this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2026
886 points (96.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

37802 readers
3565 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I have an old Radio from the 50s - big wooden piece of furniture with a turntable and everything. The plug on that thing is absolutely terrifying, super flimsy and so small you have to almost touch the prongs to plug it in.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

A plug is probably the easiest thing to replace on an appliance.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Not every old design was better but some were.

My wife absolutely refuses to give up her early 1970's GE range. It's impossible to get parts for it so eventually it's going to have to be replaced. One of the actually nice features it has is is that all the push button controls are on the range hood. Don't have to worry about them getting greasy while cooking or little kids turning the burners on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They would cost $5000 each and burn your house down

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago

Porteus mills made such a good product they went out of business.

[–] Lioffproxy@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

This is the approach galanz did I think except the shitiest patents modernized.

[–] jenings@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Would a company like that go out of business from not selling the same shit to people over and over?

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

They can sell easily replaceable components that will break down no matter how well built the appliance is.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chocrates@piefed.world 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Was gonna say, I do like th modern efficiencies. I'm waiting for a start up to make a heat pump oven

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AsyncTheYeen@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Me when I have no idea how capitalism works lmao

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Planned obsolescence is a cornerstone of the business model of every large corporation. They're never going to make a product that could challenge that. And no startup will achieve the volume needed to sell these at a price that's even remotely realistic.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I think there's two parts to modern electronics that make them hard to repair.

One is indeed planned obsolescence, companies like apple deliberately making things harder to repair. This is easy to solve, but what's in it for businesses that only exist to make money when the average consumer is happy to suck this crap up?

But there is a non deliberate side. So many things that used to be modules built with discrete components have been moved to a single chip. Radio parts is an example, they used to requir a lot more external discrete parts and you can now get a single chip doing Bluetooth, WiFi etc with minimal external components.

As more goes to a single chip, it's single expensive parts that can fail rather than what might have been a single capacitor or resistor failing in a larger circuit.

Of course the planned obsolescence uses this by making custom chips that you literally cannot buy if you wanted to. But there is still a legitimate side to this.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

For household appliances you could use some standard microcontroller. Pair that with open source software and you have long-term repairability.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PsycyTuna@feddit.nl 2 points 4 days ago

Mostly survivorship bias

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

This is basically the context of “Dune”

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Y'all are going to hate this, but IMO a more viable solution is a subscription model. The more reliable an appliance is, the less you spend on it in the long run, so less profit for the manufacturer. With a subscription, the more reliable they make it, the more profit they get. Then you just need sufficient competition to keep the subscription prices low.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›