this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
241 points (98.4% liked)

politics

28220 readers
2870 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Congressional Democratic leaders are asking ICE to agree to reforms, promising to vote for $11 billion in funding for the agency if it does so. ICE has every reason to concede to the demands — then ignore them once the funding bill passes.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

spending bills for 2026 — Pentagon ($839 billion); Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education ($195 billion)

One of those should be receiving wayy more money than the other, and it's backwards

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It starts locally. Show up for local elections. Show up for state elections. Don’t let these people make it to the federal level.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

And when they do make it to the federal level, remember that they want us dead and aren't even remotely close to being on our side.

[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fuck that noise. I’m visiting D.C. from the PNW, I am most definitely meeting with my elected representatives and demanding a moment of FaceTime. I will be traveling a very long way and by golly, you bet yer sweet bippy I will have a thing or two to carry on about. This is democracy in action. That is my plan, I’ve made arrangements. Will get back to you all as soon as this happens. I travel there in 60 days.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Good luck. DC is under military occupation

[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

Not deterred in the slightest.

[–] Auk@lemmy.world 52 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Perhaps NY’s 8th will vote this spineless, compromised shill out of office in November.

[–] WHARRGARBL@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hakeem Jeffries is up for reelection this November. Currently, he has only one June 23 primary challenger, Vance Bostic. This honestly looks like Jeffries will win in a landslide.

Schumer will continue to mutter his goddam inanities for years, as he isn’t up for reelection until November 2028.

[–] myserverisdown@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

There's certainly a few people that would hope a bullet helps expedite that election if they vote to hand over ICE funding just like the previous shutdown.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 days ago

The Democrats need entirely new leadership if they ever want to be taken seriously as a party again. This is just a disgrace...

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Dem leaders yet again drop the ball that was handed to them on a silver platter.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

They work for the same people. The game is rigged

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 28 points 2 days ago

If not controlled opposition, why controlled opposition shaped?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 8 points 2 days ago

It's long past time for the MAGA comedy act of Schmuck & Jeffries to get the hook, and be dragged off stage.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Here's what I want Republicans and Democrats to explain - make it make sense how ICE needs all this funding. How did they possibly get by before?

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They need funding to build more genocide sites

[–] gnuthing@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Incinerators must be expensive

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

German Engineering ain't cheap

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

Trump gotta get his beak wet.

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They're not useless! Just for democracy. And people. But not for Trump, they're really useful for Trump!

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 15 points 3 days ago

"Why is it always these 2?"

Yes, I know they are the party leadershit.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Neoliberals only have a problem with authoritarianism when they're not in control.

They don't want to destroy the ring like Gandalf, they want to hide in a hole like Smeagol until they learn to use it.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 days ago

If there was an award for understatement, you’d deserve one.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Harkeem and Schumer. Who else. ?

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Honestly I’m on the fence about yanking the DHS funding. Trump is just going to fund ICE through other piles of money that he got in the BBB and that he’ll just start cutting other more critical services. Like FEMA, which is under the DHS.

If the Dems can effectively communicate that Trump is using FEMA, TSA, and coastguard money for ICE, then they should cut funding. But I’m not particularly confident about the Dems ability to communicate this. Hell, a lot of people don’t even realize that Trump can still fund ICE if Dems holdback DHS funding. They have not effectively communicated this.

[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 4 points 2 days ago

Trump is just going to fund ICE through other piles of money that he got in the BBB and that he’ll just start cutting other more critical services

Worse - ICE are already fully funded until 2029. As in, they have already been given $75b to spend over the next 3 years. Cut their funding to zero tomorrow and it has zero effect on them until after the next election.

[–] Binturong@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

You act like this is a dialogue, like the tRump republicans are there, in good faith, listening. Catch up, there can be no compromise cause they're not looking for it, all the Dems can do is obstruct by any means possible, even if they have to get creative, because any other action will simply be capitulation to the demands of the administration. That is if they're actually committed to democracy and the welfare of the American public, and not their donors' outcomes. Which I personally think you have to be deluded to think, at least in regard to the party leadership, who consistently makes the exact wrong move every time (for Americans, that is).