this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
699 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

81162 readers
4542 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google has criticized the European Union’s intentions to achieve digital sovereignty through open-source software. The company warned that Brussels’ policies aimed at reducing dependence on American tech companies could harm competitiveness. According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Kent Walker, Google’s president of global affairs and chief legal officer, warned of a competitive paradox that Europe is facing. According to the Financial Times, he said that creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement. His remarks came just days after the European Commission concluded a public consultation assessing the transition to open-source software.

Google’s chief legal officer clarified that he is not opposed to digital sovereignty, but recommended making use of the “best technologies in the world.” Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection. Local management or servers located in Europe to store information are among the options.

The EU is preparing a technological sovereignty package aimed at eliminating dependence on third-party software, such as Google’s. After reviewing proposals, it concluded that reliance on external suppliers for critical infrastructure entails economic risks and creates vulnerabilities. The strategy focuses not only on regulation but also on adopting open-source software to achieve digital sovereignty.

According to Google, this change would represent a problem for users. Walker argues that the market moves faster than legislation and warns that regulatory friction will only leave European consumers and businesses behind in what he calls “the most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.” As it did with the DMA and other laws, Google is playing on fear. Kent Walker suggested that this initiative would stifle innovation and deny people access to the “best digital tools.”

The promotion of open-source software aims to break dependence on foreign suppliers, especially during a period of instability caused by the Trump administration. The European Union has highlighted the risks of continuing under this system and proposes that public institutions should have full control over their own technology.

According to a study on the impact of open-source software, the European Commission found that it contributes between €65 billion and €95 billion annually to the European Union’s GDP. The executive body estimates that a 10% increase in contributions to open-source software would generate an additional €100 billion in growth for the bloc’s economy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 17 points 46 minutes ago* (last edited 31 minutes ago)

the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Wrong.

creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement

Wrong.

Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms

What does he not understand about digital sovereignty?

According to Google, this change would represent a problem for users

No, for Google. Also, wrong.

that the market moves faster than legislation and warns that regulatory friction will only leave European consumers and businesses behind in what he calls “the most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.”

If that's the price to avoid technofaschism... And, again, wrong.

Tl;dr: stop wanking, Walker.

[–] pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip 6 points 29 minutes ago (1 children)

What happened to: "Google ❤️ open source"

[–] mjr 2 points 6 minutes ago

Sacrificed on the profit altar, it would seem.

[–] xeekei@lemmy.zip 3 points 15 minutes ago

Fuck you, Google.

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 16 minutes ago* (last edited 16 minutes ago)

Google literally supports a bunch of open source projects. Wtf are they saying?

[–] PlexSheep 1 points 3 minutes ago

While im very happy about this just like everyone else, I think it will be a struggle to get rid of the Microslop stuff. A lot of organizations would simply cease to exist if Microslop office and their Windows admin stuff would be gone right now.

[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 3 points 33 minutes ago

Grow a pair and take it up with the shit gibbon in the whitehouse.

[–] oyzmo@piefed.social 2 points 21 minutes ago

Google 😂

[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 3 points 45 minutes ago

I would rather use a tin-can radio than fascist tech. Fuck you, Google. Reap what you sow. You helped American Nazis get in power and you help them stay in power. You deserve to disappear with them when Trump and his vile losers go to jail.

[–] 4shtonButcher@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 2 hours ago

We literally removed "don't be evil" from our mission statement, but you can totally trust us, bro.

Google

[–] schema@lemmy.world 59 points 3 hours ago

Thanks for confirming we're on the right track, google.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 30 minutes ago

Oh no!
Anyway...

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 hour ago

Guys, what you need to do to be competetive, to foster competition... is keep using all our products and services.

Setting up a fund to get new people involved, to get some more money to existing software devs who work on comparable products and servicrs that could be expanded and improved?

No no no, thats uh, that's anti-competetive, is what that is.

Mhm.

Yep.

[–] trougnouf@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

They are well aware that US companies placing servers in the EU does nothing for "data sovereignty", they are bound by the Cloud Act so anything the US government demands takes precedence over the GDPR / EU regulations (which are therefore legally impossible to comply with).

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago
[–] shirro@aussie.zone 42 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

All these craptastic US tech companies originally started on internationally developed free and open source software. They hoover up capital and talent then abuse their market power. Fuck them all.

They all run on Linux - Torvalds is a Swedish speaking Finn. Greg KH who maintains stable is German. So many libraries and core system contributions by Germans like Drepper and Poettering. Youtube ran on mysql for years from Finnish Widenius. Google built a lot of stuff with Python - from Dutch Guido van Rossum and c++ from Danish Stroustrup. All of the video and audio sites rely heavily on ffmpeg, orginally from French Fabrice Bellard. Lots of them also using virtualisation stuff which includes qemu, also from Bellard. So much comp sci research from Europe and UK. Chrome and Safari originated with KDE (German) code. Europe did all the heavy lifting while the US took all the profits. I'm not even European but every country has the same experience. They have no idea how they are viewed.

[–] RhondaSandTits@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

It would be more accurate to call it artificial economic growth.
But, these fuckheads would get laughed out of town if they told the truth.

[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 3 points 43 minutes ago

The only economic growth they are referring to is Google's economic growth.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 hours ago

Yes of course it would hurt Google's economic growth. That's one of the good points. Why pay for new features that nobody wants to support a company everybody hates. Better to go FOSS and make the world a better and safer place, and also save your taxpayers a lot of money.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

If nobody in Europe paid for Google products think of the economic benefit to Europe if all that saved cash was then spent by the people on European products and services.

[–] Stiggyman@ani.social 4 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

The last one I am actively paying for is YouTube premium. I don’t think there is a good alternative yet..

Either the alternative has critical features missing

Or they are not loud enough to have people crosspost to it

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 22 minutes ago

Using channel URLs as RSS feeds + yt-dlp means i don't even visit the site (when i do uBlock Origin does wonders on Firefox).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] parson0@startrek.website 19 points 4 hours ago

Google and their big tech buddies made their choice by supporting Trump's regime. I know actions have consequences is a concept that doesn't apply in the US, but elsewhere it does. Deal with it.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 50 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection

No, this is fundamentally impossible. The US has the Cloud Act. As long as that exists, this is a nonstarter.

The US can change their laws to not have a global wiretap and secret backdoor warrant program, then this would be possible.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 hour ago

The US can change their laws to not have a global wiretap and secret backdoor warrant program, then this would be possible.

Even if they did, they can change them right back whenever they want and the thing with data is that, once it's out there somewhere, there's no way of knowing for sure it hasn't been copied and archived.

Not just from recent events but from the Snowden Revelations and the decades of 4-eyes operations even before that, we're well beyond the point of it being possible to trust US-based and US-registered companies with the data of Europeans, and ditto for those of any other of what are now the 7-eyes countries.

[–] Fokeu@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 hours ago

Shit's straight out of the onion. The jokes write themselves

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 41 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

"It's afraid" still image from Starship Troopers

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 4 points 1 hour ago

if late stage capitalism could be represented by just one picture, its truly this brain bug.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 8 points 3 hours ago

Christ , they're just outright pretending the US isn't a batshit rogue state that needs to be decoupled

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

How can anyone choosing something else than your product hurt competitiveness? Suck it Google and go back to "overseas" reich.

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 5 points 3 hours ago

Also EU govts might get crippled by losing out on all that tax revenue. /s

[–] rageagainstmachines@lemmy.world 90 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

"Drug dealer criticizes drug user's plan to quit."

[–] BoJackHorseman@lemmy.world 20 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The British came to China with warships when the Chinese government wanted to ban Opium. So I wouldn't expect anything else from these crapitalists.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

Crapitalists.

Excellent, thank you 😁!

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 4 points 3 hours ago

Wait, nobody in their marketing or pr departments told them this would make them look like massive whinebabies?

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

could stifle innovation

What is there to innovate? It’s just email and cloud storage. It’s not like these governments use Google’s latest AI tools. Google hasn’t done shit to innovate Gmail and Google Drive in the last 15 years. And Google’s Trojan horse called Chrome has actually stifled the internet. Google now has way too much power over browser standards and thus how the web should work.

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

The only thing corporations like Google "innovate" on is wealth extraction.

[–] Mohamad20ZX@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 hours ago

Screw you google for restricting my access to my YouTube channel you absolute clowns

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 hours ago

So it must be good thing then?

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Buddy, she's breaking up with you. Accept it.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 32 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›