this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
146 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

19071 readers
150 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have seen so many versions of this, I forgot what the original one looks like

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

They're all real ones in my book

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 15 points 1 week ago

real. every prediction i got from computational chemists was wrong

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 7 points 1 week ago

As a computational chemist, I agree: a lot of computational chemistry studies are useless and just a bunch of calculations on a molecule nobody cares about and that will never be synthesized. In most cases, computational chemists get a good result, publish a paper and then delete the files and forget about it because now they have something else to calculate, generally the information of such results will never reach a laboratory. Then there is the other part of computational chemistry: calculating stuff that has already been determined experimentally. For... Reasons. Just a couple days ago I reviewed a paper of this kind: very nice setup, good calculations and so on. Then I went to check the list of molecules they used, and they had experimental results for every one of them. Mind you, they were not testing the computational methods for accuracy, they were genuinely trying to predict those values...

Well anyway, I'll go look my 50 GPUs burn now.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 7 points 1 week ago

The "they have played us for absolute fools" line always gets me laughing, even when I don't fully get the setup.

[–] ZoDoneRightNow@kbin.earth 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is there a name for this meme template?

[–] jackr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

stop doing x(originally stop doing math)

Was this AI upscaled? It's too coherent to be fully AI slop but has a lot of artifacts.