this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
1 points (100.0% liked)

Green & indigenous News

123 readers
57 users here now

A community for Green & indigenous news!

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 

February 17, 2026 – Officials at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a final guidance document on Friday that advises drug companies to set “duration limits” for livestock antibiotics in animal feed, without legally obligating them to do so.

The duration limit—the maximum length of time a drug should be given—covers medically important antibiotics, which are those used for livestock that are also important in human medicine.

When such antibiotics are used for long periods, the risk of bacteria developing resistance to those antibiotics increases. As bacteria develop resistance to more drugs, treating human illnesses becomes harder.

In a notice announcing the final guidance, officials said it is “intended to mitigate development of antimicrobial resistance for these antimicrobial drugs.”

But public health advocates said the new policy represents a step backward. They note that the agency did not include an upper limit for all drugs, nor did it require companies to consider how duration limits might contribute to increasing antibiotic resistance that could harm humans. The news comes just weeks after FDA data revealed a 2024 spike in sales of medically important drugs for use in cattle, pigs, and poultry.

“While FDA claims the guidance is to mitigate antibiotic resistance, it allows drug makers to set durations solely based on animal health needs determined by the drug makers,” Steve Roach, the Safe and Healthy Food Program director at Food Animal Concerns Trust, said in a statement. “FDA could have chosen to set a limit consistent with its mission to protect human health as it has in the past, but decided not to.”

As part of a larger plan to encourage the responsible use of medically important antibiotics in agriculture, the FDA has been working for years to push manufacturers to create duration limits for older drugs. But more than a quarter of the drugs still don’t have them.

In 2023, the agency published a draft of the guidance, drawing pushback from public health advocates and members of Congress. The agency received more than 4,500 comments on the proposal, the vast majority of which were from advocates and individuals who “requested that FDA limit all durations of use to no more than 21 days,” according to the FDA.

Comments submitted by industry associations, drug companies, and veterinary organizations included concerns about timelines, clear wording in labeling, and that data used be “of high quality and transparent.”

According to the FDA, “all comments were considered as the guidance was finalized.”

The guidance issued last week includes no suggested timelines. Instead, it gives companies leeway to set both a “typical” and “maximum” duration based on multiple factors related to disease risk and how the drug is being used. The agency asks companies to submit their proposed duration limits along with scientific justification, to be approved for drug labels within the next three years.

It also suggests companies include precautionary statements, such as,“Feed this drug only to the number of animals necessary to treat, control, or prevent the indicated disease in accordance with the approved conditions of use.” None of the recommendations are legally binding. (Link to this post.)

The post FDA Finalizes Controversial Guidelines for Livestock Antibiotics appeared first on Civil Eats.


From Civil Eats via This RSS Feed.

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh that's a relief, the fda is suggesting soul less factory farms that run concentration camps in the most horrific conditions imaginable stop reckless practices. Sure they have persecuted activists showing the conditions there, and are getting them labelled domestic terrorists, and succeeding, once their "investment" in whatever gets lost and ends up in that anonymous account overseas controlled by the president, they probably will be labelled as such in an eo/directive.

States already have ag gag laws, and made it a crime to show conditions at them. When activists have done so, and taken a handful of sick animals, that would've died, slaughtered without payment because they were sick, they sought to bring decades in prison down on them through their corrupt influence in the federal and state governments. And they put massive resources in tracking down these activists now, despite popular support.
They get acquitted seemingly as much as convicted.

So I'm sure those people will see that the FDA recommending best practices is clearly the proper thing to do and change their reckless ways. /s

This isn't even this administration though, this would've happened under the democrats too, and it's why they lose, refusing to free captured agencies. Not calling out people cheating us, not restoring things to before they were further buggered.