as we all know that means they are actively doing it.
news
A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.
Rules:
- Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
- Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
- Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
- Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
- No link shorteners
- No entire article in the post body
He suggests it was an oversight...it's irony since he wouldn't understand double entendre:
“I don’t think it’s appropriate for anybody to be tracking that,” Johnson told reporters. “So I will echo that to anybody involved with DOJ, and I’m sure it was an oversight. That’s my guess.”
Quote is from politico article.
I'm just wondering what the fuck they hoped to leverage this shit for.
like, this took time and effort and an intention to break laws - who the fuck thought the payoff would be worth it, and what did it get them? aside from caught in the act?
Mike Johnson? That doesn't seem likely.
It was a warning. Not like they'll do anything about it
Just waiting for Red Scare 2.
3*
Dialectic Boogaloo
How bout we bring back the 4th amendment for the people of the united states too?
Have Capitol Police detain them in a 'secure hidden location'. Like a 55 gallon drum that's been welded shut and covered in concrete.
I'm not fucking joking. Just do it, then say you don't have records of what happened to them, or that you can't divulge the location for national security purposes. Anyone that comes to investigate, do the same to them, until the point is observed. If you step into the capitol to lie to Congress, you don't fucking leave. No matter what your title, or net worth.
So is she assuming the role of J. Edgar Hoover because Patel is even more incompetent than her?