this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
85 points (95.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

67769 readers
91 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall removed https://archive.is/CVRiy

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] railway692@piefed.zip 74 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's not theft. It's copying or copyright infringement.

If it was theft, the owners wouldn't have it anymore.

The words matter because they change your moral intuition about it.

[–] quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

I wouldn't mind learning all this magic, seems interesting

[–] 68silver@beehaw.org 5 points 1 day ago

LibreElec installed on a raspberry pi 4 with a real debrid sub will get you pretty much the same thing for less money.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

The Verge needs to stop making articles like this.

Fucking idiots want to ruin a good thing

.... Or they're trying to?

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The fact that they use the term "stealing" for the act of duplicating makes me feel like they're wrecking. I'd take this entire article with a dose of salt.

Yeah, they're definitely trying to fucking rat and snitch

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, it feels like a “loose lips sink ships” situation… But on the other side of the same coin, there’s no way the TV providers were ignorant of this. They undoubtedly already knew, so it’s not like this article is going to bring anything new to light. If anything, it may put a target on the backs of some of the people who were quoted in the article for litigation, but that’s not going to actually stop the boxes from being sold in the long term.

[–] pinballwizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago

lets be honest though. piracy used to be seen as this super complicated thing hackers did. now that the average grandma has tasted the sweet nectar of free media, nobody is going back. what the State doesn't want you to know is that if enough people stop complying with laws, then they lose the capability to be able to enforce them. eventually- too many people won't respect the laws and regardless of the consequences on paper there will be no consequence in practice. there are too few police officers in the united states- even with over policing and mass incarceration what it is, to be able to enforce this.

The market is just going to have to get realistic and realize that you can't nickle and dime people in the era of mass market, high bandwidth, telecommunications.

Thinking about this...I feel this is more:

"Notice me billion dollar cable. Look I'm tattling, now go bribe a congressman that you're upset and don't forget about us once they pass a law"

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

Way ahead of you here. Stopped watching TV entirely in the early 1990s.

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

you wouldn't download a television

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Dodgy boxes have been a massive thing here, and there's so much fearmongering in the news about how they'll steal your internet, bank details and firstborn child, when they're literally just amazon firesticks with some apks on them.

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i mean it's partially true.. many of those weird android tv boxes have spyware loaded onto them, mostly for botnet/residential proxies and sometimes infostealers.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

I don't doubt that, but these are just firesticks. They're not even rooted.

[–] Asmodeus_Krang 4 points 1 day ago

If I were to deploy one on my network it would certainly be isolated on its own VLAN.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

All the public iptv things for british/irish channels get aggressively taken down by sky (company), so it's probably more sustainable for these to exist this way.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It would be nice if I could know how to use these services without some "box" or "app"

[–] darcmage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

https://iptv.surf/ <- Start here

https://ottiptvprovider.com/search <- Helps find the provider with the channels you're looking for

https://search.streamcheck.pro/ <- Checks the quality of each provider

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago

https://github.com/iptv-org/iptv -- this has a lot of american channels in my experience.

[–] klu9@piefed.social 8 points 2 days ago

The article explains that the key services are tied to the hardware & probably controlled (with an attempt at plausible deniability) by the hardware vendors.

Guess someone now needs to come up with a a way to pirate these pirate services 😁