this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
280 points (96.1% liked)

196

19101 readers
13 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 72 points 1 week ago
[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What do the scissors on pink’s shirt mean?

[–] kiara@piefed.blahaj.zone 62 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Is that an actual group, like LGB that are unsupportive of TQ?

Unfortunately, yes.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sadly, yes. There's a pretty notorious transphobic organization calling themselves the LGB Alliance, with the aim of trying to drive a wedge.

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess I can see how it gets messy when you have to figure out visibility. Like could it be seen as concern over the TQ “Not All Men-ing” the movement?

I know that’s a stretch…

Also can I ask an ignorant question from the outside? I always thought the rainbow flag was future-proofed and didn’t understand adding other colors. The rainbow is already the full spectrum of visible light meaning you could change the messaging to include others and keep the same symbol. Thoughts?

[–] UnpledgedCatnapTipper@piefed.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The additions are to highlight the parts of our community that are typically underrepresented, more vulnerable, and facing higher levels of discrimination (i.e. trans people, intersex people, and queer people of color).

It also helps weed out the "LGB without the T" assholes. As a trans woman, seeing just the rainbow flag flying somewhere often makes me think "is this actually a safe place, or do they hate me more than the place next door with no flag?" Usually that isn't the case, but the doubt exists, and it sucks.

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

Yeah makes sense. Even if you include “all” marginalized groups that’s a far cry from “everyone”.

Also agree the ship has sailed on using the rainbow-only flag to mean everything. Thanks for responding to my thought anyway.

[–] GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes. Even some US government websites updated from LGBTQ to LGB. The travel information page is now down to just "Gay and Lesbian travelers."

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

That’s messed up.

Sometimes bi erasure is actually overt

[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Scissoring (the lesbians are over represented) /s

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No way they would wait that long to start pecking down the trans tree.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Fuck Reddit and Fuck Spez.