this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
186 points (67.5% liked)

/0 Governance

343 readers
91 users here now

A community for discussion and democratic decision making in the Divisions by zero.

Anyone with voting rights can open a governance thread and initiate a vote or a discussion. There's no special keywords you must be aware of before you open a thread, but there are some. here's the governance thread manual.

Answers

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ahoy mateys!

A few of our users have recently pointed out that a lot of the pro-Zionist accounts on the fediverse nowadays seem to come from the feddit.org instance.

Feddit.org's explanation for this situation seems to fit into a few common variations:

  • They accept both pro- and anti-Zionist members, so it's not proof of a bias.
  • They [choose to] comply [in advance] with strict German / Swiss / Austrian laws regarding [overly broad] "antisemitic" language, or they might get in trouble.
  • Calling for the destruction of Israel must obviously mean you want to kill every last man, woman and child, rather than simply wanting to overthrow Netanyahu's genocidal fascist regime. Because [bad faith] reasons.
  • Lots of Euros (and Germans specifically) are pro-Zionist, so they feel like they have to accommodate this view.

But whatever the excuse happens to be, they need to do better imo. Israel is currently the most violent, fascist and genocidal nation state in the Middle East (if you exclude the US military bases there). And yet feddit.org seems to regard the Palestinians fighting against Israel's ongoing illegal occupation of their land as the real terrorists. As such, I am calling for feddit.org to:

  • Explicitly prohibit pro-Zionist accounts from joining.
  • Take measures to resolve their claimed legal issues, e.g., moving their server location to a less regulated jurisdiction, and ensuring that admin accounts remain anonymous regarding their location.
  • Stop referring to folks who call for "Death to Israel" or similar as though they are the terrorists or violent extremists. The Zionist Israeli settlers, the murderous IDF rapists, and the entirety of the Israeli government are clearly the violent ethnostate extremists we should be worried about, not the Palestinians in Gaza who are fighting for their lives every single day against completely disproportionate levels of Zionist violence.

More context

Our instance already voted to ban pro-Zionist accounts (see https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/60585441 for reference) and the rule that was implemented is here: Golden Rule #8.

As further context, you can find relevant comments and discussion in this post by a banned feddit admin in MoG (that fact they chose to post in MoG is in itself quite telling), and this post about their defederation from quokk.au over anti-semitism allegations has recently become active again.

I've also pulled out some choice morsels from the modlog to illustrate the sort of thing we are talking about:

This one says it all... mrdown@lemmy.world being banned for calling out feddit.org users for being Zionist apologists. It's apparently "xenophobic" to state a few hard truths.

If you have had similar experiences on feddit.org, please feel free to share in the comments.

Voting instructions

I am proposing to ban the following communities from feddit.org, which seem to be the most problematic communities in terms of hosting pro-Zionist posts/comments:

Upvote this post if you want dbzer0 / anarchist nexus to ban these communities.

Downvote this post if you'd prefer not to ban these communities.

Note 1: Votes from external instances do not count, unless one of our admins has vouched for you.

Note 2: If you think feddit.org deserves a full instance ban instead, or have alternative suggestions, then please leave your comments below. If enough people think that's the better option, then we'll do that instead.

Note 3: Although I don't really expect this to happen, if feddit.org agrees to make policy changes to address these issues then we are willing to reassess the situation.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think this will raise the chances of an echo chamber happening here, and I have not seen the Zionism that you are claiming it is be as widespread as you are claiming to be. I oppose until you can convince me otherwise.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] emmy67@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Who needs Zionists messing up the joint? Not me. Defed 100%

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] heckypecky@lemmy.dbzer0.com 76 points 3 days ago (14 children)

"you should be lined up against a wall and shot"

"Kill yourself"

It blows my mind how this type of speech is being used by the op as proof that they're on the right side of things. This is so wack that some part of me wants to believe this is some kind of social experiment to find out how far you can push people on social media until they push back against the echo chamber.

But I doubt it is. It seems more likely that this mod is leveraging his position to instrumentalize this community and shape it after his own vision of political activism. All under a laughable guise of democracy. Every single vote on this instance has been presented in a biased and manipulative way that leaves no doubt what the outcome "should" be. How very democratic of you. Slow clap.

Hey, unruffled: your attempts at social engineering and radicalization are ham-fisted and painful to watch.

I initially joined db0 because it seemed like one of the more heterogenous communities on Lemmy. That there was no clear label that comes with the db0 tag like "the tankie" (hexbear) or "the normie" (world). That it had the shortest list of defederations in comparison with the other bigger instances.

Over the past few months this has changed. There has been a shift towards echo chamber, armchair revolution and increasingly more hateful language. Give it three more votes and you'll be voting in favor of roasting babies on a stick. Because free Palestine, or Zionism, or something. SMH.

I don't like being told what to think about a certain topic. Even when that view aligns with my own. And before the mob frothing at the mouth charges at me - yes I'm German and yes, free Palestine and down with Israel (preferably with not a single additional life lost).

For all instance members reading this:

"Don't worry you'll get the wall"

Do you want to be associated with people who unironically spout this type of hatred? I don't. Bye, db0

[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Yeah you nailed it. There’s been quite a few votes with quite a few vocal people that are just not it. I left sh.itjust.works to come here because the vibe shifted on a similar trajectory. I’ve been donating to this instance monthly since I joined, but I’m close to pulling the fucking plug on it.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Calling for the destruction of Israel must obviously mean you want to kill every last man, woman and child, rather than simply wanting to overthrow Netanyahu's genocidal fascist regime.

They complain of users being misinterpreted, but when those users use deliberately inflammatory language elsewhere, it's not a stretch for a moderator to then interpret messages like 'death to Israel' as calling for further violence—implicitly against civilians—and taking action based on it. Supporting the genocide against Palestine is wrong, but so is calling for retributory violence against Israeli civilians, explicitly or implicitly. Their moderation problematically confuses anti-Zionism and antisemitism at times, but it's not an action they should be blocked or defederated over.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] timestatic@feddit.org 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Guy from the "evil zionist instance" here. Yeah no, this strong radical language should not be rationalized as something constructive. db0 mods shouldn't meddle in the moderation of feddit from what I can see is clearly language that turns the discussion bad faith. There's space for constructive discussion but pretty much none of the examples shown here are.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deedan06_@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 3 days ago (6 children)

I get why you are doing this, and while I can generally relate, this would shut off a huge portion of the fediverse from me. I am austrian and all german speaking and european communities are there. the loss would be significant. Lemmy already has a problem of a limited selection of topics and this would take one away,

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Literally same (I'm from Germany tho), but them having no issue with outright Zionazi, vile evronationalist or NATO-bootlicking slop, while deleting leftists or just generally humanist comments (imagine not wanting a genocidal colonial entity to exist) because e.g.:

~~Israel~~ is a state, not a "state"

is entirely unacceptable. Banning those comms is what I believe to be a nice balance, keeps out their reactionary politics, while allowing for the rest of the communities to still be interacted with.

You can create an RSS feed or an alt on like IDK lemmy.zip

Edit: With how they have been reacting to this, and doubling down on the valid points in this post, I believe a full defend would be much better

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ZeroGravitas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Sure, ban those communities. But, out of curiosity, what does an instance wide community ban achieves that my own block list cannot? I already have a sizeable feddit.org presence on said list, so I doubt I would personally see any difference.

Not a big fan of instance banning though, unless there's serious evidence of wrongdoing on our instance from their users. I'm not a wallflower that needs protecting from opinions, I can make my own mind and choose what to read and what to engage with. See: personal blocklist.

[–] draco_aeneus@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can require everyone to maintain their own blocklist, sure. But new users won't benefit from it. Making every single person individually investigate and judge every single bad user/community doesn't seem practical?

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Not to mention it forces new users to be exposed to zionism and genocidal apologia so they can judge.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 3 days ago (16 children)

Just yesterday I had an odd interaction with an .ml user who reposted a straight-up nazi tweet, by a nazi profile, even with their own thread title resembling a frequent nazi dogwhistle. Several non-.ml users, apparently mostly from feddit, pointed out the post looks like it was posted by a nazi. .ml users responded in part by attacking their instance allegiance (calling them "whingy fedditers"). Since I posted enough clear evidence of the Twitter profile being a fascist, OP commendably deleted their thread.

What I saw there is feddit users being met with a hate boner from .ml and their correct suspicions of a tweet that looks antisemitic indeed being antisemitic being ignored and made light of.

That's my personal experience with feddit and its zionism, and consequently I've ended up suspicious of some of Lemmy users' standards regarding this whole matter.

The examples of feddit moderation posted here in OP are almost entirely sanctions against grave personal attacks. I am completely unconvinced that this is proof of the moderators' zionist positions. "Fuck you, you piece of trash" and "fuck you and your whole family" is not "a few hard truths". I'm also unsure if I get the context right, is mrdown a Palestinian? Many of those comments break the most elementary civility standards and verge into murderous fantasies.

Calling for the destruction of Israel must obviously mean you want to kill every last man, woman and child, rather than simply wanting to overthrow Netanyahu’s genocidal fascist regime.

Then say it like that? No, destroying a country is not the same as overthrowing its regime, those are different things. I support the latter with regards to Israel, but would hardly dare say the former.

This post was supposed to convince me feddit's behaviour is problematic. I come away with the opposite impression. So, I vote against the bans.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (7 children)

Passing Zionism and Israel as representing the Jewish People is the most anti-semitic thing there is because the actions of that ideology and that nation are some of the most depraved imaginable: portraying Zionism and Isreal as representing the Jewish People is the logical equivalent of claiming that the commiting of Genocide (including explicitly targetting children) and even participating in the running of a pedophile ring (the Epstein one, which Mossad supported) are "Jewish things".

Meanwhile there are the more traditional kinds of anti-semitism which do not taint all Jewish people by conflating them as a group with depraved ideologies and nations and instead just directly slander Jewish People for being Jewish.

And this bring us to your post: you're saying that we should overlook the actions of the first kind of anti-semite, by claiming that in us doing otherwise would weaken efforts against the second kind of anti-semite.

Your claim is the very opposite of logic: it is the first kind of anti-semite who are strengthening the messaging of the second kind (for example, under the [IMHO false] axiom that Israel is the same as The Jewish People, then the Mossad's involvement in the Epstein child-sex ring leads to the mathematically logical conclusion that Jews are pedophiles or at least supporters of pedophilia) because the second kind can leverage the depraved Israeli and Zionist actions and the link to the Jewish People claimed by the first kind to slander all Jews.

Because of this connection between these two kinds of anti-semites, in reality those fighting the former kind of anti-semite weaken the second whilst those protecting the former strengthen the latter.

And this brings us to feddit.org being filled to the brim with the first kind of anti-semite and activelly protecting them from criticism.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] emmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Get rid of them please. Defed completely

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 days ago (4 children)

No. I have issues with how this is approached and communicated primarily, and if those are addressed maybe there is enough information to support. I'll try to keep it brief:

  1. There isn't really any indication about what we hope to achieve with the community bans. What concrete improvements do we hope for and are we taking any steps to see if they are achieved? It reads to me like a LOT of words explaining why they are utter shit (no disagreement), but then doesn't connect any further dots, seems to just imply "so clearly our users should not see those" or something.

  2. Frankly it's unclear to me why I see largely Flatworm proposing these lately, and little POV from the wider admin and mod team. It's no shade to you Flat, I like the cut of your jib. But this is an anarchist instance, if we are proposing rules that impact all our users, I need to start seeing a lot more broad weigh-in from the other people doing the work to keep this place running.


Now for both of these there are charitable interpretations for why I'm not seeing what I think I should. But I'm not willing to guess on that and shouldn't have to. This is frankly a totally insufficient basis, as written, for governance action. As written, I say absolutely not.

Leave my feed and default interactions alone please unless we are going to see better and wider justification.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thanks, don't shoot the messenger though, I'm just the only admin willing to write these governance posts up. We do discuss these things internally in our admin chat before posting them.

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I've defended you on the last one and said similar, that the phrasing led me to assume internal discussion.

And I know we're a cantankerous bunch at best lol, hard to please everyone. But it needs to be clear this isn't the Flatworm show, please, because of how central that is to the premise and organizing principles here. Ya know?

But hey, I don't actually DO anything to help around here. I don't want my perspective to come off entitled, and I deeply appreciate the work you and others do.

Maybe for these governance decisions, a primary post with the main info as is, and one or more top level comments with specific categories of additional info? Maybe a blurb or POV from each admin/mod team contributor, maybe a section with concrete "we want this to improve by doing such", or etc.

As is, it's beginning to ring alarm bells for me and requires too many assumptions.

Edit - to elaborate a little more since I never really manage to be brief, the biggest thing I've liked about this instance from when I first got to know it, is the commitment to transparency around decision-making. I'm just asking for that. If trying to change instance governance, the discussion among y'all should simply be here. I can imagine that poses some challenges.

So if that's deemed unacceptable, and we're to simply receive a condensed and unified blanket POV representing the team - that hasn't actually been done unless that fact is presented and declared, ideally by all parties whose perspective fits under that blanket. Ideally with a dissenting one(s) too, if not all can accommodate the motion into their own actual wishes for the instance. OR we should be seeing varying other proposals (maybe we do?) and not what are apparently effectively committee-produced ones. See what I mean? Evidence of group decision, evidence of differing opinions, etc.

I'm more willing to make charitable assumptions with y'all than just about anywhere, and I'm telling y'all that even with that, this isn't enough. I can't tell how anyone feels but you, and the goals need some guesses too. But again, thank you for being the one willing to take the effort here.

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, you called me out directly for what you characterized as a borderline personal vendetta in that previous defense. I am glad that you seem to see some of the same signs and signals that I do. My alarm bells just happened to go off slightly sooner than yours, with more intensity. I believe we are coming from the same place of concern based on what you've said here.

I do take a somewhat less charitable view of how the admin conversations on these topics transpire. My perspective, and please note that this is my own personal imagining of events, is that an admin who has a pet governance topic takes that topic to the rest of the group. They make their case for it, and in the absence of much pushback, they post it for general governance discussion. Regardless of whether or not this is accurate, the plausibility of it based on what we observe directly should give us all pause. Hence, I previously suggested that Flatworm/unruffled should take a hiatus from admin duties.

The optics are off, and it is troubling.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 3 days ago (7 children)

I never see pro-Zio stuff on c/buyfromeu. I don't interact much with feddit anyway, but I'm really not sure about this one.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] LucidNightmare@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If the admins of this instance think there are clear zionist apologia, and have proof of said zionist apologia, then I will leave it to them to do what is best. I am anti-zionist, but haven't seen these issues with my own eyes in real time.

Thanks for bringing it to my attention, and hopefully, Feddit can fix the issues described here, but like Flatworm, I don't think it will happen. I don't like defederation, but as a real last resort, I trust in the admins here at db0.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Calling for the destruction of Israel

Are our brains getting worse, or why can't we be specific anymore?

Why do we need to use the same language as extremists?

This is the same stupidity level as Trump saying "We will get rid of some politicians, you will see!!!" and later explaining that it means that the people should just not vote for them anymore, because he is great.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NewDayRocks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (7 children)

I agree the mods are using antisemitism as a bit of a blanket power for abuse, but this whole post just sounds like personal beef.

Their rules look reasonable and most of their mod logs look acceptable. Some of the removed comments are over the top hate.

I never see these posts in my feed but I would disagree with this ban.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] goldyLocks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hector@lemmy.today 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I didn't notice the instances but did run across a number of genocide deniers counter accusing everyone of being bigoted just the other day. Then playing victim when called on it, as usual. On reddit calling them on it means reddit will violate your account on unrelated posts that aren't against the rules in short order, I noticed a pattern. You can't back and forth with the influence agent accounts on reddit.

Anyway the one I talked to yesterday sure looked like an influence agent and there was a group, and a larger bloc of votes with them. I suspect government sponsored fuckery, mechanized troll divisions slumming it down on lemmy here, because somehow our leaders are more concerned with Israel having unqualified support than they are about the countries they supposedly represent. Might have something to do with them and their monied donors fucking children at epstein's place that they have videos of.

That and all of our leaders are nihlistic, they believe in nothing other than self. There is nothing they wouldn't support if it was in their interests to do. They would sell their own village out to a company poisoning their water and air if it served them. And because of all the child fucking support for Israel amongst the elite in the west, those sold out politicians naturally support them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

With how big some of those communities are, blocking them is paramount to defederating from the instance itself in terms of losing access to posts unrelated to Israel or Zionism (a quarter of Lemmy monthly active users are subscribed to !europe@feddit.org).

Zionism should be spoken out against, but the repercussions of further Threadiverse fragmentation should also be considered. Just as troubling are extremist posts on lemmy.ml, Lemmygrad, and Hexbear. However, if their federation is maintained with the benefit of Threadiverse unity gained (with the user retaining the option of implementing their own blocks), then what amounts to partial defederation with another major instance in this case should also be avoided.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] leMe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

our anti-zionism rule follows the same fallacy, as anti-semitism laws in many european did: it is too narrow and too broad at the same time.

it is too broad in a sense that we talked about banning problematic users. now we talk about banning communities, which cover much of a language. dach is a big collection bucket for europeans speaking german. in their sidebar they mention, that they want to keep palestine / israel discussions out of the comm - which is fair play IMO.

it is too narrow in a sense, that it is hyper focussed on one issue. zionists are bad and commit atrocities, which need to be harshly reprehended. but there are many bad things, which do not get caught by this rule. as an example: what happens to the uyghur population in china is simply not ok. still .ml is an instance, which quite openly denies that anything even happens. yet we are not discussing banning accounts and or communities, which do these things.

i would much rather have an anti-discrimination rule, which covers zionism, racism, sexism, discrimination on hair colour, medical things, ... this rule should also define what actions we can and want to take again who and what.

this would cover more problems, while not excluding anyone. hopefully also reduce needed arguments.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grainne@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Defed them entirely, we don’t need to allow a ZioNazi bar here.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›