this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
1320 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

83295 readers
3215 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google has criticized the European Union’s intentions to achieve digital sovereignty through open-source software. The company warned that Brussels’ policies aimed at reducing dependence on American tech companies could harm competitiveness. According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Kent Walker, Google’s president of global affairs and chief legal officer, warned of a competitive paradox that Europe is facing. According to the Financial Times, he said that creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement. His remarks came just days after the European Commission concluded a public consultation assessing the transition to open-source software.

Google’s chief legal officer clarified that he is not opposed to digital sovereignty, but recommended making use of the “best technologies in the world.” Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection. Local management or servers located in Europe to store information are among the options.

The EU is preparing a technological sovereignty package aimed at eliminating dependence on third-party software, such as Google’s. After reviewing proposals, it concluded that reliance on external suppliers for critical infrastructure entails economic risks and creates vulnerabilities. The strategy focuses not only on regulation but also on adopting open-source software to achieve digital sovereignty.

According to Google, this change would represent a problem for users. Walker argues that the market moves faster than legislation and warns that regulatory friction will only leave European consumers and businesses behind in what he calls “the most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.” As it did with the DMA and other laws, Google is playing on fear. Kent Walker suggested that this initiative would stifle innovation and deny people access to the “best digital tools.”

The promotion of open-source software aims to break dependence on foreign suppliers, especially during a period of instability caused by the Trump administration. The European Union has highlighted the risks of continuing under this system and proposes that public institutions should have full control over their own technology.

According to a study on the impact of open-source software, the European Commission found that it contributes between €65 billion and €95 billion annually to the European Union’s GDP. The executive body estimates that a 10% increase in contributions to open-source software would generate an additional €100 billion in growth for the bloc’s economy.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unnamed1@feddit.org 12 points 1 month ago

It’s like there are three major political forces in the market: USA, China, Open Source. If we leave the dominant place for another IT world hurt competition? How exactly?

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Oh no, anyways

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

Yes of course it would hurt Google's economic growth. That's one of the good points. Why pay for new features that nobody wants to support a company everybody hates. Better to go FOSS and make the world a better and safer place, and also save your taxpayers a lot of money.

[–] pimpampoom@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

Let’s create open source even harder

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The Europe that can say NO.

This is also the same Europe telling down Microsoft not to force Internet Explorer upon its users.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I criticise Emma Stone's plan not to sleep with me.

[–] Fokeu@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

Shit's straight out of the onion. The jokes write themselves

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 10 points 1 month ago

Christ , they're just outright pretending the US isn't a batshit rogue state that needs to be decoupled

[–] privatepirate@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

Google trying to scare Europe into giving them money and power back in their region 😥 Stfu and let Europe get their individuality and contribute to open source projects which will help Americans like me much more than any amount of money given to Google.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"could harm competitiveness"

Wouldn't it be funny if they took the pool of cash they were dedicating to google, but it in half then distributed the remained to the open source initiatives they were switching to?

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

I think it would increase competitiveness as well.

Google will actually have to innovate if they want to have people buy their products rather than just being the default one and only choice.

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] TomArrr@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I did. Not advisable at work 😞

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] timestatic@feddit.org 9 points 1 month ago

The government should just pay some money to maintainers instead of giving it to corpos. That way everyone wins, instead of just google because the code is in the hand of the public. Also google, please just like, politely, fuck off. We know you guys want in on this, even if we need an out. Everyone knows your worries aren't for public interest but for your own pockets. FOSS actually supports a much more competitive landscape by not locking in users and allowing people to build on each others ideas instead of creating monopolies.

[–] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Google’s chief legal officer clarified that he is not opposed to digital sovereignty, but recommended making use of the “best technologies in the world.”

goog chief legal just being an edgelord while undermining some small things like uhhh... goog being under beck and call of an orange baby.

he didn't really define what's "best technologies" are -- in the world.

we can say COBOL is still alive because it is the "best technology" at what it can do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RhondaSandTits@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

It would be more accurate to call it artificial economic growth.
But, these fuckheads would get laughed out of town if they told the truth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Kent Walker suggested that this initiative would stifle innovation and deny people access to the “best digital tools.”

Perhaps in specific scientific or engineering situations the "best digital tools" may be needed, but isn't that just a tiny fraction of the European userbase? How many office workers need bleeding edge tools to make a quarterly report or send an email?

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 month ago

Plus, the whole point in shifting towards open source platforms (besides tech sovereignty) is boosting the development of open source software.

There's already open source scientific software. If it's not as feature rich as a proprietary one that costs thousands a year for one license, then all the more reason to encourage more contributions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Get fucked, corporate shitpiles.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

How can anyone choosing something else than your product hurt competitiveness? Suck it Google and go back to "overseas" reich.

[–] DigitalDidgeridoo@kbin.earth 8 points 1 month ago

"Wolf criticizes sheep for running away"

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Obviously the ultimate goal is to free themselves from dependance on the US and the Trump admin has shown that this need has become crucial. Establish a non-profit organization with the mandate to maintain, respond to user needs and keep secure the software for the public. This would allow developers to work full time on it and keep it supported for decades. The EU and the org's board can meet every year to discuss what direction they want to go with it.

[–] anguo@piefed.ca 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I actually giggled at this.

load more comments (1 replies)

Dear Google: we wouldn't have to do this if you weren't such a shit company.

Oh, you weren't aware that you're a shit company? You legitimately believe you're a positive force for the world? Well that's your own damn fault.

[–] liking625@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

they are obssesed with growth and staying ultrarich instead of what it is best for everyone.

[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I would rather use a tin-can radio than fascist tech. Fuck you, Google. Reap what you sow. You helped American Nazis get in power and you help them stay in power. You deserve to disappear with them when Trump and his vile losers go to jail.

[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Grow a pair and take it up with the shit gibbon in the whitehouse.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›