this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
7 points (88.9% liked)

Physics

1894 readers
82 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
7
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by noxar_ad@thelemmy.club to c/physics@mander.xyz
 

Shouldn't the slopped distance be considered instead of the height?

(Sayonara Zetsubou Sensei: chapter 233)

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Admetus@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hello, Physics teacher here! Key to the concept of energy aka work is its definition:

Work done on an object = force X distance moved in the direction of the force. This can also apply when the force is in the opposite direction to the movement, i.e. gravitational force down, movement up. We say we're doing work against gravity.

So the slope introduces horizontal movement but the absence of horizontal forces makes this irrelevant to the problem here. It only becomes relevant when say, sliding and friction is introduced!

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's a deceptive thing, that incline.

As a human doing the work (human definition), it's intuitively less work to use the slope.

But in measurable, calculable physics terms, the slope only changes the time over which the Work (Physics definition) is done.

In this scenario since acceleration is near zero, it doesn't matter.

[–] jjj@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not quite, you have to multiply distance by the force applied to the object (its weight in Newtons), but they're using its mass (kilograms).

It's actually 98 Nm, since weight = mass * gravitational acceleration and g ≈ 9.8 m/s² (you'll see people give more digits but it actually varies by at most 0.1 m/s² or so depending on where you are).