They didn't take this chance to criticize global warming?
this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2026
470 points (98.4% liked)
News
35749 readers
2245 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Trump did almost immediately...
But that's only because people who think they understand it but don't keep saying "global warming" instead of climate change
As long as naive idiots who think they understand keep saying "global warming" you can't expect the other idiots to understand the problem.
But good luck convincing any of them to stop using the phrase they learned 30 years ago, or to incorporate new information.
In 30 more years they'll all be acting like boomers because they never actually understood any of this, they're literally doing the same as boomers and insisting what they were told in he high will always be true
It's incredibly depressing knowing it's gonna keep happening.
The only benefit of "climate change" over "global warming" is that it does not suggest it will get warmer everywhere, though in turn it fails to communicate that the global annual temperature is steadily increasing.
And worse yet, the change in terminology suggests a retreat from a prior position, allowing denialists to suggest that scientists changed their mind and they are two distinct concepts.
It's a terminology change not worth arguing about. Global warming causes local climate change, and climate change is just the local effect of global warming.
We should absolutely use whichever term communicates best with the audience we are trying to reach, but mocking someone for the terminology they use is counterproductive and reinforces the fallacy that the ideas are meaningfully different.
The main benefit of rhetorically talking about "climate change" instead of "global warning" is that "climate change" sounds fairly innocuous to the layperson, and can be easily misconstrued as "natural".
How many conservatives have you heard say something like "of course the climate changes, it happens every day!"
There's a reason the bush administration pushed the "climate change" narrative so hard.
These deep freezes are literally caused by global warming.
The higher layers of the atmosphere are unusually warm, causing instability in the arctic weather systems which lead to these jet streams escaping the vortex, blasting freezing air way farther south than it usually goes.
I've tried explaining this to my conservative family and they just stare at me blankly and nod like they think it's a cope that doesn't deserve their attention...
load more comments
(9 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Snow is woke
It is made up of snowflakes so this checks out.
E: I see someone has already pointed this out further down the comments, my bad.
Snow can’t be woke. It’s white.
/s
It will definitely keep your ass woke if you don’t moderate.
Ashton Kutchner hates freedom, and is integral to bringing the trojan horse of ai threat detection in to survel everything everyone does or says online.
Family Guy had a good take on Ashton, a better tv show for him...
So many pieces of shit on that show, like Kutchner and rapey Masterson
load more comments
(2 replies)
Thanks Mamdani...
This is great! Obama is finally off the hook.
I can't really speak for NYC, because I don't live there anymore. I'm in Albany, NY, 150 mi north, and it's been hovering around -15 to -20 centigrade. (Water freezes at 0 centigrade.) A quick weather search shows it's been hovering at/below freezing down there. Snow doesn't melt when it's this cold out. I don't know where the fuck the post thinks the snow is going to go.
They don't care about the snow. They care about getting people mad at their enemy. The post, and conservatives more generally, are bad,. dishonest, people.
They know what they’re saying is stupid. They are trying to build anger and when there is nothing material to twist, they have to invent something. Eventually they will build an entire alternate universe mythology around Mamdani, just as they do with all their enemies.
Canadian here. "Barely risen above freezing" means it's above freezing. That means it's warm. Are right wing pundits just a bunch of wussies?
They’re narrative opportunists. They seek out ways to dilute the information sphere, because that weakens the effectiveness of any productive conversation overall.
- Did cigarettes give you cancer, or could it have been asbestos from an old house?
- Did greenhouse gases cause global warming, or is it cold outside right now and that means everyone except you is an idiot?
- Are we setting up a surveillance state, or do we just want infrastructure to help you find your lost dog one day?
- …
Truth becomes arbitrary, opinionated, prone to interpretation… how can society continue to operate when they can’t agree on anything? When the ball isn’t in the court of institutional knowledge, it’s free of the taking by whoever wants to construct narrative in their favor.
Check out what percent of psychology studies these days can actually be reproduced via peer review.
Does the pope shit in the woods?
Does a gorilla train in the alps?
How DARE Zohran Mamdani NOT control the Weather!
-People who KNOW that Trump has NOTHING to do With this whole Epstein Debacle!
And you absolutely know that if the snow did melt, conservatives would be blaming him for not making the snow stay.
LITERALLY in-group/out-group behavior
load more comments
(1 replies)
How cute. It's almost like we're back in the Obama era when the most inconsequential of things make a Democratic leader weak in conservative media. It's really jarring when Mamdani's news is juxtaposed with Trump's ICE bullshit, involvement in the Epstein files, threatening other countries with annexation, ruining the economy, etc.
Aren’t these the same people who believe in a rodent to tell them how long winter is?
or an almanac that is basically 50/50 guesses?
Lol, they copied the groundhog day from Pennsylvania in Wiarton, Ontario, an area farther north. So the whole "if he sees his shadow, it means six more weeks of winter, otherwise spring comes at a normal time" is actually worse than our normal spring time (though many years in the past few decades have been exceptions to this). Like if it warmed up by mid-March, that would be an early spring.
Worst part is that I noticed this on my own. Like I'm probably not the first, but it's not like the usual BS where people might repeat it but are also quick to say it's inaccurate, my experience is that the groundhog gets brought up, I'll mention that even the "bad case" sounds way better than reality, then people stop and think before agreeing that yes, it is that way. I'm hoping it's because they weren't taking it seriously in the first place.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Ah yes, socialism is to blame for... checks notes... snow in New York...
When you blame the mayor for the weather.
Is it possible, being as how snow removal is the city's responsibility, they're actually complaining about that? If snow removal isn't done in a timely manner, slush does indeed form and just moves around, not melting much.
Quickly reading the article suggests that's the actual complaint.
I like the Guardian and Mamdani but come on here. Let's focus on whether or not that complaint is accurate, and whether he's had any chance to impact the city's snow removal plans, which are generally done well in advance by someone other than the mayor.
Former NYC resident here. Growing up, NYC rarely got snow like the storm we just had the last week of January. Like maybe it happens Once every 2-5 years. On top of that, the city tends to warm up quickly because of the jet stream and being on the coast, so the snow tends to melt faster. (Specific heat of water keeps the temps there above freezing.) It's been freakishly cold in the city, well below the freezing point of water, for an extended period of time, so it's not melting as fast. It just gets pushed around. Also, the mayor took office 1 month ago. Like give the guy a break.
Thank you! Same thing happened in the South after the freak storm in January, we had snow/ice for like 10 days which is hugely abnormal, no snow removal was done, streets became sheets of ice. Mail delivery stopped for a week. Everything did. Schools shut down over a week. I worked from home for a week. Number of people blaming the mayor? 0
The south tends to budget far less for snow removal than norther states. So when a big storm hits, it shuts things down way way longer because it takes them even longer just to clear it. The actual Post article, uses three photos as reference images, and I am sure those were the worst they could find. However, you can see from those images that streets are mostly clear. The sidewalks are a different story, businesses are responsible for clearing the snow from the sidewalks in front of their stores. With respect to parking, parking in NYC has always been ass no matter what. If people still choose to drive in the city in this weather, and they aren't planning accordingly to leave themselves more time to find parking, that's on them. NYC has extensive public transportation, and it isn't super expensive. I usually cycle to work up here in Albany, but with the cold and snow I am taking the bus. The public transit up here in Albany can't hold a candle to what NYC has, and I have no problem making it to work on time or getting shopping done. (I'm 5 miles from work, and 3-10 miles from my preferred grocery stores.)
politicians and oligarchs raping children and eating babies while giving away state secrets and money to Israeli and Russian spies
Establishment politicians: …We should just move on.
The snow isn’t melting and it’s inconvenient
Also Establishment politicians: blame socialism with every billionaire backed news organization and launch several expensive sensationalist investigations
load more comments
(2 replies)
How stupid can people be? Don't they know it's the Jews that control the weather?
With their space lasers!
And my axe!
Sucks the streets are slushy. Maybe take i dk the metro?
Are you trying to question my sacred right to drive anywhere in my ludicrously oversized emotional support vehicle?
load more comments
(2 replies)
.... wut
Must be the water.
Well damn Jackie I can't control the weather!
Clearly Trump is punishing another blue city by withholding the aid of his weather Sharpie
Bruh, even in the South there are still huge piles of snow and it's been like 70/80 degrees for the past four days
The man solves global warming in three months and suddenly he's the bad guy.
If they are going to blame Mamdani, they should know that ultimately it will be Trump's fault. And also God's.
Aren't they against cloud seeding?
They're against anything that it's currently convenient for them to pretend to be against for the sake of Dear Leader et al.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Hey southern people/non-phsyics-readers?
Snow is the best insulator to keep snow from melting
view more: next ›