this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
592 points (99.3% liked)

News

35724 readers
3292 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 233 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah yes voter intimidation, something that only happens in healthy stable democracies of course

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 100 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Last time I voted cops were talking to a guy in a red hat outside, but everyone was chill and they were laughing and joking so I didn't pay attention.

Everyone inside, totally on edge.

I found out later that guy had taken his shirt off and yelled at poll workers which was especially problematic because he had a loaded gun tucked into his pants. No holster and I'm not even sure he had a belt.

He might be there next time too, just in uniform.

I don't give a fuck, because I know what happened in the South when people caved to that kind of voter intimidation. I'm casting a ballet even if there's bullets actively being fired at the polling location.

All this shit does is make voting more important, that's how we need to frame it.

[–] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Im considering finding a local polling location where I can stand watch and gather other like minded people so there are more of us than them there. They will be the intimidated, they are the minority.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Great spirit, terrible idea.

You won't make anyone feel more comfortable, you'll just make things crowded and chaotic.

The only reason anyone should be at a polling location is casting a vote.

You want to group up somewhere and show support, do it a block away within eyesight. Have signs and shit about how voting matters now more than ever.

Chances are ICE will come fuck with you anyways, which is still a win because then they're not at the polling station either.

[–] keckbug@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hi, poll worker here and this is absolutely accurate. If you stand in or near our polling place we will absolutely have you removed.

However… observing polls is a core part of a functional democracy and I strongly encourage you to do so. Each county is a bit different, but essentially every single one of them have some sort of process that you can register as an observer and you’ll be legally protected while observing and documenting what you see. If you’re affiliated with a political party, contact your local officials and they can help facilitate, as most observers are party affiliated.

[–] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Excellent. Thank you. This is what we need to know. We just need to have sufficient numbers of people doing legal observation at the right places.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 65 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You know, for somebody so friendly with Epstein, Bannon sure does seem to be not in jail for some fucking reason?

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, he was pardoned by Trump.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Only for defrauding trump supporters.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Then we'll surround ICE. Fuck em

[–] baller_w@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 week ago

Right. Show up and do the needful.

I’ve seen armed “guards” and my polling station before and it’s unsettling to say the least.

Say no words. Just vote.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 week ago (4 children)

So maybe armed black Panthers should show up to defend the voting stations?

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Armed EVERYONE, panthers, housewives, mechanics, trans teens, latino families, truckers, the entire Village People stereotypical grouping, should be there armed and handing out cookies and coffee and making sure our communities are safe and that everyone, no matter their politics or identity or race or background has their say at the polls.

There are presently about 22,000 ICE agents. There will be somewhere around 100,000 polling stations in the US. Their math for "surrounding all polling stations" just isn't working out.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yup.

Saw a video a week or two ago. Cops roll up. Group of Black Panthers are heavily armed on a public sidewalk. The cops tell them to leave. They say "no". The cops leave.

It's a whole hell of a lot harder to oppress people who are heavily armed and in groups.

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

Panthers tend to known their rights too. Education and confidence are a powerful combination

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know that the Black Panthers have a history of protecting polls while armed, but perhaps it's time we allow people of all colors to be armed and protecting the polls.

There's a lot more of us than there are of ICE.

[–] lectricleopard@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Someone pointed out in another thread that schools and govt buildings where polling stations are already dont permit guns. But if ther are 50 of us there, the 10 of them they can muster will run like the cowards they are.

[–] atlasquill892@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

That's the issue with the government's monopoly on violence here. It's okay if they bring their guns to terrorize people, but it's not okay for ordinary people to protect others.

[–] formergijoe@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Steve Bannon, the Epstein PR guy?

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Yep. Does anyone know if he's in the tRUMP-Epstein files?

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Trump wants ICE to THREATEN NON REPUBLICAN VOTERS WITH GUNS? Wow! They probably need a LOT of Funding for That! Let's give it to Them!

-Democrats Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] randompasta@lemmy.today 26 points 1 week ago

Fucking nazis.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

GET YOUR FUCKING GUNS, Y’ALL

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you can't vote by ballot, vote by bullet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Simple.

Everyone shows up to the polls heavily armed and stays until everyone has voted.

Actually, not even everyone has to be armed. Just enough to form a group. Do not try this on your own. Totally safe if you're in a group that's packing though. They're cowards. They're only going to mess with people who can't defend themselves.

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Oh look, little Stevie is yelling for attention again..

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Server architect? System analyst? Serial apologizer?

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] n4ch1sm0@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Truly the most accurate comparison to ICE on paper. Schutzstaffel (SS) is the one everyone knows about and for practical reasons in the public eye, it's a good analogy, but it'd be beneficial for people be aware of Sturmabteilung (SA), because the SS were far worse following the Nazi party's truly solidifying grip on power. History really does rhyme.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I'm calling it: they're going to have Palantir set them up with a database of likely Democrat voters paired with facial recognition and detain everyone who is a positive match on their way to the polls until the polling station closes.

And then they'll have the mail-in votes thrown out.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] klay1@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

When Hitler was choosing his cabinet, he made Göhring Minister of the interior, which was head of the police. Then they put their SS inside of the Reichstag, when they cast the vote if Hitler should have absolute power (for a limited time, to solve a fake issue). The police, now under Göhring, didn't stop them. The SS stood everywhere, shouting Nazi paroles and threatening the Reichstag-members to apply violence if the vote does not come out their way. Back then in the Reichstag, voting wasn't anonymous. The deed was done. Some brave leftists still openly said they cannot vote yes, many were later captured and killed. Hitler obviously just cancelled the limited time part and kept the absolute power.

Many Germans later regretted, not having fought more, when they saw it all coming.

Guys, everything was alarming so far. Announcing to have ICE at the polls is even more alarming. You cannot have the Shitler get that far, where it is too late. You must act now!

Good luck over there, regards from Germany.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are far more polling locations than ice agents. Even if they selectively pick the purple ones and deploy every agent they're unlikely to end up with more than a couple agents at each.

I guess that also means those agents either don't get to vote or have to do early voting.

Imagine they lose the midterms by preventing ICE goons from voting by making them work all day

[–] kboos1@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

So if ICE is protecting the polls from voter fraud and a Republican gets replaced with a Democrat then wouldn't that be proof that the election was fair?

Like proving himself wrong.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] EtAl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

Great. Send half of them to the North Pole, half of them to the South. Problem solved.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

They say it is to make sure that "illegals" didn't vote.

In reality the real goal of ICE is to be gestapo. Undocumented immigrants are just being used as excuse.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Might have to bring out my rosebud

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

When a Republican tells you what they're going to do, believe them. There will never be another fair election in the United States.

[–] jason@discuss.online 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Eggs and water balloons. We should start with that now. What are they going to do?

[–] CCMan1701A@startrek.website 8 points 1 week ago (7 children)

What does ICE have to elections? Shouldn't they be at border or something?

[–] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're thinking of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. They're talking about the Inbred Christo-fascist Enforcers

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] BenderRodriguez@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

There are only 20,000 ICE agents. That's a typical NHL arena. That really isn't a lot of people.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Well at least they're very open and clear about their intentions, and why

[–] RePsyche@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I used to think going to The Polls, on The Day was cool. Citizens participating in Democracy. Awesome. I’ve rethought a lot of things, changed my life in significant ways. Regarding voting, I have not changed, I will always vote in every election, as I have since I turned 18. The difference, is I get an early ballot, I sit in front of the computer and read up on the bond issues, candidates, other matters, and take my time to understand how I need to vote. Then I fill out my ballot, put it in one envelope, and the second one. And I go. Usually by bicycle, directly to the county office, at a time of my own convenience, and put my ballot in the special drop box that is there specifically for this purpose. It’s easier in some ways. And I miss those random moments running into a neighbor at the polls.

load more comments
view more: next ›