this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
1129 points (95.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

29741 readers
1146 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Public domain ≠ FOSS

[–] Fontasia@feddit.nl 32 points 1 day ago

Stallman: "Oh man, not like this."

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is Windows FOSS now?

Ew, no, thank you, I don't want it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I had a similar thought. If LLMs and image models do not violate copyright, they could be used to copyright-wash everything.

Just train a model on source code of the company you work for or the copyright protected material you have access to, release that model publicly and then let a friend use it to reproduce the secret, copyright protected work.

[–] pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

btw this is happening actuallt AI trained on copyrighted material and it's repeating similar or sometimes verbatim copies but license-free :D

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WiseFirefighter7299@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

windows would be OSS, not FOSS.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] akmur@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

how can you tell if it's AI generated? you can't

[–] Zink@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The same way you tell if it's copy & pasted from Stackoverflow or some other search result!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 40 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Anything built by AI/LLMs should be FOSS by law. Oh I dream of the day.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago

Not FOSS, just public domain.

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 18 points 1 day ago

Your wish is granted.

But you can only view the source code through an LLM

a finger on the monkey paw curls

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's terrible news. There's no way I want my code to be open source. Then other people would see just how much spaghetti you can have in a codebase and still have it run.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh darn, our CEO told us to use LLMs to write all this code, and now the good parts might be used for something that helps people. Not our copyrights!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Alberat@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

windows engineers have probably been copying snippets from stackoverflow for decades, which may have been copied from the kernel or some other copyleft product

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Windows is not even source-available. Windows XP is source-unintentionally-available thanks to a leak but there's no AI loophole in that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago

There's still copyrighted code in windows, so no this is bullshit.

Code contains a lot of elements that are not copyrightable (elementary maths etc), that does not prevent the overall program from being copyrighted.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›