Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
“Only she can provide the complete account. Some may not like what they hear, but the truth matters. For example, both President Trump and President Clinton are innocent of any wrongdoing. Ms. Maxwell alone can explain why, and the public is entitled to that explanation.”
There it is. Fishing for a pardon and giving Trump an easy path to grant it "in the interest of public disclosure", when she's already flagged to him that she won't disclose anything about him.
It's just like dictators. If you and only you can be the one to fix something, you shouldn't do it.
If you are wondering what the condition is:
Ms. Maxwell is prepared to speak fully and honestly if granted clemency by President [Donald] Trump,” Markus wrote in a statement.
It'd be a cold day in hell, but I hope she gets clemency and absolutely dunks on this wet turd.
You're suggesting he'd grant her clemency so that she can honestly confess against him?
I know Trump is dump but still.
The more likely scenario is that behind the scenes she promises to make Trump look good in her confessions if he grant her clemency. A Win-Win situation for them
She's already promised to make him look good in front of the scenes.
Isn’t that usually how plea deals work? Reduced or eliminated punishment so you can flip them to get a bigger fish?
No, because usually the one on the side of the prosecution offering the plea deal isn't also the bigger fish.
Don’t be obtuse, she’s been meeting with his lawyers, this is all bullshit. She’s going to lie and “exonerate” him in exchange for a pardon. We’ve all seen where this is going.
Well yeah. A man can dream though
What a world we live in where the best we can do is dream about justice.
Sorry if I was harsh, meant it to be more tongue in cheek..
All good, I didn't take it that way. Also why I started with a cold day in hell. That shit ain't happening
"I will say whatever you want for a pardon, since we were best friends for decades"
I can’t wait until he discards her like he does everyone else.
The only way to know for sure what's truly lurking in the dark confines of Ghislaine Maxwell's head is to crack it open and look inside.
she wont say anything useful, she just wants the attention on epstein to go away quickly as possible.
This sociopath can’t be trusted.
Looks like she’s extorting Trump, isn’t she?
She's a monster who should rot in hell.
It would be completely unsurprising for this depraved regime that the only person who got justice for their crimes gets pardoned.