this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
1320 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

83295 readers
5343 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google has criticized the European Union’s intentions to achieve digital sovereignty through open-source software. The company warned that Brussels’ policies aimed at reducing dependence on American tech companies could harm competitiveness. According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Kent Walker, Google’s president of global affairs and chief legal officer, warned of a competitive paradox that Europe is facing. According to the Financial Times, he said that creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement. His remarks came just days after the European Commission concluded a public consultation assessing the transition to open-source software.

Google’s chief legal officer clarified that he is not opposed to digital sovereignty, but recommended making use of the “best technologies in the world.” Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection. Local management or servers located in Europe to store information are among the options.

The EU is preparing a technological sovereignty package aimed at eliminating dependence on third-party software, such as Google’s. After reviewing proposals, it concluded that reliance on external suppliers for critical infrastructure entails economic risks and creates vulnerabilities. The strategy focuses not only on regulation but also on adopting open-source software to achieve digital sovereignty.

According to Google, this change would represent a problem for users. Walker argues that the market moves faster than legislation and warns that regulatory friction will only leave European consumers and businesses behind in what he calls “the most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.” As it did with the DMA and other laws, Google is playing on fear. Kent Walker suggested that this initiative would stifle innovation and deny people access to the “best digital tools.”

The promotion of open-source software aims to break dependence on foreign suppliers, especially during a period of instability caused by the Trump administration. The European Union has highlighted the risks of continuing under this system and proposes that public institutions should have full control over their own technology.

According to a study on the impact of open-source software, the European Commission found that it contributes between €65 billion and €95 billion annually to the European Union’s GDP. The executive body estimates that a 10% increase in contributions to open-source software would generate an additional €100 billion in growth for the bloc’s economy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Steve@communick.news 392 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (15 children)

According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Is Google seriously arguing that the money these nations save can't be added to their GDPs?
That's what it sounds like. Or am I confused?

[–] TheLastOfHisName@piefed.social 231 points 1 month ago

Google meant THEIR economic growth.

[–] inari@piefed.zip 167 points 1 month ago

Don't worry, Google is trying to confuse you

[–] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 109 points 1 month ago (2 children)

To an enormous extent are todays data centers, cloud providers, and all the techology the whole world use today based on open source. Without linux, curl, ffmpeg, and so on nothing in todays high tech society would work. Google, as it is today, would not exist if it was for all the open source they leech of.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 month ago

Nah, I think they're saying that their corporate offerings and jobs in a given country would not contribute to GDP, while failing to address that developers and engineers would still be necessary to implement these open source applications, though Google won't get to siphon money out of those economies. It's purposely convoluted, basically Google throwing a temper tantrum.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 248 points 1 month ago (9 children)

The company warned that Brussels’ policies aimed at reducing dependence on American tech companies could harm competitiveness.

Just what I'd expect a monopoly to say.

Fuck you. Alphabet.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 31 points 1 month ago

They mean it would harm their competitiveness.

As in, "We'd be less competitive if you switch to a competitor" (in this case FOSS).

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Decq@lemmy.world 138 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When companies like Google, Microsoft, etc. are starting to squirm and whimper. You know you are on the right path. So I take this as a sign that the EU is heading in the right direction.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rageagainstmachines@lemmy.world 128 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Drug dealer criticizes drug user's plan to quit."

[–] Lembot_0006@programming.dev 123 points 1 month ago (40 children)

Of course Google hates open-source. They can't compete with it. Same shit with Microsoft: people are just afraid of trying Linux, but those who do, rarely look back at Windows.

load more comments (40 replies)
[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 95 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  1. Shift over to open source.
  2. Invest 25--50% of what you currently pay for proprietary software into helping maintain and enhance open source software.
  3. Enjoy the economic benefits well maintained free software brings to every aspect of your digital infrastructure at no extra cost.
[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 55 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Open source will innovate so much faster if properly funded, without the shackles of copyright and companies holding advancements secret and not releasing innovations on purpose as long as they hold on edge on "competition". Competition is only important because of proprietary capitalism, remove capitalism and directly reward the workers and innovation happens for innovation's sake.

Can't wait for this to be proven in practice, and to be able to apply that more widely to society. Godspeed Europe

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 92 points 1 month ago (1 children)

MoRe OpTiOnS iS bAd FoR cOmPeTiTiOn

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

competition is bad for competition

checks out

translation: having more competitors harms our chance of winning against them

[–] schema@lemmy.world 84 points 1 month ago

Thanks for confirming we're on the right track, google.

[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 81 points 1 month ago (4 children)

You guys don’t see what they’re scared shitless about? It’s the fear of an EU-based true open source Android fork/competitor.

Also when they say FOSS will not contribute to “economic growth”, they mean Alphabet’s. Greedy pigs.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 73 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Wrong.

creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement

Wrong.

Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms

What does he not understand about digital sovereignty?

According to Google, this change would represent a problem for users

No, for Google. Also, wrong.

that the market moves faster than legislation and warns, that regulatory friction will only leave European consumers and businesses behind in what he calls “the most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.”

If that's the price to avoid technofaschism... And, again, wrong.

Tl;dr: stop wanking, Walker.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 72 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Funny considering how much of Google was built on open software.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 70 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Remember, whenever you see a patently weak argument like this from a trillion dollar corporation, they’re not saying it because they think anyone will believe it. They’re saying it to give the corrupt politicians in their pocket some way to pull a straight face when voting in the corporation’s favour.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xeekei@lemmy.zip 65 points 1 month ago

Fuck you, Google.

[–] TerdFerguson@lemmy.world 62 points 1 month ago

The leopard of consequences is hungry for tech oligarch faces.

Eat, you majestic creature. And godspeed.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 62 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection

No, this is fundamentally impossible. The US has the Cloud Act. As long as that exists, this is a nonstarter.

The US can change their laws to not have a global wiretap and secret backdoor warrant program, then this would be possible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shirro@aussie.zone 60 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

All these craptastic US tech companies originally started on internationally developed free and open source software. They hoover up capital and talent then abuse their market power. Fuck them all.

They all run on Linux - Torvalds is a Swedish speaking Finn. Greg KH who maintains stable is German. So many libraries and core system contributions by Germans like Drepper and Poettering. Youtube ran on mysql for years from Finnish Widenius. Google built a lot of stuff with Python - from Dutch Guido van Rossum and c++ from Danish Stroustrup. All of the video and audio sites rely heavily on ffmpeg, orginally from French Fabrice Bellard. Lots of them also using virtualisation stuff which includes qemu, also from Bellard. So much comp sci research from Europe and UK. Chrome and Safari originated with KDE (German) code. Europe did all the heavy lifting while the US took all the profits. I'm not even European but every country has the same experience. They have no idea how they are viewed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 59 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm not sure why anyone in EU, bloc or therefore canada should even care what an American company opinion would be at this point. They said they were moving on. They did.

[–] 4shtonButcher@discuss.tchncs.de 54 points 1 month ago

We literally removed "don't be evil" from our mission statement, but you can totally trust us, bro.

Google

[–] madjo@piefed.social 53 points 1 month ago

Kiss my European ass, Google.

[–] abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone 51 points 1 month ago

Car company complains that city is developing Metro system.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 45 points 1 month ago (7 children)

If nobody in Europe paid for Google products think of the economic benefit to Europe if all that saved cash was then spent by the people on European products and services.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Google criticizes

Fuck you and shut the fuck up. Google has zero right to say anything, let alone criticize anything.

Do no evil, remember? I remember.

Fuck you

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] C1pher@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 1 month ago

More desperate pleas by Google. I just saw an article by some Google shill that made a case against self hosting. Next they'll try to make it illegal.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"It's afraid" still image from Starship Troopers

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aqua@lemmy.zip 41 points 1 month ago

really fun fuck you google

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not surprised that they are against it but very surprised that they so blatantly expose their reasoning. If you don't buy my product, it's not good for me, therefore it is not a good idea 🤷

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 month ago
[–] skvlp@lemmy.wtf 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection. Local management or servers located in Europe to store information are among the options.

As long as they’re a US company US law can force them to hand over data. No matter where the servers are located.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 01189998819991197253 38 points 1 month ago

Not good for whose growth? Because it'll be perfectly fine for eu. The fact that google is upset about this, should be all the tell you need to know you're on the right path.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tough shit, you supported the MAGA movement and Europe, thankfully, reacted accordingly. Simply put, the good folks in the EU lost faith in the USA.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sonofearth@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Aaahh it hurts our business…. please don’t…. we can’t collect data now aaahhhh…. open source = communism = economic losss aahhhhhh…. why are you being anti competitive grrrrrrrr….

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip 35 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What happened to: "Google ❤️ open source"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 34 points 1 month ago

How DARE they try to ELIMINATE our Services after ALL the MONEY we Poured in Donald Trump's POCKETS!

[–] notso@feddit.org 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Drug dealer critizises addict's intention to get clean.

[–] WhisperingEye@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago

Oh no! Big evil company doesn't like Europe is realizing they need alternatives? Shocker!

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bullerfar@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago

I don't think google is the right source talking competitiveness on this matter..

[–] Concur6053@lemmy.today 31 points 1 month ago

Probably the most resounding endorsement they could hope for

[–] rfr_Foglia@feddit.it 31 points 1 month ago

It means we're doing something right.

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 28 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is sign that Google is worried that a market of 500 million people could decide to move away from the US tech giants. Very worried, judging by this flimsy fear-driven argument. Good.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›