this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
881 points (91.3% liked)

Gaming

3736 readers
237 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 70 points 2 years ago (2 children)

everyone going on about how gamers can't communicate for shit, meanwhile deep rock galactic players INSTANTLY agree that the compressed gold must be pinged unceasingly until management shouts at you, with no verbal communication whatsoever.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] JayJay@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago

Yes yes, we're rich we're rich. Now get back to work.

[–] Electricorchestra@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Also all gamers immediately Rock and Stone!

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago
[–] TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 50 points 2 years ago (4 children)

In houndreds or public matches I've played in CS over the years, maybe like 10 had teammates who all actually used callouts

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I used to solo-queue almost exclusively. Almost always every teammate communicated. This was like 5+ years ago though, so maybe things have changed. I also frequently initiated the communication and kept things going and didn't get mad at people, so that all helps too. From my experience, be nice and communicate and general the same will be returned, but against this was a while ago.

(I'm assuming CS is Counter Strike, and not like competitive multiplayer Cities Skylines or something.)

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 years ago

(I'm assuming CS is Counter Strike, and not like competitive multiplayer Cities Skylines or something.)

"Natural disaster, meteor from northwest, prepare fire fighters!"

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

100% of them called out that they fucked my mother though.

[–] CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Who hasn't?

[–] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I've been exclusively queueing Office since CS2 dropped and most people know the call outs. Idk what it is about that particular map. (Dust2 is okay too)

[–] fiddlesticks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago

Anyone you meet on office has likely never played a different map and therefore knows everything about it.

Source: am office player

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I could never figure out the built in callouts... Anytime I played with the bots in CS:GO, they would always do callouts and I'm pretty sure they're just baked in, but I have no idea where, or how to use them.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Those are displayed on your minimap. Some of them are used by players, and players will know what you mean anyway, but most position calls by players are different from those. They're also frequently regional, so there can be many calls for a single position. They're pretty much always one or two syllables, and usually there's a few similar ones that appear on many maps. Cat, for example, is any catwalk (the most important one on the map if there are multiple). Heaven/Hell is any raised or lowered area respectively, usually with Hell just below Heaven.

You just have to listen to people and ask if you don't know them, maybe also watch some professional matches as the casters also usually use the most common calls for that language.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

Thanks for the insight. I appreciate it.

[–] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 45 points 2 years ago (2 children)

As someone who has played ranked FPS' since... they existed (sigh), and the number of times I had a male teammate throw a tantrum and then refuse to make callouts is... Probably in the hundreds. From QTF to CS to TF2 to Apex...

During a CAL-im match, Dan? Really, Dan?

[–] quinkin@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, even with friends. Everyone in my discord has had a good sook at the others. "I thought you were with me!" proceed to scatter like cats yet again with everyone 'leading'

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

Everyone is the leader, and zero people are following. Gg everyone.

[–] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

QTF

we got a fossil over here

(I'm too young to have played Quake when multiplayer was a thing ;-; but I do speedrun it)

[–] CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I have fond memories of playing Doom via a null modem cable

[–] ChronosWing@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Quake Multi-player is still alive with the remasters that were released recently.

[–] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I've tried it and I had a lot of fun with it at release, but the queue times for matchmaking got unreal (pun intended) pretty quick. I mainly play Half-Life and Quake Live now but it's not quite the same

(but HL1's multiplayer is the bomb tbh, just a lot of servers are dead)

[–] ChronosWing@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago

Yep, I have very fond memories of HL1 multiplayer, also there were SO many HL1 mods that were just incredibly fun.

[–] poplargrove@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Ah yes, "wife bad", a staple of boomer humor.

[–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 56 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This was more "guys bad. Nuh, uh, girls bad." Everyone getting dunked on in this one.

Maybe it was the communication issues we gained along the way.

[–] sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net 6 points 2 years ago

Huh? But my wi-fi is fine?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 54 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's a response in kind to a equally dumb comment.

The original comment is massively generalist so the response is equally generalist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

i've been in relationships where someone passive-aggressively refuses to communicate (or simply through incompetence doesn't know how, and/or came to believe that I was supposed to already intuitively know their position and condition)

One such relationship recently ended on thankfully good terms.

One such relationship was years ago and never quite got off the ground because I was NOT going to play along with the stupid games.

Several others got up through the initial courtship phases but then disintegrated as I realized that my partner at the time was not going to engage me on an honest basis.

These people are real. They're really out there. And they're either destined to be vaguely miserable forever, or someone is going to have to teach them and make them intensely miserable in the immediacy until they learn - and not many people have the patience or psychological energy to guide someone (who is kicking and screaming objections about how they shouldn't have to change or grow or adapt because they're special and perfect just as they are) through establishing a basic understanding of communication.

[–] LavaPlanet@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

When people are adults, it's their job to learn the things and seek the knowledge and self improve. That thinking that you can save someone, that one will always get you in hot water. You just focus on improving you. And leaving the drift wood behind.

[–] Fallenwout@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The built-in "storm the front" and "go go go" voice buttons is all we needed.

[–] HappyMeatbag@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This is such a classic communication problem. I’d like to hear how to overcome it.

[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Both sides have to talk and just as importantly, be willing to listen. Otherwise you're just spinning your wheels and getting nowhere.

[–] BurningRiver@beehaw.org 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I’ve been with my wife for 18 years, and this is 100% correct. Disagreements are always going to happen, you just have to talk your way through them and be willing to admit when you’re wrong.

[–] Raistwalker@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 years ago

Agree 100%. My wife and I had pretty good communication but issues still came up occasionally. A few years in we made the conscious decision to treat arguments that came up as miscommunications first and make sure we each clearly understood each other before doubling down on it. It was a total game changer and was eye opening how often we might have the unrealistic expectation of wanting the other person to read our mind.

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’m imagining you lost a few at “just have to be willing.”

[–] BurningRiver@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well, my wife has to be willing to admit when she’s wrong. Fortunately for me, I’m never wrong. I thought I was wrong once, but it turns out I was mistaken.

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

I needed that deep laugh.

[–] loobkoob@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

A phrase that's always stuck with me is "it's not me versus you; it's me and you versus the problem".

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That and solution driven language. Instead of going "you aren't doing chore x" it's "I need chore x to be done more frequently, here's what I'm willing to commit to doing for it" and then they share what they are realistically able to deliver, and then you negotiate until some sort of compromise is reached. Of course that requires good faith. But if your relationship can't have that, maybe there shouldn't be a relationship.

What I find weird is I see people who can do this in their office job, but then completely fall to bring the same problem solving to their personal life.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES@lib.lgbt 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This meme is veiled misogyny.

[–] HappyMeatbag@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Both people are being sexist - the person who made this initial statement, and the person who replied. I’m not really helping by calling them sexist, though. The important questions are “why does this stereotype exist? How do I prevent/fix it?”

[–] PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES@lib.lgbt 2 points 2 years ago

The stereotype that boys can't communicate exists because the patriarchy tells boys that women aren't so important as to need to be told their feelings. Both people in this meme are sexist, but their sexism both comes from patriarchy. Both of these people ultimately believe that women are more emotional and men are given to more practical skills, and they both have the same solution, which is for men to show some vulnerability and emotionally grow up. The top comment is correct that boys are perfectly capable of choosing to communicate clearly, they simply are taught not to in real world contexts.

load more comments
view more: next ›