this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
926 points (99.6% liked)

Political Memes

11065 readers
2074 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 161 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There seems to be a correlation between being wealthy and being a thoughtless sociopath.

Who'da thunk

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's almost like pathologically hoarding wealth and power far beyond any personal practicality correlates with specific mental defects and personality disorders!

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Sociopathy isn't a specific personality disorder, it's just a slang term for ASPD used by people who want to sound smart by using big words. That's why the writers of Sherlock loved it so much.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 121 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Every time someone pitches the argument that billionaires got there through sheer intelligence and hard work, I want to scream “Have you seen anything this person has wrote or said in public? They are barely coherent! If you asked them where they are right now, they probably wouldn’t know because they pay someone to babysit them through their day.”

[–] night_petal@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There is a non-zero chance that this is due to them having enough money to constantly be on their drug(s) of choice without consequence, though.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I can't imagine myself living that shamelessly

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even people who can't afford it spend their lives completely self-medicated out the ass until the day they die, it should be self-evident that people with no limitations are going to just spend their days zonked out on the deck of their boat instead of working on helping others.

[–] night_petal@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

Real talk. I was unfortunately like that for about 15 years.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 7 points 1 week ago

The richest guy I know (I know two people who own majorities of companies worth over a billion, although one recently sold and he's not quite a billionaire) they both have personal assistants who do all their work for them and write emails etc. which leaves them free to talk to people. And I'll be honest, they are on business all the time, they're obsessed. Even if it's someone else's business.

You know who I know who write their own emails and are great communicators? Lawyers. I know a few lawyers. They're exhausting, but they actually have great work ethics usually.

[–] Aknifeguy@piefed.ca 70 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That is the biggest grift of all. Being a billionaire doesn't require intelligence, it requires you to be a ruthless asshole willing to exploit humanity for your own self interest.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

The "Great Man Myth" was founded by people trying to justify their theft going back as long as we've had currency.

[–] Tanoh@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

And having rich parents to get a huge head start.

[–] antimidas@sopuli.xyz 59 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Back in the day the super rich couldn't bother to write any better, but at least they had the decency to hire a secretary so their messages were even somewhat legible. Seems like the habit of dictating your messages has all but vanished, even in professional contexts.

Maybe the 14-16 year olds they now "hire" are too young to write professionally, compared to the 18-20 somethings of yesteryears.

[–] collectif_imaginaire@piefed.social 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hey hello there I had never heard yesteryears and it is exquisite.

Thank you very much

[–] antimidas@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I think I encountered it first in (old school) Runescape, where one of the songs in the soundtrack is named yesteryear. That was back before the old school distinction, when I was still in elementary.

It's one of the first tracks you hear when you start playing, in case you're not familiar.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And for anyone who doesn't know, you can experience Runescape as it was in its heyday via 2009scape!

The best part is, they offer XP multipliers (by default you can select 1x, 2.5x or 5x XP in case you have a job and responsibilities) its also a super active project with a brilliantly healthy official server to play on, and completely free to play with optional singleplayer!

[–] redknight942@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Cries in sea shanty 2

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Everybody is so worried about the environmental impact of LLMs...has anyone stopped to consider the etymological impact?

[–] MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not to mention the entomological impact (because this whole thing is really bugging me)

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Aye...LLMs are producing all sorts of never-before-seen bugs.

And naked kids on Twitter. But mainly the bugs.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Many people consider these things. On microblog fedi, I see threads (long posts, effectively) about this regularly.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

This is honestly the first I'd thought about it...but language has always been dynamic and organic. Rapid communication has already led to rapid evolution of language and distribution of slang.

Then you get LLMs slurping up all this content and condensing it and adding their own language into the pile.

Eventually the majority of what they intake will be the output of all the other LLMs, and then it's a feedback loop.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Sure, but a lot of that is holdovers from back when you had to put pieces of dead trees into a cryptographic mangler just to tell your secret lover that y'all're gonna get your freak on that motel by the movie theater.

Nowadays, anyone can type "U up?"

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

they simply don't have to care. in a similar way where jobs was wearing jeans and black shirt while everyone around him was saluting in suits. he didn't have to.

also these messages were supposed to be private, lot of our signal/whatsapp chats also look less professional than work emails.

[–] piconaut@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Were these emails encrypted? I thought that regular email is basically public, like sending a postcard. Or is that not the case anymore?

[–] bort@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)

iirc it's tls secured between client and server and again between servers. So no e2ee, but if you trust your provider, everything should be good.

iirc law enforcment regularly forces providers to reveal content of client's mailboxes.

[–] Tanoh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

but if you trust your provider

Which you should never do. They might look good and safe today, but all it takes is a subpoena or a change in management and they will spill all the secrets. Most likely past and present.

Basically, don't do illegal shit over unencrypted forms of communications. But the billionares are not the smartest people, or Epstein thought he was protected enough that keeping a record of his co-conspirators and their crimes would protect him.

[–] antimidas@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Or, if you do want to do illegal shit over unencrypted forms of communication, use your own encryption layer on top, so you can actually be 100 % sure that there's real E2EE. This is the way e-mail encryption was meant to work, before someone added TLS to the "standard" and everyone thought it's OK as they trust the e-mail service provider.

[–] antimidas@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

Yep, the issue is that the server stores the messages centrally in plaintext, and most email users nowadays assume that the server always has a copy. That's why we have PGP and ring-of-trust, and why there used to be a lot of push to use that with especially E-mail. Especially with the preparation to post-quantum era, any communication you actually want to stay secret should be encrypted with (symmetric) keys you exchange in person. That way there's no log or key exchange that someone can see or store, and thus break in the future.

Unfortunately people in general deemed the centralized solutions "good enough", and for "more secure" contexts we got the abysmally horrible solutions like Secure Mail. PGP's problem was, that the trust needed to be established in a distributed manner outside normal communication which the layperson found confusing. It also was problematic in corporate contexts, as proper client-side encryption meant that the company could no longer scan through employee messages.

It's still the best way to make e-mail safe, though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Most of the internet, nowadays, is encrypted on transmission.

Some things are end-to-end encrypted, some things are only encrypted for transmission, and rarely (nowadays) things are not encrypted at all.

Emails are encrypted for transmission.

That means, your email is readable on your computer, on your email server, on their email server and on their computer. Your email is not readable by your router, their router, your ISP, their ISP, or anyone operating a machine over which the transmission happens.

There are end-to-end encryption for email but you would know if you would use it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

that is technically correct, but the point is they still not expected them to be published. in a similar way where you don't really care what the postal clerk will think about grammar on your postcard, while you might pay bigger attention to some text you know you will present publicly.

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This makes me so happy to see how based Chipzel is. For those who don't know, Chipzel is a really awesome classically trained chiptune musician. She's in a bunch of videogame soundtracks, check out her albums!

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was wondering if it was the very same Chipzel.

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Profile pic is her on a gameboy, what do you think? :D

[–] Atlas_@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

The equals aren't part of the emails actually, they're from bad decoding (probably by the govt) https://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/2026/02/02/whats-up-with-all-those-equals-signs-anyway/

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The rich aren't better they are just better positioned.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

If I write a crappy email, I get reprimanded by the boss, or I lose a contract, or people just stop emailing me.

If a billionaire writes a crappy email, their correspondent still wants their money.

[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah but it's also that they're better positioned, yet definitely worse.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

This is why they think AI writing emails for them is revolutionary, isn’t it? Because they’re too fucking stupid to articulate a coherent thought.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I can’t tell if it’s an encoding issue or just spastic.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is an encoding issue from older mail servers. 

[–] vivi@slrpnk.net 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

well, some of it is, like the =, but he also misspells tons of stuff, adds spaces all over the place, doesn't capitalize anything, etc

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

Yes, but that’s pretty standard for business people.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago

It's encoding. I read a detailed explanation the other day, but can't find the article anymore. = and =n\ are new line indicators that have been truncated by incompetent text replacement by the handlers.

[–] antimidas@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

The ID10T encoding scheme

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m caught between thinking it’s a really stupid billionaire flex (interpret my unfiltered gibberish, peasant) and thinking he was actually just sub-literate.

[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

I've known some pretty wealthy people. It's for sure a mix of both but mostly the latter.

load more comments
view more: next ›