this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
455 points (99.3% liked)

politics

28220 readers
2095 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Threat of stationing immigration agents around voting locations has become a concern as it can be a deterrent to legal residents of color who are concerned they may be harassed by federal agents

The White House refused to rule out following through on the threat of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents being sent out to “surround the polls” when voters cast ballots in this November’s midterm elections as a way of depressing Democratic turnout and boosting chances of Republican victories in the House of Representatives and Senate.

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on Thursday said she could offer “no guarantee” that ICE personnel would not be stationed at polling sites when Americans are in the process of choosing whether to extend the Republican stranglehold on power at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue.

She had been asked about former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon’s recent call for Trump to deploy ICE around election sites on his War Room podcast on Tuesday, just days after Trump himself called for a Republican “takeover” of vote-counting in Democratic-led states and municipalities.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 107 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Democratic leadership is sleepwalking us into a permanent state of authoritarian rule.

[–] French75@slrpnk.net 32 points 1 week ago

That's not fair. They are still working super hard to disarm the people in blue states.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 92 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The very act of floating this idea is election fraud. Even if they don't do it, threatening to do it could discourage voters.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We can offer no guarantee that democrat voters won't be harmed, detained or even murdered while voting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daannii@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago

When Obama ran, local organizations rented vans and escorted people to and from polls.

We can do it again if needed.

[–] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Obviously.

This is obviously where it was going.

From day one, from the first lie, to the arming of his own private army, this has been the goal. Obviously.

Americans will be surprised, of course. As always.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Americans will be surprised, of course. As always.

No one's accused Americans of being smart.

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

"Back when it was step 3, all the alarmists were warning me about how bad step 10 will be. Now that we're at step 7, the logical thing to do is continue to accuse people of being alarmist."

  • 9 out of 10 Americans (real Americans)
[–] Biffsbraincell@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Republicans have stolen every presidential election they've won since 2000. There haven't been consequences yet, and the future won't be any different unless we stand up.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They tried damn hard to steal the ones they lost as well, and know that because of the last year they may not get voted for, for another couple decades. They know they can't win, so they are abandoning democracy.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Oh no what happens if ICE agents around polling locations are shot dead.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Everyone else at the polling place leaves and probably doesn't come back.

Polling location(maybe others) are now closed for public safety from the radical left Democrats.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Saljid@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is what Hitler's SA did, so that's to be totally expected.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How the fuck did we get to a point where it's normal for the government to say these things?

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Conservatives stopped respecting our Constitution and our nation as a whole.

But they're pretty good at showing up to vote, unlike many other Americans. That, combined with our electoral system being a joke and designed to allow a minority to have control, and you've got our current situation.

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Let everyone you know that mail-in ballots are still an option... but educate them that they must bring the ballot to the post office IN PERSON, and ask the postal staff to post-mark it IN FRONT OF THEM. I have read (please correct me if I'm wrong!) that works around the recent regulation change that allows dropped-off post to be stamped when it's delivered, instead of when it's first dropped off, which is a rat-fucking tactic to increase the likelihood of ballots being marked late, knowing they'll probably take many days from drop-off to delivery.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It can't be guaranteed that an ICE jackass won't be shipped to the local junkyard.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Can you imagine getting abducted when you try to vote? Now you don't have to!

I am sure this will help the voter turnout and is definitely not a thinly veiled threat meant to cause voter suppression.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (9 children)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can't guarantee I won't communicate with my community to show up to the polling stations with a large group of armed citizens to ensure we can vote safely without the interference of terrorists.

Doesn't stop them from ratfucking the votes after they're submitted, but hey, gotta do what we can.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well I guess we’re going to be exercising our second amendment rights because that’s tyranny.

[–] itistime 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Gear up, the hopefools will learn too late.

[–] BigTuffAl@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why is she so obsessed with getting ICE agents killed?

[–] DronePirate@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UncleArthur@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Weird. I didn't realise all the American polling stations are located so near the borders with other countries.

[–] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I read somewhere that anywhere within 250 mile (I think this was the number) of an airport counts as a boarder

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is dicey. If it happens, there will be a lot of problems around the polling areas. The fascists will use that as an excuse to invalidate the results.

[–] French75@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They will have 100 different reasons to invalidate the results anyway.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

They ~~will~~ have 100 different reasons to invalidate the results anyway.

It's crazy to think they don't already have them loaded up.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] amikulo@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't know what the conditions will be for my blue city in a red state come November. My plan is to vote early and spend election day seeking out ICE at any polling locations to film and heckle them. If they want to arrest me, my vote is already in and it will take them out of play for their role threatening voters. MN is showing us how we massively outnumber them and can stymie their tactics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

That's atrocious.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Imagine the optics of these rabid dogs pepper spraying people in line to vote

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Prominent Republicans have been saying this kind of thing, in various ways, since at least the 1980s. If people want to delude themselves and call standard Republican stuff "trumpism" or even more incoherent and nebulous things like "maga", I don't know what to tell them. This is stock conservative/Republican stuff.

This is Paul Weyrich in 1980:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GBAsFwPglw

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

"Can't guarantee we won't continue to violate the law with impunity."

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I got PTO, i don't mind protecting people and staying at the voting place all day to protect them from the ICE thugs taking them to a concentration camp.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›