pretty standard: there's this story of some Peer getting convicted for a second time for Fraud and the high court judge letting him go without any penalty saying that "the shame of a conviction is enough".

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 23 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Someone on bluesky said that SCOTUS has made American presidents less accountable than British monarchs

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago

I cannot disagree! We can see the effects of "corporations are people" and "money is free speech" all around us.

Every year the corporate dystopia gets more obscene.

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 11 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Some of those who have billions

Are the same who rape children

RATM

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

I wsn't expecting to develop begrudging respect for England today.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

Add South Korea to the list.

That also Filipinos have sent Duterte to The Hague.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (2 children)
[–] fiat_lux@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They have to, this was for pre-charge questioning, and they have time limits on custody for that. They've also searched 3 of his properties and his former residence. The question now is when and if they formally charge him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

He's not getting out of the eventual trial, and considering the time frames I really doubt he's winning.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The grand old Duke of York

he had 12 million quid

He gave it to someone he’d never met

for something he never did

[–] davetortoise@reddthat.com 12 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Well actually it was the taxpayer that had 12 million quid, then gave it to a sweaty nonce for some ungodly reason

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hyaline_Cat@lemmy.world 33 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Funny how I knew it wasn't in America not because of the name, but because someone in public office went into custody.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 18 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

He's being arrested for sharing official documents. Not the disgusting crimes he committed against children and/or women. It's not real accountability, it's theater meant to placate the angry masses.

[–] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 14 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

I read some analysis on this in the guardian, it predicted this would happen, because the police have limited resources and can only follow up one of the two charges. This charge is chosen because there is far more likely to be incontrovertible evidence, probably in the form of paper trails etc. Whereas proving he raped children decades ago relies on witness testimony, which is far easier for his very expensive (taxpayer-funded, mind) lawyers to talk down in court.
If this cunt sees a single day in prison I call that a win.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

A good sentiment, though I suspect you shouldn't hold your breath on the prison thing - he's already been released from custody.

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c70kjr9wjw0t

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Go check out the fawning coverage of The Royals by The Guardian over the years.

It surprises me not at all that "on such an unfortunate occasion" The Guardian would be busy spinning a "reasonable" rationally for not taking to court a member of the Royal Family for those crimes which would result in a lot of dirty linen being washed in public.

"The policy have limited resources, nothing we can do about it, best let it go"

(Curiously, the police have the resources to, for example, go after people against the Genocide in Gaza as Terrorist Supporters or Demonstrators for "Disturbing Public Order")

[–] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 2 points 4 hours ago

I'm in complete agreement

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

Trump had crates full of official documents in his bathroom and nobody touched him in four years.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 178 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As an American I find this confusing to arrest a rich, powerful person on criminal charges.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Especially a rich white person

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

A rich, white, pedophile! Arrested. Have they no respect? What will they do next... tax them?

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They're not going after him for Pedophilia.

Apparently as per the rationale of some very pro-Royal British newspapers, the police doesn't have the resources to properly investigate and prosecute him for Pedophilia, even though according to the news just the other day they arrest 1000 people a year for that very crime.

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Yes, I've read. I hope it's one those "Al Capone arrested for Tax Evasion" things where they just went for the one that was easier to prove. I know very little about UK law, but I doubt he would have been arrested on those charges if he hadn't been already disgraced.

But my joke was more on other rich, white, alleged pedophiles with ties to Epstein and the weird fact that people keep bringing those things up when the DOW is over 50000

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thehatfox@lemmy.world 254 points 1 day ago (7 children)

As a British person that's something I thought I'd never see.

Arrested on his birthday too.

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 103 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The late queen's protection of him was a blemish on her record. I'm happy the king has cut him loose to face consequences..... I wonder if they asked him before the arrest...

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf 39 points 1 day ago (18 children)

They didn't.

"The Press Association is reporting that neither King Charles nor Buckingham Palace was informed in advance of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s arrest."

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/live/2026/feb/19/police-arrest-former-prince-andrew-mountbatten-windsor-sandringham-latest-updates

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 56 points 1 day ago

Almost certainly; Andrew lives on Charles’ private estate.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

And what a record it was! Empire’s torture, internment and state killings, racist borders and racist policing, catastrophic wars sold on certainty they didn’t have, colonialism and ethnic cleansing and genocides, a little bit of family racism drama as a cherry on top, and a strong propaganda machine to sell her as a sweet old woman without much power and to ensure people still defend her and worship her.

Her record was too tarnished to blemish.

[–] fiat_lux@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I'm not British but I'm also very surprised. I can't help but wonder if they would have dared had he still had his title?

on his birthday too.

The cops took the phrase "the icing on the cake" literally, and I think it was an excellent choice.

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 47 points 1 day ago (12 children)

I can't help but wonder if they would have dared had he still had his title?

I would assume that the king and other interested parties will have known this was coming for a while and that is why he lost his title.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 108 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There is more happening on a global level from the findings in the Epstein files then there is in the US. The US just gets tweets and soundbites on the news. The US is a joke.

[–] MunkyNutts@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Sadly, as I understood from a report I saw this morning, it's not in connection to his pedophilia but to sending highly sensitive gov docs to Epstein which may have been used for financial gain.

[–] greygore@lemmy.world 16 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

And they arrested and imprisoned Al Capone for tax evasion. The important part is they arrested him, and secondly that it was for something related to Epstein. Hopefully the ensuing investigation will cause more details to be revealed and a wider reckoning to occur, but either way, he’s no longer free.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 hours ago

In the UK there's quite the tradition of using the Justice System to merelly whitewash the crimes of the Aristocracy, so better wait until the trial is over before one starts celebrating this.

[–] MunkyNutts@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

I'm hopeful, Al wasn't as well connected as Andrew, and seeing how the US has pursued it, I hope the UK does better.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago

But at least he's been arrested for something

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 11 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

Meanwhile in america: {crickets, followed by a tumbleweed blowing across a sand covered road}

And that's after the obese orange child rapist was best friends with Epstein for decades, and has been mentioned many thousands of times, with thousands of pictures, and numerous sexual accusations all in the Epstein files.
The fat cunt could shoot a baby live on TV and no fucker would do a thing about it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kraiden@piefed.social 75 points 1 day ago (8 children)

over the alleged sharing of confidential material by the former prince with late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein

Really? Not because he's a sex offender himself maybe? I'm happy to see an arrest, but fucking really!?

[–] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 70 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That was probably the best angle to start an in-depth investigation into his dealings with Epstein. Evidence that comes to light during that investigation can still be used for additional charges.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

They got Capone on tax evasion, etc.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FishFace@piefed.social 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Because even in the Epstein files most people aren't saying "ay Jeff, cheers for the fifteen year-old lasses we all shagged, see you next time," but they are saying "here are the minutes of the cabinet meeting/this is what the prime minister thinks about regulating your company/this is the most he's willing to give you a tax break for" in emails because that stuff had to be communicated somehow.

We can all see that Andrew probably committed some sex crimes. But being a suspicious creepy fucker, being accused, and having a photo of you crouching over a girl would not be enough evidence to get you or me charged with a crime either. The counterweight to "nobody is above the law" is "nobody shall be convicted except on the evidence."

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago

I wonder if he's finally sweating now.

[–] varnia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This should put enough pressure for Trump to be next, right my US American fiends?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

HOLY CRAP IT'S REAL.

I didn't believe it when I first saw it. FUCKING AWESOME.

load more comments
view more: next ›