this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
409 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

81118 readers
3546 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] timestatic@feddit.org 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Why can't they build a mechanism where the car can close its own doors. I thought that would be the smaller part compared to autonomous self driving

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

The gig worker is the mechanism. Very innovative tech.

I know I can shut a passenger side car door with just the accelerator and brakes. If it's not latched completely then a bollard or a curbside tree will suffice.

[–] macke49@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Human driven taxis have mechanically closing passenger doors for decades. It's a big bug software and a management a failure . This can't be street legal. Autonomous cabs are billionaires snake oil

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 hours ago

Hell, the Mexican colectivo van driver closes the sliding doors on his rattly 20 year old van simply by hard braking.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 29 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Give people a dollar discount off their ride if they close the door on the way out.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 14 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Why are people leaving the doors open in the first place that's just wild. The super excited to get to work or something I don't get it.

Wouldn't the simplest solution be to just ban people who leave the doors open, it's not that hard to close them.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago

Probably the doors are in the "unlatched" position rather than wide open.

[–] scottrepreneur@lemmy.world 22 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

But charge an extra dollar first

[–] cdf12345@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 hours ago

have a friend stalk Waymo’s and give the passenger $5 to leave the door ajar a bit .

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 131 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Clearly that's why it's called DoorDash. /s

[–] siravious@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Take my upvote and gtfo 😂

[–] DannyMac@sh.itjust.works 63 points 1 day ago (10 children)

They have self-driving cars, but self-closing doors is still at least 10-15 years away.

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 156 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Putting aside all the late stage capitalism going on here, I still can't get over the fact that Alphabet (Google) spent billions of dollars developing self driving car technology only to arrive at, "Oh shit. Someone left the car door open. What do we do now?"

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 95 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Giving them the ability to close their own doors just screams "kid's arm smashed in automatic car door failure".

[–] timestatic@feddit.org 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Just make the motor not slam the door but close it slowly with not enough force to harm someone and put like two sensors + 1 backup in there

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Call me a cynical luddite but somehow I don't trust today's autonomous car technology to be reliable and fool-proof enough for that mechanism not to fail catastrophically and randomly because it's raining or someone on the other side of the street made a sudden movement or Mercury is in retrograde or the company's stock market just dropped 592 points because investors are furious after realising they wasted money on a backup or it's Tuesday.

[–] timestatic@feddit.org 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You know we already have autonomous doors for houses. I feel like theres a lot more trust involved having a 2 ton vehicle move significant speeds on the road than having it close a door

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 0 points 6 hours ago

I do not know that. I'd also assume the technology to close a door on a car to work very differently from that on a house because a door on a house that may not be closed properly is far less dangerous than one on a car. Also, yes, I don't trust that 2 ton vehicle either if it claims to be autonomous.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

But they built in a saw blade killswitch if a finger is detected a good decade ago or more. Surely they can apply such technology to cars.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

It hasn't yet been used without people around who can stop the process if it goes wrong.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

The sawstop causes mechanical damage that must be repaired if activated. It's more like an airbag than an e-stop.

Perfect argument that they are too immature to be on the road.

[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 9 points 21 hours ago

Behold the miracle of the slipping clutch, millenials. See It working without being digital and all without an app by the ancient secrets of mechanics!

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I used to have a Tesla (traded it in). In the app you could open, but not close, the windows. It could be inconvenient at times but I assume the reasoning was similar.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

New cars have automatic window up functions but strictly dont apply enough pressure to choke a child

[–] flynnguy@programming.dev 17 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Mine goes up automatically and if it encounters resistance, it goes back down again. I guess this is too hard for Tesla.

[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

IIRC people were testing cybertrucks for some auto-closing functionality, and if they encountered resistance, they would back off... Then try harder, slicing through hotdogs

[–] evulhotdog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

I saw carrots being sheared like nothing from the cybertruck.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

Still hurts like hell though... from someone who once accidentally rolled up the window BEFORE pulling my head in. :-D

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

This shows you just how strong our culture is an influence here. You can leave a door open and cause enough trouble that they need to hire someone else to go manually shut it. I’m willing to bet there are a lot of seemingly innocuous ways to cause friction with these companies. The more people know and exploit them, the better.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

the revolution IS YOU

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 101 points 1 day ago

Does it charge extra to the last person that used the Waymo to cover the cost? Because if not, might as well just leave the door open every time, now you're a job creator.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

so from now on leave all waymo's doors open and if you see one open no you don't

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] skip0110@lemmy.zip 54 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Hmmm…so it costs Waymo $11.25 if you “forget” to shut the door.

Maybe people will become very forgetful.

Or, upon reflection, just don’t use Waymo, and don’t play into it at all.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 26 points 1 day ago (4 children)

If you leave it all the way open, the car just needs to drive a couple feet with decent acceleration to close it.

If you ALMOST close it, but not all the way, that would require some sort of intervention.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] itsathursday@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago

The cost of doing business is to pay a poor to close a door and keep the wheels of progress spinning.

load more comments
view more: next ›