this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
332 points (98.8% liked)

politics

28244 readers
2869 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

After days of speculation over exactly what Donald Trump meant when he called on Republicans to "take over" American elections, the commander in chief has clarified that he will accept the 2026 midterm results — but only if they are "honest."

On Wednesday, Trump told NBC News’ Tom Llamas that he will only accept the results of the 2026 midterm elections if they are "honest," and that if he believes they aren't, then "something else has to happen."

He made the comment after Llamas asked him to clarify what he meant when he called to "nationalize" the elections. Under the U.S. Constitution, the states are given the right to oversee elections. The process has limited input from the federal government.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Same shit he has said every election for 10 years.

I wish people would cop this dumb fuck's modus operandi by now: he'll called it rigged if he looses, and he's also called it rigged if he doesn't win with 100% of the vote everywhere. Because anything otherwise would send him into a spiral of narcissistic collapse.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 0 points 1 week ago

Last time he didn't have a 100,000 strong ICE army

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The most blatant traitor in American history and America still hasn't handled him.

Fucking wild.

Never in my wildest dreams did I think we were this weak.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I grew up in a conservative area, in a conservative household, survival preppers even.

I was raised my whole youth with the narrative that we were collecting guns and supplies for the day that the federal government starts taking away our rights and interfering with democracy.

For my entire younger life, growing up in the cold war, it was the back-country, blue-blooded American way to push back against Russia, against threats to our vote, against government overreach and intereferring in both people's personal lives as well as the business of other countries.

I changed ideology as soon as I escaped and got a taste of reality, but I still do believe we need to protect our democracy with force, and now that's the opposite of the conservative stance and it's like living in the Upsidedown. I understand how we got here, but I am constantly astonished how fucking stupid everyone is. Everyone.

[–] itistime 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I grew up in conservative south. I got wrapped up in the 2a against tyranny too. I agree that it does make sense. I too am baffled by how they are the tyrant’s forces.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago

If you go far enough left, you get your guns back . . .

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When the death certificate is written for the American empire, the cause of death will read “greed, apathy”.

[–] itistime 3 points 1 week ago

I challenge the apathy part. There is a lot of apathy, no doubt. But, I think most who are seen as apathetic are just weak, selfish, and lack foresight. They would prefer a different situation, but not at the cost of their own pain.

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I fully expect him to throw a fit and have to be forcibly removed when it's finally his time to leave the white house.

[–] canuck666777@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

They should be more concerned about what he's going to steal this time around. Whatever stuff he'd be taking with him, he won't be stashing that in his Maralago toilet this time around.

Yeah that happened the first time too.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 4 points 1 week ago

Yep thats the plan.

[–] alexc@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ask him to define ‘fair’ ahead of time. The man has no idea what the word means

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Fair means that he wins. 2020 was unfair because he didn't win. 2024 was fair because he won.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

2024 was unfair because he didn’t win by a landslide.

[–] alexc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I just want him to clarify that out loud…

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago

So, no. No he won’t accept the result unless they rig it. Got it.

[–] canuck666777@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If the US does not get to have free and fair elections then those guys are so descending into civil war.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If people know? Maybe

If the outcome of election night is "The results have been disputed. People are just too stupid to fill out a ballot" then the vast majority will lose interest. And then the complicit oligarch owned news media just won't talk about how fuckface and the christofacists picked the results.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

The results will be "honest" if they are good for him.

[–] NGC2346@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

The most dishonest pedo child eater asking for honesty to concede a win to an opponent

this flashy ass crack really has audacity

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Fuck off, pedo. Just fuck off already.

[–] C1pher@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you need to mention elections "being honest", you want to skew them in some way in your favor eg. "I will only accept, if I win." Like, dude, just fuck off already. You cant run for the third term anyways.

[–] aBucket@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have this nagging feeling that he can

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

If no one stops him he absolutely will

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

He doesnt have the authority to "not accept" an election. Who cares what he thinks about elections. The states conduct the elections, not him. He can go eff himself.

Media companies need to point this out in their headlines. They are misleading people into thinking his opinions matters.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago

The question isn't isn't is it legal - the administration is breaking the law every minute.

The question is who is going to stop them. The point of the ICE army is to have armed force to enforce the GOP coup - who is going to be on the other side?

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

He doesnt get to decide. So he can fuck right off.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Not up to him.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

luckily the president has no role in accepting the results. Ill only accept them if they are actually honest rather than trumpy honest and are not "nationalized"

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 0 points 1 week ago

What happens when the President says he does?

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

What in the goddamn fuck is NATIONALIZED VOTING

I DON'T LIKE THAT VERY MUCH

By honest he means "I win every state no matter what".  

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

The man doesn't know the meaning of the word honest. Hence why he couldn't prove anything last time.

[–] cmeu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Since when did the president get to decide if voters really mean it? This guy just makes up whatever bullshit and it's like well ok I guess

WTF

[–] tamal3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Any idea how polling protection groups will work this time around? I'm not really sure what it means to nationalize voting, nor the extent of what it means to have ICE outside of polling locations.

Edit: I'm looking into joining up with a group to protect the polls this midterm.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

It's a whole helluva lot harder to oppress armed people in large groups.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'd suggest looking for a local Mutual Aid group, if you have one near you. They're the most likely places to find people wanting to join you in that endeavor. If you can't find anything like that, try a local DSA chapter.

Perhaps a local SRA chapter would be interested in that too?

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

For pity's sake, Don, could you please just shut the fuck up for five minutes?!

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

La dee da, la dee da, oh shit the midterms sucked for me! Time to say they're not honest! What's that you say? Oh they were actually good for me? Uhh never mind guys! They're totally honest!