this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
1178 points (99.4% liked)

Political Memes

11057 readers
2694 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Decq@lemmy.world 201 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

The fact it's still at 29% is mind boggling to me. How delusional or racist/pedophilical do you have to be to approve of this guy?

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 80 points 2 days ago (2 children)

there are a LOT of severely uneducated inbred racist bigots in this country. pretty much anywhere in the south, or any isolated rural area anywhere--that's what it is

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My incredibly racist late grandmother asked me in 2020 if I was voting for "the other guy."

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"no, i'm voting for trump because he's going to obliterate your medicare"

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago

Don't worry. Her husband died in like 1985, and she lived off his government pension for 35 years.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Not "anywhere in the south" and no I'm not just talking about the cities. One of the blue-est parts of Georgia is the poorest and most rural. Not as blue as Atlanta of course, but still blue

I recommend traveling to the south before making sweeping generalizations. Some of the most extreme views I've encountered in the South I've found in states like Pennsylvania and parts of upstate New York too.

This isn't a geography issue. It's an education and culture issue

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Based on my interactions, I think the delusional/pedophilic demographic is far outweighed by those who are simply deeply ignorant (no comment on racism).

It's not that they're ignoring the evidence about him, or even support him in spite of it (though that definitely happens too). They live in a bubble where they just never see any negative news about him. Their news sources either ignore those stories entirely, or spin them beyond all recognition. Whenever something negative gets too big, they're told it's fake news, or that the Democrats are doing it even worse.

[–] Hazor@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

This. They're told, e.g., that the Epstein stuff is all a smear campaign by Democrats. And they believe it because it's hammered into them and because of tribalism.

If my father believed Trump was involved with Epstein and the raping of children, he'd never have voted for Trump. But instead he's convinced that Trump is God-appointed to save America from those evil Democrats who want to corrupt kids with trans ideology. He's stuck in an algorithmically-secured propaganda bubble.

[–] MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My in-laws are these kind of people. They voted for a lot of politicians, local and federal, because their church told them to because these politicians didn't support abortion. That's all they needed, no other policy or information required. If they questioned it they'd get ostracized from their church circle, so why bother.

If we chatted about these politicians. Typically they were not aware of the deeper topics and would genuinely be disturbed by them, but their responses always went back to, well I just can't vote for X they are pro-abortion and the church doesn't support that.

They need someone to tell them what to do and they cling to these groups because they have never been self sufficient.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You just described basically my mom's entire family.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Nothing like an imaginary problem/thought exercise used to manipulate voters. Think of the unborn babies! Of course, ignore all the actual living babies. God these people are so fucking stupid.

I was reading last night about the reversal of the EPA ruling on C02. They were using propaganda like the "religion of climate change".

That got my wheels spinning! Wait a minute. If it is a "religion" then don't you have to respect it!?

Truth is that could give a shit about your Magical Sky Daddy beliefs, they only care if it serves their purpose.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's mind boggling to me for a different reason, he has always had his cult locked in where he never dropped below 30something% no matter what he did. The fact that he actually lost some of the die hard "I'd forgive him for raping my daughter" croud is kinda wild.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

A lot of that crowd is elderly. Even if none of them change their opinion, he's still going to be losing them over time.

My grandma voted for Trump in 2024 ... by mail, from her hospice bed.

Hopefully, she won't be voting in 2026 or 2028. (Though I wouldn't put it past my family to cast another mail-in ballot for her 'because it's what she would have wanted'.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Even post-Watergate Nixon had 25%. I think no matter what he does it isn't going to drop below that, there's a subset of the population that simply won't adjust their opinion on of him.

Keep in mind a lot of people simply aren't paying attention and a lot of people have made MAGA a core part of their personality; to turn on it now would mean admitting that all their social media posts, financial contributions, merch, and ruined relationships were in vain. It's massively humiliating to admit to yourself and others that you were that overconfidantly wrong to hitch your wagon to a known conman rapist.

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I've found that in every US political poll, the absolute worst of the worst topic or candidate will almost always have 25-30% support. I really think a quarter of people are complete assholes who lack empathy and care for no one but themselves.

[–] Tower@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 20 points 2 days ago

29% is insanely low considering how much propaganda they spew and how much media they control.

I try to be "optimistic" because Trump is only going to make things worse, so even lower numbers are possible.

Even Truman was barely lower than this, though his were low because dipshit Americans fellated MacArthur who was a Trump-like figure in many ways. Fake bravado (he abandoned his troops in the Philippines when things got tough), shit talker who spewed bloodthirsty talking points (he wanted to drop 50 nukes on China during the Korean War), but wore cool shades and smoked a pipe, etc

Maga simply represents the shallow, indulgent narcissism at the root of American identity, especially in the shithole South. We've been like this for a long fucking time.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If I told you the population was 29% raving morons, you wouldn’t be surprised, would you?

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 1 points 18 hours ago

Sounds a bit low, honestly.

Though, to be fair, even a lot of raving morons don't support Trump.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] troybot@piefed.social 150 points 2 days ago (4 children)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 49 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Or firing the jobs agency statistician because the numbers were so bad...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

And our whole governmental apparatus is dedicated to propping up a brain-dead, geriatric asshole's ego so people in power can steal more from us with zero accountability.

Which would be bad, but it gets worse, because propping up brain-dead geriatrics is a bipartisan effort now.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Don't forget, "Stop counting the votes".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's too small to measure, just like his...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kurmudgeon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Just another company gargling Trump's mushroom-shaped member. America is so fucking embarrassing. Now I know how Russians feel.

[–] Korne127@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's genuinely insane how many people here really think it fell to 29%…

Gallup's last poll had it at 36%, and compared to prior and other surveys, that's already rather an outlier:

(And yes, I know Nate Silver isn't great, but that doesn't mean that the data is collected and accumulated in a good way.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So who owns Gallup, that’s making them do this?

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Gallup is an employee-owned corporation. i'm not sure where the funding for their presidential approval polling comes from

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

employee-owned

is such a euphemism, in my opinion. Law firms are often "employee-owned".

It has internal shareholders, they're not a co-op, and should be viewed like any other for profit business.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Totally. That's way I tried to make sure to say corporation

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, no issue with how you've used it. I'm just publically grumbling about the term's existence haha

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 2 points 20 hours ago

nah yeah totally got that. just wanted to make sure anyone coming accross this knew to recognize it in the future as not being the same. i realized with your comment that a little bit of my intention was lost

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago

Me either, but I'm sure that famously litigious Trump didn't threaten to sue them if they continued posting bad numbers like he's threatened anyone who hurt his feelings.

[–] mkhopper@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

They want to stop measuring now so they can have time to rework some of their code.

No one ever thought they might need to use single digit numbers.

[–] neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I remember when dubya was in charge it was a global meme how stupid he was. I heard some clip of a speech he made a while back and god damn did he sound coherent and respectable compared to what we have today.

The bar has lowered so much its unbelievable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

American unity was very, very high after 9/11.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Kind of refreshing to see Trump is the only president to never have a positive approval rating.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deliciEsteva@piefed.world 12 points 1 day ago

He broke the scale and they can't afford a new one because of tariffs.

I am not saying its not politically related but its worth adding the context they provided: "Gallup said the ratings are now "widely produced, aggregated and interpreted, and no longer represent an area where Gallup can make its most distinctive contribution."

Generally gallup has good methodology so I am not sure their reason is sound but im also not fully sure its because of Trump

[–] laz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 days ago

It is sort of respectable, they did not fix the numbers instead.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 27 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Not that I've seen. On some issues, he's down a lot, but overall has him in the 37-42 range. Which is about 50 too high

There's a solid core that will never abandon him, and a squishy shell that could, but only consumes right wing propaganda

[–] Duranie@leminal.space 22 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Working in hospice, I regularly come across patients/family members who actively seem to avoid anything that could potentially challenge their beliefs.

Step one, vote orange because R. Step two, remove anyone or anything from your life that makes you uncomfortable or requires reflection. Step three, exist comfortably with your head in the sand while the rest of the world burns.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] karashta@piefed.social 21 points 2 days ago (9 children)

He doesn't think he's leaving office, so why would he need an approval rating?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

With a mortar launcher

load more comments
view more: next ›