this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
185 points (67.4% liked)

/0 Governance

343 readers
51 users here now

A community for discussion and democratic decision making in the Divisions by zero.

Anyone with voting rights can open a governance thread and initiate a vote or a discussion. There's no special keywords you must be aware of before you open a thread, but there are some. here's the governance thread manual.

Answers

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ahoy mateys!

A few of our users have recently pointed out that a lot of the pro-Zionist accounts on the fediverse nowadays seem to come from the feddit.org instance.

Feddit.org's explanation for this situation seems to fit into a few common variations:

  • They accept both pro- and anti-Zionist members, so it's not proof of a bias.
  • They [choose to] comply [in advance] with strict German / Swiss / Austrian laws regarding [overly broad] "antisemitic" language, or they might get in trouble.
  • Calling for the destruction of Israel must obviously mean you want to kill every last man, woman and child, rather than simply wanting to overthrow Netanyahu's genocidal fascist regime. Because [bad faith] reasons.
  • Lots of Euros (and Germans specifically) are pro-Zionist, so they feel like they have to accommodate this view.

But whatever the excuse happens to be, they need to do better imo. Israel is currently the most violent, fascist and genocidal nation state in the Middle East (if you exclude the US military bases there). And yet feddit.org seems to regard the Palestinians fighting against Israel's ongoing illegal occupation of their land as the real terrorists. As such, I am calling for feddit.org to:

  • Explicitly prohibit pro-Zionist accounts from joining.
  • Take measures to resolve their claimed legal issues, e.g., moving their server location to a less regulated jurisdiction, and ensuring that admin accounts remain anonymous regarding their location.
  • Stop referring to folks who call for "Death to Israel" or similar as though they are the terrorists or violent extremists. The Zionist Israeli settlers, the murderous IDF rapists, and the entirety of the Israeli government are clearly the violent ethnostate extremists we should be worried about, not the Palestinians in Gaza who are fighting for their lives every single day against completely disproportionate levels of Zionist violence.

More context

Our instance already voted to ban pro-Zionist accounts (see https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/60585441 for reference) and the rule that was implemented is here: Golden Rule #8.

As further context, you can find relevant comments and discussion in this post by a banned feddit admin in MoG (that fact they chose to post in MoG is in itself quite telling), and this post about their defederation from quokk.au over anti-semitism allegations has recently become active again.

I've also pulled out some choice morsels from the modlog to illustrate the sort of thing we are talking about:

This one says it all... mrdown@lemmy.world being banned for calling out feddit.org users for being Zionist apologists. It's apparently "xenophobic" to state a few hard truths.

If you have had similar experiences on feddit.org, please feel free to share in the comments.

Voting instructions

I am proposing to ban the following communities from feddit.org, which seem to be the most problematic communities in terms of hosting pro-Zionist posts/comments:

Upvote this post if you want dbzer0 / anarchist nexus to ban these communities.

Downvote this post if you'd prefer not to ban these communities.

Note 1: Votes from external instances do not count, unless one of our admins has vouched for you.

Note 2: If you think feddit.org deserves a full instance ban instead, or have alternative suggestions, then please leave your comments below. If enough people think that's the better option, then we'll do that instead.

Note 3: Although I don't really expect this to happen, if feddit.org agrees to make policy changes to address these issues then we are willing to reassess the situation.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I would be opposed to full-defederation, since there is still a lot of good users on feddit. I think removing those communities is a good middle ground.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 23 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I am not a member of your server, but I think it's amongst the top 4 best servers on the threadiverse. I have a great deal of respect for your server and the communities that have come to be on it. I would advise that when dealing with a -----bar on the fediverse, be that a nazi-bar, a zionist-bar, or any other kind of authoritarian-bar, the smaller concern isn't if there's things on it your users will miss (with the threadiverse, those things are communities) and the bigger concern is how the problem figures that have coagulated in that bar act and behave when they engage with the things originating on your server. I commend the desire to do this gracefully, but if you're going to limit yourselves to blocking communities (which will ultimately limit your own users more than feddit.org's users, though I'm not sure your users will be bothered or that their users will notice), I think you ABSOLUTELY MUST plan a period of time to revisit this. I'd probably say 1 month. If next month you feel that what you're seeing on your server is improved in the way you want it to, then leave it be, and if not then de-federate.

Otherwise, I would recommend immediate defederation if this is a recurring problem. These fediverse servers all act as garden parties. Blocking communities at other garden parties is less effective at combating bad behavior than not letting people through the gate in your garden. If this path is followed, I'd recommend maintaining channels of communication between the admins of both instances for 6 months to see if and how things change.

Again. I am not a member here. More of an outside observer with a ton of respect with a little bit of input after years of being in online spaces and having very little tolerance for bad faith behavior. You can take or reject these observations depending on how you align with them. Hell, I may even be full of shit. But one of us leftists' greatest weaknesses and greatest strength is our tolerance. The strength is in that it helps us build coalitions and confront our own biases. The weakness is that bad faith actors exploit this to string us along and keep making our spaces worse on purpose, so I tend to support a relatively strict federation/defederation policy and to let users find the admin teams that align best to their own desired defederation policy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I agree that these communities should be blocked, however I am much more in favor of defederating Feddit as a whole and not just banning these communities. This is because it is Feddit as a platform who enables this behavior, and who ultimately is suppressing anti-Zionist and antifascist voices, while making bad faith arguments to defend Zionism. Including threatening and ultimately defederating other instances for calling them out on it as well as their admins coming here to apologize for Zionism.

The problems with Feddit run much deeper than a few communities being run by Zionist apologists. They run as deep as the management of the site itself. So blocking these communities isn't enough. I believe more will spring up in the future, not necessarily to replace them but because their userbase is predominantly Zionists or Zionist apologists.

They are bad news, we don't need them, and they clearly don't want us. Their admin agreeing with a known Zionist troll and implying we wish to cause harm to Israeli citizens just further proves this:

Feddit is bad news, more than just a few communities there, if they don't do serious work to change we shouldn't be connected with them. If anyone here really wants to be a part of Feddit that badly, you can make an account there or a server that federates with it, likewise with any feddit user who wishes to be on dbzer0.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rivvvver@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 days ago (4 children)

id rather get into arguments with zionists than stick my head in the sand and hope they change on their own.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Personally, the problem is the use of the tools of authority in those communities (moderation powers) and server (administration powers) to de facto suppress any criticism of a modern day ethno-Fascist ideology second only to Nazism in the depravity of the Violent Racism it spreads and the nation that follows it and has, inspired by it, has engaged in a Genocide along ethnic lines whose level of state-sanction depravation (for example, the active targetting children for murder in Gaza and widespread use of rape against political prisioners) are second only to the Holocaust itself in the treatment of actual human beings of the races they deem "vermin" as subhuman.

I for one would be perfectly fine with the "arguments" stage, my problem is that in feddit they have systematically leveraged the natural control powers of communities and servers in this system into a form of ideological authoritarism, worse, one in the service of a depraved ideology and the nation that follows such depraved ideals.

The active support through the use of the authority-tools of moderation and administration in that server for zionists and suppression of points of view critical to the zionists and their ideals means that this discussion here is not about "arguments" but rather it's about "abuse of authority" and in the latter domain it's logical to respond with tools in the same domain, namelly banning and defederation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I respect that sentiment but the problem is that these communities actively suppress dissent while not suppressing Zionists. So the end result is that it means Zionists can argue with you, and they'll ban you if you argue back so you can't argue with them. Ultimately the result isn't much different than if we ban them but the benefit is that they can't argue with us.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 23 points 3 days ago (3 children)

They say they are just complying with German, Austrian, and Swiss laws. If criticising Israel is illegal under said laws, I'd rather just shut down feddit.org entirely than comply. If it were me.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Shore up the yardarms, me hearties. We need to rid ourselves of a few fascists.

If feddit.org is harboring these ass-bags, then they're part of the problem. The issue I see with only banning the communities from showing here is that the users within those communities don't likely know they've been censured.

Playing devil's advocate for my own stance, I should say that the "right" thing to do would be to give them enough rope to hang themselves from the yardarm themselves. In other words, if they're feddit.org user and start spouting Zionist shit on db0, then they're probably someone that should be outright disallowed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nomad 17 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Unsure if I'm allowed to participate here, so delete please if inappropriate.

I have always been of the impression that banning single accounts reactively to what they post is more work but also more impactful in terms of teaching people to view a problematic world view with the required precision in choosing to express their views.

On the one hand a blanket ban decreases engagement and encourages radicalization through isolation.

On the other hand would engaging with them allow people to see what precisely is a balanced take with precision to what you want to say.

You showed evidence from the modlog that exists only because people were able to engage, stopping that would reduce workload for mods but reduce engagement in political discussion.

Lastly, in this lost you went and made a more precisee statement about who needs fighting in Israel, which was encouraged by the modlog morsels. So again I ask: is that not useful? It teaches to avoid overgeneralization, which a lot of people need very much to learn.

Our German politicians for example. they, like most of our populace, react reflexively negative to anything anti Semitic. Because of our shared cultural shame around the genocide. On the other hand we see ideally politicians acting line we did back then and feel as uneasy as you do. So we do what Germans to, we find a more precise way to express what we see. Overgeneralization of redderic against Jews is bad, specification of anti Israeli genocide sentiment good.

I think it would be in the interest of your cause not to blanket ban and instead add another well balanced volunteer mod to your ranks. :)

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] taccihcysp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I vote to defederate the whole instance as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I forgot about that instance after they did their "compliance" requirement against free speech lol.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As a not-a-db0-member, thank you for your attention on this matter.

(yes, I get the irony)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zarniwoop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah ditch em. No space for folks like that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Novi@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I have no say in governance decisions here but for context, I have all of feddit completely blocked because I could not tolerate the bullshit that came across my feed originating from that imstance. 🤮

I would suggest members of db0 vote for defereration in spite of the implications for the network.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Actually with their response to this being even more Zionazi bullshit, can we please just defed?

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

@Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com @db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com I agree. While we're here doing this thread Emopunker is out there bad-jacketing the rest of our users and whining that we're even having this discussion in the first place. There is nothing that could benefit from cooperation between Feddit at this point. If Feddit's admins really do think that complaining about us in MeanwhileOnGrad to a Zionist troll who is also an ex Voat user I should add is prodictive, appropriate, or even acceptable. Then why should we even give them any consideration. It's so clear by this point that most people who are here because of what we value do not want to be a part of it. It's also clear the people who want to keep federating with them or who disapprove of the uncivil responses cited in the post do not have our instance's best interests at heart.

Does anyone really think there is anything redeemable about an instance which allows Zionists, who's admins go whine to a troll and lie about another instance's users because they got banned from it and then that instance began considering defederation because of their shitty behavior which is seemingly backed up by the other admins by their refusal to remove or reprimand that admin for their shitty behavior. Is this even worth considering or debating at this point?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jackr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

voting to defed the instance, we should not tolerate any instance that actively chooses to harbor fascists, and the admins seem to largely agree with the decisions the mods of these oomms made.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lithiumground@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 15 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Ban 'em. If they want to host literal genocide enabling content. Its undeniable at this point and if you are still supporting Israel you can join them in Cocitus.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 days ago (6 children)

I'm all for banning the listed communities, although I'd candidate giving their c/buyfromeu a temporary pass given the other societal context surrounding it (finding and promoting alternatives to produces and services from the US, the other big zionist state in the list). How long a pass? Uuuuh dunno, something like three strikes or whatever.

Regarding Note 2: For the time being I am against a full instance ban, but I expect that position to change. I understand that some people want to still see them so they can "refute their bullshit" but let's be honest, when has that ever worked? We all know f.o are going to double down on their fascism because they feel they have the backing mandate (power) of a state, and those here willing to go and try "ackshually"ing them, are free to do so via an account elsewhere.

[–] rivvvver@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

I understand that some people want to still see them so they can "refute their bullshit" but let's be honest, when has that ever worked?

the thing is that u cannot know what impact it has. mainly my perspective is, i agree that theyre unlikely to change their mind, but its not a 1:1 talk. u appeal to the audience, not the fascists themselves.

therefore, if i could choose between a world where fascist talking points are never refuted or one where they are refuted but never convince the fascists, id still choose the latter.

add to this that u will never flip someones beliefs 180° in one comment thread on the internet. but this does not mean it doesnt plant seeds of doubt that will grow with time. this has worked in the past, it just isnt as flashy and immediate as we expect it to be

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 11 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Defederate from Feddit.org, enough is enough!

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›